Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

HEATHROW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2014, 18:35
  #3181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Una Due Tfc
How much extra tax revenue does the British government get from non UK residents transitting through Heathrow? How many extra immigration officers/Pilots/Cabin Crew/Cleaners/Shop Workers/Mechanics/ATC/Caterers/Fuelers/Security/Baggage Handlers/Bus Drivers etc etc are employed because of them? How much Tax do they contribute to the UK economy?
It's not just that. There is an enormous economic benefit to the whole region from being a hub location. Look at Dallas or Dubai. The transit passengers fill say half the plane. The other half gets taken by O&D passengers from the local region. Neither flow would justify the density of flights on their own, but each supports the other and then there is an economic cascade process that rises from that, because the place gets so well connected internationally.
WHBM is offline  
Old 22nd May 2014, 06:50
  #3182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
The transit passengers fill say half the plane. The other half gets taken by O&D passengers from the local region. Neither flow would justify the density of flights on their own, but each supports the other and then there is an economic cascade process that rises from that, because the place gets so well connected internationally.
Exactly. I've never understood why some people appear unable to grasp what is, after all, a fairly simple concept.

Granted, hubbing isn't universally popular - most passengers would prefer to fly direct, if such a service existed, rather than via a hub, but the point is that in many cases there probably won't be the demand to make a direct flight viable.

While some of Heathrow's current PR campaign is dire, bordering on disingenuous, they have actually made a rather good video explaining the dynamics of hubs, which should be required viewing for contributors to the debate:


Apart from the inexplicable reference to some place called "Dyce", wherever that is (it's actually the original name of what is now Aberdeen Airport).

Of course nothing in the video is specific to Heathrow, it would apply to UK plc's hub wherever that ends up being located.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 23rd May 2014, 06:57
  #3183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Can some one confirm that the new T2 has been built without a baggage system and that every bag is conveyored to T1 for containerizing??
Yes and no.

"Arriving baggage

Terminal 1's baggage system will process Terminal 2's departing and transfer baggage. To give passengers the reliability they expect, we're strengthening and upgrading the Terminal 1 baggage system so that it can handle Terminal 2 bags with ease. For example, we're replacing 17 of Terminal 1's hold-baggage screening machines.

Terminal 2's arriving baggage will be processed in Terminal 2. The spacious new baggage reclaim hall will contain eight international and two domestic carousels. They'll be easy to identify and easy to reach so that passengers can collect their bags for their onward journey.

The carousels will be installed during 2013, ready for passengers to use when it opens in 2014.

Departing baggage

In a later stage of development, we'll be building a new system for departing baggage in Terminal 2. This baggage system will incorporate new technologies to reduce manual handling and improve baggage delivery performance."

http://www.heathrowairport.com/stati...ochure_LHR.pdf
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 23rd May 2014, 21:09
  #3184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why was the baggage system designed in this way? Why was T2 not built with associated baggage system for departures like any airport
T250 is offline  
Old 24th May 2014, 00:44
  #3185 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Why was T2 not built with associated baggage system for departures like any airport
One possibility is that there was not the physical space to do it in the primary construction.
Another is that new technology might be about to emerge and they want to wait for it to be ready.
or they just found a way to save money on this phase.

Many other possibilities are possible!
PAXboy is offline  
Old 24th May 2014, 06:34
  #3186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Darkest Surrey
Age: 67
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What will happen to T!?

Returned from Dublin on tuesday, as I walked from the Irish pier to the domestic arrivals, knowing that Aer Lingus are moving to T2 soon, I remember thinking, this is probably the last time I will do this, however while T1 is scheduled to close (presumably sometime in the next 12 months) I assume that that the aircraft stands/Gates etc will remain even if the access is changed.
Can anyone provide more info?
Surreyman is offline  
Old 24th May 2014, 07:06
  #3187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
I remember thinking, this is probably the last time I will do this, however while T1 is scheduled to close (presumably sometime in the next 12 months) I assume that that the aircraft stands/Gates etc will remain even if the access is changed.
I haven't seen any definite announcement yet re the date that T1 will finally close, but clearly the apron space, minus the piers, will be used as remote stands otherwise there won't be enough stands available at peak times.

In due course the new T2 will expand northwards, in two phases, but the first of those isn't due to open until around 2030.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 08:33
  #3188 (permalink)  

Uncle Pete
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Frodsham Cheshire
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Slots

In the Sunday Times American Airlines has bought a pair of take-off and landing slots from Cyprus Airways for £20million.

It looks as though IAG got the deal of the century when they bought parts of the bmi group from LH
MaximumPete is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 09:57
  #3189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
for £20million
Economics Basics: Supply and Demand | Investopedia
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 17:24
  #3190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Róisín Dubh
Posts: 1,389
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Some airlines make quite a bit of money by leasing some of their pairs. I'd love to know how much EI have made over the years from doing it.

