Virgin - 2
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Essex
Age: 37
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cannot be sure of how accurate this is so apologies if there is anything incorrect in this.
A friend of mine was due to fly back from DXB to LHR with Virgin a couple of days ago. After take off, the flight deck said there was a tech problem (mid air) and said they were to return to Dubai. After being in the airport for some 7/8 hours the flight was cancelled and only then were they offered a hotel. In the 7/8 hours of waiting in the airport they were only given a £7 food/drink voucher.
Does anyone know any more information on this Virgin DXB to LHR flight?
A friend of mine was due to fly back from DXB to LHR with Virgin a couple of days ago. After take off, the flight deck said there was a tech problem (mid air) and said they were to return to Dubai. After being in the airport for some 7/8 hours the flight was cancelled and only then were they offered a hotel. In the 7/8 hours of waiting in the airport they were only given a £7 food/drink voucher.
Does anyone know any more information on this Virgin DXB to LHR flight?
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going by the thread title, I thought this was an early Tues joke
While it has been generally known for a while that they (Virgin Atlantic) are not very happy with their A340s (add in the recent manufacturer's reported 'caveat emptor' response to the airline's complaints about the A346) all things being equal, the selection of the 787 was based purely on economics, no?
The part I have a hard time understanding is Dickies' airline eschewing an outstanding powerplant series from his home - namely the RR Trent.
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The, um, 'witty' debate about the '4 engines' strapline has been held several times over the past couple of years, ever since it became inevitable that Virgin would order twins at some point, and it's now a bit hackneyed. That strapline is in fact an Airbus TM, and never appeared on the Boeings. It was removed from the A340s last year, before the much-rumoured A330 order which was dropped at the 11th hour.
If this 787 order is indeed for Virgin, it will indicate an interesting change of direction of - or, rather, addition to - the company's route strategy, I suggest. I would anticipate more emphasis on regional and non-UK bases.
Scroggs
If this 787 order is indeed for Virgin, it will indicate an interesting change of direction of - or, rather, addition to - the company's route strategy, I suggest. I would anticipate more emphasis on regional and non-UK bases.
Scroggs
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The, um, 'witty' debate about the '4 engines' strapline
True to say an interesting change of direction, and commentry of course on future aviation trends; but, as well as changing direction "strapline" words have been eaten, whatever your argument is of their origin and how you choose to spin it.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmmm 5 A340-300s replaced by 15 B787s with options on 8 more. Seriously, the A340-600s are being dumped by their launch customer are they not?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin is an expanding airline, that is why it needs extra aeroplanes. The 787-9 is a good replacement for, and enhancement over, the A343. It doesn't make sense as a replacement for the 368-tonne (or 380-tonne) A346. It is considerably smaller. The 777-300 would be the obvious Boeing product to replace the A346, if Virgin were looking for one.
Scroggs
Scroggs
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And with BA deserting the regions I would say that there are lots of opportunities for Virgin to clean up and make poor old Willy wonder where it all went wrong.
If BA can't find the premium travellers who largely make or break the route, how will Virgin??
More likely for thinner routes from London
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts