Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

FlyGlobespan - 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:02
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: up above
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Globespan to boston

Flyglobespan unveils Glasgow-Boston link - taken from Travel Trade Gazette.


Friday, August 11, 2006


Scottish no-frills airline Flyglobespan is to launch a daily service from Glasgow to Boston, and is looking for code-share partners to spread its reach further into the US.
Flyglobespan will start the service on May 28 next year, offering business, premium economy and no-frills seats.
Flights will depart Glasgow at 11.00, arriving in Boston at lunchtime. The return flight will leave Boston at about 18.00, arriving in Glasgow at 07.00. The carrier will use a Boeing 737-800.
The service will carry about 255 people, with 40-50 seats in premium economy.
Passengers choosing not to order a meal can opt to go “no-frills”. Seat pitches will range from 30 inches to 50 inches for sleeper seats.
The move comes at a time when some North American airlines have been cutting transatlantic links to Scotland.
Tom Dalrymple, chairman, managing director and owner of Flyglobespan parent Globespan Group, is billing the Boston route as the first significant attempt to run a no-frills transatlantic service since Sir Freddie Laker’s Skytrain in the 1970s.
He added that the airline was open to code-share deals with other airlines ahead of any resolution to US-UK talks on flying restrictions. Dalrymple said he expected those discussions to conclude by the end of next year.
Talking about the Boston route, he said: “That aircraft could go onwards, and [any] new open skies arrangements will allow us to fly further.
“Interesting code-shares are something we will be seeking to get our passengers onwards into the depths of the US, and also to widen the distribution of product within the US coming into Scotland.”
diesel36 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:05
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The carrier will use a Boeing 737-800.
The service will carry about 255 people, with 40-50 seats in premium economy.

cosy.........
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:09
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: up above
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flyglobespan unveils Glasgow-Boston link - taken from Travel Trade Gazette.


Friday, August 11, 2006


Scottish no-frills airline Flyglobespan is to launch a daily service from Glasgow to Boston, and is looking for code-share partners to spread its reach further into the US.
Flyglobespan will start the service on May 28 next year, offering business, premium economy and no-frills seats.
Flights will depart Glasgow at 11.00, arriving in Boston at lunchtime. The return flight will leave Boston at about 18.00, arriving in Glasgow at 07.00. The carrier will use a Boeing 737-800.
The service will carry about 255 people, with 40-50 seats in premium economy.
Passengers choosing not to order a meal can opt to go “no-frills”. Seat pitches will range from 30 inches to 50 inches for sleeper seats.
The move comes at a time when some North American airlines have been cutting transatlantic links to Scotland.
Tom Dalrymple, chairman, managing director and owner of Flyglobespan parent Globespan Group, is billing the Boston route as the first significant attempt to run a no-frills transatlantic service since Sir Freddie Laker’s Skytrain in the 1970s.
He added that the airline was open to code-share deals with other airlines ahead of any resolution to US-UK talks on flying restrictions. Dalrymple said he expected those discussions to conclude by the end of next year.
Talking about the Boston route, he said: “That aircraft could go onwards, and [any] new open skies arrangements will allow us to fly further.
“Interesting code-shares are something we will be seeking to get our passengers onwards into the depths of the US, and also to widen the distribution of product within the US coming into Scotland.”
diesel36 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:09
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Middle East / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

That must be an error. Our B767-300 only has 244 config! It does sound very much like the config of our B767. I can't see 50" sleeper seats on a B737 as well as the other main cabin. I knew the B737NG was being used on transatlantic flights, but wasn't sure where to.
Eff Oh is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:11
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: a bouncy castle near PIK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats going to be one FULL B737-800
Voldermort is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:12
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: up above
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats what i thought,

heard the 737-800 might be doing Lpl/Ewr as well.