20 million pounds is about the cost of 2 D checks on a widebody though, doesn't sound so bad when you put it like that eh?
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 13:03
  #3191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"There is an enormous economic benefit to the whole region from being a hub location."

can you point me to an academic study proving this?
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 13:30
  #3192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MCT
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can you point me to an academic study proving this?
Try this for starters

http://www.britishchambers.org.uk/as...b_Airports.pdf
Suzeman is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 14:54
  #3193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hardly unbiased I'm afraid - that's why I asked for ACADEMIC papers...........
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 15:14
  #3194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hardly unbiased I'm afraid - that's why I asked for ACADEMIC papers...........
Are you seriously looking for an academic study that's unbiased in a politically loaded subject matter like this? Not possible Harry, that's a loaded question.

"There is an enormous economic benefit to the whole region from being a hub location."
Harry are you seriously questioning this? Almost every post we see from you is anti-Heathrow, one suspects you may have worked there and perhaps left under unhappy circumstances? You clearly liked the place well enough when you chose the username?
If you don't think that Heathrow's hub status brings benefits in terms of jobs and connectivity to the world to London and the wider region then I honestly feel you're denying a clear and apparent reality. The only winner if the anti Heathrow brigade wins will be Lufthansa / FRA, Air France / CDG and KLM / AMS.
Half the businesses I have worked for are located exactly where they are because we can get people in and out of Heathrow and into Europe at a decent pace, it's not rocket science.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 16:17
  #3195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LSZH, oder in der Nähe
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is There A T2 Baggage Shambles Going Unreported?

Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask, or indeed if it's being covered elsehwere, but I did look (promise!) but couldn't find anything anywhere


Has anyone got any update info about the current hold-luggage fiasco at T2?
I flew out of T2 yesterday afternoon as slc with Swiss to ZRH, and am still bagless 24 hours on, with bag just confirmed as still in LHR. (According to a somewhat stressed customer services assistant, virtually no baggage had made it to ZRH yesterday or Saturday on Swiss a/c.)

Is it just an unfortunate (for me) bijou Swiss/ZRH-related microshambles that's playing out, or is it on a larger scale but BAA have learned to manage the PR better since the T5 "opening"?
WeeJeem is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 16:56
  #3196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T2 are still using the existing T1 baggage system, and Swiss temain in T1 until October (!) #confused
Having said that Swiss have been using T2B for over a year, usually Gate B47, (247L/247R) but more recently Gate B36 which is new. Not sure why that should make an impact aside from it's one Hell of a walk from T1....
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 17:43
  #3197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
can you point me to an academic study proving this?
At the risk of stating the obvious, and notwithstanding BAA's propaganda, it might be argued that any enterprise supporting 70,000 or so jobs provides benefits that are apparent without requiring the help of academia to spell them out.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 18:17
  #3198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: leeds
Age: 77
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But unless we are talking about the Boris's Island scenario, the issue is not the base level of activity and jobs. The prime choice is between a development at Gatwick with no taxpayer funding and a development at Heathrow with a significant public funding component. The issue is whether the extra benefits to the economy outside the perimeter fence of LHR3 justify that public funding contribution. Words like enormous and obvious don't really cut it. This is why the hub argument and trying to put some numbers to it is so important.
anothertyke is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2014, 21:32
  #3199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"any enterprise supporting 70,000 or so jobs provides benefits that are apparent without requiring the help of academia to spell them out"

Hmmm......

The coal mines? Shipyards??? British Leyland???? The Civil Service?????

Just because it employs people doesn't mean it's a great idea
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 01:38
  #3200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Reading
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're right, there's nothing about the current baggage fiasco at T1/T2 anywhere on PPrune, or anywhere else. Except, that is, for a brief paragraph on the BBC News website which covered the Queens' official opening of the new T2/Queens terminal on Monday the 23rd. The brief report states there has been severe baggage problems in T1 with many passengers departing without their baggage.

The problems started on Saturday and continued all day Sunday. By Sunday evening there were reports of app. 25,000 bags having been left behind affecting all T1/T2 departures. Many flights departed T1/T2 with no hold baggage at all. Apparently, by Monday lunchtime the airlines and handling agents had 'rushed' about 17,000 bags to their destinations but the baggage system then suffered further issues and the problems started again. Haven't heard what the figures are currently for missed bags.

There is most definately a concerted effort to keep the story out of the press. I'm guessing journalists who are enquiring are being told it's a minor issue and it's all under control. After all, with the Queen arriving to open the shiny new terminal and with the T5 opening fiasco still a recent memory, Heathrow managers must be doing everything they can to keep this out of the news.

T2 does not in fact have it's own baggage sort area. T2 checked in bags are conveyored through a connecting tunnel into the T1 baggage sort area and taken to the relevant stands from there so any problems in T1 will impact in T2.

Did hear it was a software issue.
Midland1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.