MANCHESTER - 5
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just thought I would announce that DL is to increase the ATL capacity when on the 25th October, a 767-400 will leave ATL for MAN.
Good to see the route finally increased but as we saw this summer, nothing is certain!
Good to see the route finally increased but as we saw this summer, nothing is certain!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Viscount 702, I can't give you any information regarding the airfield. It was mentioned in a development meeting I attended a few weeks back and there are plans afoot with regards to improving taxiways etc but there are people on here who know and understand far more about this than me. Maybe they can give you some insight.
With regards to the extension of T2 'West Pier' it looks like I may have contradicted myself slightly. The go-ahead has been given to extend the pier down to Stand 219, so that Gates 216, 217, 218 & 219 will all be connected by airbridges and will form part of the terminal building. By go-ahead, I mean the project has been put forward to the board of directors and they have approved it. However, work on this project probably won't start until Winter 2009/2010 because of other schemes going on elsewhere. The retail and security development in T2 needs to be finalised first, otherwise the scale of building works would be too much to maintain the operation efficiently.
With regards to the extension of T2 'West Pier' it looks like I may have contradicted myself slightly. The go-ahead has been given to extend the pier down to Stand 219, so that Gates 216, 217, 218 & 219 will all be connected by airbridges and will form part of the terminal building. By go-ahead, I mean the project has been put forward to the board of directors and they have approved it. However, work on this project probably won't start until Winter 2009/2010 because of other schemes going on elsewhere. The retail and security development in T2 needs to be finalised first, otherwise the scale of building works would be too much to maintain the operation efficiently.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South of MAN, North of BHX, and well clear of Stoke ;-)
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just thought I would announce that DL is to increase the ATL capacity when on the 25th October, a 767-400 will leave ATL for MAN.
The 763 has been the absolute optimum frame for the route. The 764 in Int'l config is a sensible progression.
You have to hand it to Delta. They have stuck with MAN through thick and thin, often coming back for another try, unlike others.
Plus, the MAN staff are fab (I know you read this site D !)
Stoney
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Delta have the ability to match aircraft to demand. The 777 was great for spotters when it plowed the route, but tour operators filled it to the brim with Y class families off to Orlando, often meaning many J class seats were filled with upgrades.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm guessing Spotty M might be Monarch......three spots above the "M" logo anyone?!
Seven brand new routes for a new season would be quite an expansion from them given they have traditionally been relatively slow and steady in terms of expansion, so I would be surprised.
Seven brand new routes for a new season would be quite an expansion from them given they have traditionally been relatively slow and steady in terms of expansion, so I would be surprised.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pie in the Sky - well no actually?
And all that step 1 -5 guff above in #1897. Just how quickly do you think step 2, demolishing T1 and making the apron good
I don't understand all these suggestions about demolishing Terminal 1 and starting again
Well Momentary Lapse and WincoDinco, shows how much you two know?
The demolshing of T1 was / is still a consideration by MA. Yes it would mean a little disruption, but what is required is thinking outside the box. Construction of the new terminal would come first, behind the present Multi-storey car park, to include the rail station & bus terminus. Only when that is complete and open would you then close & demolish the present T1. The current Piers would be left short term to accomadate pax transferred by bus from the new term. Gradually the piers would be reduced once new apron was down on the site of the present T1, along with new piers.
The construction of a new ATC tower starts imminently, so that is not a problem is it?
The Manchester Area ATC set-up closes in 2009 / 10 and moves to Scotland ( So no more "Manchester Control" on the R/T - it'll all be "Scottish Control " around these parts - bloody diabolical - Salmon & his cronies!!)
As for offices for Airlines and the Airport, there is more than enough space already available in the office block at the Rail station and just a short hop away more office space is lying empty adjacent to the new Ringway road.
"Not Economic", someone quoted! Really, - I wonder if it was considered Economic (obviously it was ) way back in the 60's when T 1 was first planned & then constructed? When any ordinary punter wandered around that "Vast" concourse" he / she saw maybe 50 pax at a time??
What I can't understand, and maybe some enlightened member can tell me, is yes the Pax figures and movement figures have decreased slightly this past couple of years, but they are still where they were in 2004, but everything then was rosy, lovely profits being made, everybody was cock-a-hoop. Now it's doom and gloom, reign back on investment, let-down your staff by trying to outwit them with new and inferior contracts, and what seems like no long-term plans anymore - well none that last more than next next lot of pax figures!! Yes inflation has risen over that period and consequently costs have gone up, but so have charges, so have retail rates, and now no more CAA RPI minus figures to be obeyed.
Anyway, that's my last and final say on the subject.
I'm thanking you
Adola ( Mr. or to some SIR !!).
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
U2 is probably still working out plans for thier operations from October onwards for *all* of their destinations - when they put the GT routes on sale, nearly everything was until the end of September.
As for the pax going elsewhere, could it be that they are going elsewhere because they are going to places which currently do not have a MAN run, or if destinations are the same, the timings from other airports is better than that currently offered at MAN.
As for the pax going elsewhere, could it be that they are going elsewhere because they are going to places which currently do not have a MAN run, or if destinations are the same, the timings from other airports is better than that currently offered at MAN.
T7???????
Is this the text generation gone mad?
Would the extra tap on the keyboard to type '777' really hurt that much?
Is this the text generation gone mad?