They have also confirmed there order for 2 787 from ilfc.
diesel36 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:15
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Very Friendly Carrier

To add to eastern wiseguy's post, I would say 'very cosy' especially with the sleeper seat pitch considered.
What have they done to -800? When I worked them it was 189 seats in bucket and spade config.
Am I allowed to choose with whom I share my seat with??? Or is there an 'extra' low cost no-frills i.e. 'Standing?'
JamesA is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 14:56
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If they use the 737NG on the trans-atlantic I suspect it will be in 2 class config.
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 15:26
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: scotland
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think its a typo - sure it is meant to read B767-300, as this is the config of GSMs B767, 24 BUS/60PremECO/160 ECO.
webby1919 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 15:38
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's probably the number of passengers that is the typo rather than the equipment. Tom Dalrymple did speak before about the 737-800 opening up the possibility of longer haul routes, and he specifically mentioned Glasgow-Boston. A 763 would probably be overkill on this route.

Great news, though!
Damian O'Leary is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 16:32
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brighton, England
Age: 43
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Going on the seat capacity announced, one would expect a 763. I would have thought a 752 would have been the perfect aircraft for the route. GLA-BOS can't be much further than the likes of GLA-HRG and GLA-SSH?

Regards

Mike
aeulad is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2006, 18:10
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: up above
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so glad there expanding, hope they do the same at manchester

seem like a good company

which im glad of as ive just accepted a job with them.
diesel36 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2006, 11:50
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STANSTED & MANCHESTER
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
globespan

I would have thought that stansted would get longhaul
it has been said that they were going for newyork and orlando
from stansted but as yet nothing
I see that summer 2007 only shows stansted - chambery
can anyone give any info on summer 2007 other than
chambery ???
daz211 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2006, 18:56
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aeulad
Going on the seat capacity announced, one would expect a 763. I would have thought a 752 would have been the perfect aircraft for the route. GLA-BOS can't be much further than the likes of GLA-HRG and GLA-SSH?
Regards
Mike
I would think your right about the 757, TCX use them on eastern canada flights ie YYZ & YOW, so pretty sure BOS is possible too.

Also if it is a 737-800, The Boeing website state the aircraft has a max range of 3060NM, where GLA-BOS is around 3030NM so its cutting it a bit close.

Last edited by goldeneye; 12th Aug 2006 at 21:06.
goldeneye is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2006, 19:24
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only Summer routes on sale at present are GLA - SFB, BFS - SFB, LPL - EWR. With the exception opf April dates for winter flights which come under summer 2007 timetable.

I would imagine MAN and STN and GLA will see further longhaul expansion when the 757's arrive. Wouldn't be surprised to see the GLA - BOS route extend onto LAS if/when it's allowed.
Jet_stream is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2006, 19:51
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: manchester
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unlikely it they would continue, particularly as a low fare airline. I'm pretty sure passengers arriving in the US have to clear immigration and customs at the first airport they land at. This could take several hours and the plane would be sat there earning nothing. A codeshare with a us loco would be a more sensible option
initial is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2006, 09:59
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester.UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Initial
What relevance does the length of time for pax to clear immigration and customs when arriving in the US' have upon aircraft turnaround times?
Globespan sell their 767's in 3-class config and their 757's in 2-class config. Are there any US Lo-Cost operators that do the same thus enabling a 'code-share' agreement?
Globespan have been spending vast ammounts of money over the years buying blocks of seats on virtually ALL Scotland-US & Canada routes flown by the major scheduled carriers, if Globespan have spotted a profitable route they'll move onto it. All they've done is look at where there customers are flying to and brought their costs 'in house'.
Pontious is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2006, 12:02
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry if I am changing the subject a bit - Flyglobespan said they would consider re-offering Bournemouth from EDI and perhaps ABZ - does anyone know any details? Maybe easyJet will do it instead if its not soon.
Nakata77 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2006, 16:08
  #59 (permalink)  
Fit like min?
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ...
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't see a market for BOH-ABZ myself.

As much chance of me winning the lotte - HEY I'M RICH!!

Seriously would imagine GSM would focus on "bucket 'n' spade" for ABZ to begin with.

And we need a STN route pleeeeeze!

When was BOH-EDI last served - was that with Euroscot or whatever they called themselves? 1-11? Or was it more recent?
Richard Taylor is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2006, 18:28
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pontious
I think what he is driving at, is that a turn around time of between 2 and 3 hours, to allow pax to clear immigration and customs and check back in again, is a long time on the ground.
It might also mean crews will be out of hours or very tight for a two sector day, plus the aircraft is not earning money during this time.
This all adds cost to the operation and puts the break even load factor higher than a point to point operation.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.