Would the extra tap on the keyboard to type '777' really hurt that much?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Viscount
MA extended the west apron, infilled the B1D area and added new stands in the passing bay nr T3, all within the last five years.
Adola
You don't know how much I know. More than you, I bet.
Building a new T1 then demolishing the old one is technically possible (what isn't?) but farcical, expensive and risky. Yes they might keep the piers as stands, but by the time you've left circulation space for a/c and handlers and buses they'll be laying concrete at a postage stamp sized piece at a time, which is expensive, lengthy and leads to an inferior product at the end.
And at some point they'd need to close the piers to fill in the gaps in the concrete so the combined capacity of old and new T1 will be nil for quite a while. Where are those movts going to be handled then? Customer service anyone?
And is there enough space between S200 and T3 and the rail station to get meaningful taxiways in and out to the new terminal, which is going to be a compromised site to start with?
The office block at the Station is empty because there's no demand and the rents are far too high. That's also why Oly House is full of MA staff; because the airlines left there too as the rents were too high. Most MA staff don't even need to be on site (eg HR, Finance, Payroll, and mostl of Group) - an HR officer could be 100 miles away but would be contactable by phone or email.
MA doesn't do risk, so I suspect they'll order a feasibility study to get high order costs then bin it because it's too expensive, complicated, lengthy and most of all risky.
Finally - so they're putting up charges eh? That'll bring the airlines back, not. The whole point of CAA regulation was to protect customers from monopolistic price increases. Now there's viable competition from other airports the regulators have rightly dropped the monopoly issue but it's up to the free market now. Put the costs up too much and airlines will continue to walk.
Better to keep a lid on costs and charges (like any business) and focus on better customer service for the existing customer levels. Why is continuous passenger growth desirable? I really can't understand seeking more when the investment costs are so risky and the current service levels are still so poor.
Bring on aviation fuel tax I say.
MA extended the west apron, infilled the B1D area and added new stands in the passing bay nr T3, all within the last five years.
Adola
You don't know how much I know. More than you, I bet.
Building a new T1 then demolishing the old one is technically possible (what isn't?) but farcical, expensive and risky. Yes they might keep the piers as stands, but by the time you've left circulation space for a/c and handlers and buses they'll be laying concrete at a postage stamp sized piece at a time, which is expensive, lengthy and leads to an inferior product at the end.
And at some point they'd need to close the piers to fill in the gaps in the concrete so the combined capacity of old and new T1 will be nil for quite a while. Where are those movts going to be handled then? Customer service anyone?
And is there enough space between S200 and T3 and the rail station to get meaningful taxiways in and out to the new terminal, which is going to be a compromised site to start with?
The office block at the Station is empty because there's no demand and the rents are far too high. That's also why Oly House is full of MA staff; because the airlines left there too as the rents were too high. Most MA staff don't even need to be on site (eg HR, Finance, Payroll, and mostl of Group) - an HR officer could be 100 miles away but would be contactable by phone or email.
MA doesn't do risk, so I suspect they'll order a feasibility study to get high order costs then bin it because it's too expensive, complicated, lengthy and most of all risky.
Finally - so they're putting up charges eh? That'll bring the airlines back, not. The whole point of CAA regulation was to protect customers from monopolistic price increases. Now there's viable competition from other airports the regulators have rightly dropped the monopoly issue but it's up to the free market now. Put the costs up too much and airlines will continue to walk.
Better to keep a lid on costs and charges (like any business) and focus on better customer service for the existing customer levels. Why is continuous passenger growth desirable? I really can't understand seeking more when the investment costs are so risky and the current service levels are still so poor.
Bring on aviation fuel tax I say.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 57
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A little good news
New routes for the summer programme:-
Loganair - Three per day to DND (Dundee) using SF340
SATA - Weekly sched service to PDL (Ponta Delgada - Azores) with A320s
TACV - Twice weekly to SID (Cape Verde) on B757-200
Also todays Volga Dnepr IL76 visitor will return on 16Feb, Qantas will drop by with their QF002 LHR-MAN-BKK-SYD on 25MAy (B747-400) and Flybe are to add in some extra French regionals (LRH/BES/RNS) peak summer only.
Seats/movements still down on last year though.
Loganair - Three per day to DND (Dundee) using SF340
SATA - Weekly sched service to PDL (Ponta Delgada - Azores) with A320s
TACV - Twice weekly to SID (Cape Verde) on B757-200
Also todays Volga Dnepr IL76 visitor will return on 16Feb, Qantas will drop by with their QF002 LHR-MAN-BKK-SYD on 25MAy (B747-400) and Flybe are to add in some extra French regionals (LRH/BES/RNS) peak summer only.
Seats/movements still down on last year though.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Momentary Lapse.
I believe that the extra stands on the west apron are really for cargo.
As to the stands near T3 if you are talking stands 58 and 301 to 304 weren't these built and then abandoned. They no longer appear on the airfield charts as stands
I believe that the extra stands on the west apron are really for cargo.
As to the stands near T3 if you are talking stands 58 and 301 to 304 weren't these built and then abandoned. They no longer appear on the airfield charts as stands
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NW England
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airport pax figures
Can someone remind me how to find the monthly pax etc figures on the airport website or intranet
It was posted on here a while back but I've lost my note with the instructions on.
Thanks
AE
It was posted on here a while back but I've lost my note with the instructions on.
Thanks
AE