JET 2 expansion
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Uk / UAE
Age: 54
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Onchu :-
Some interesting questions??
Why would an auditor resign from a PLC over inter group leasing arrangements?
COULD BE FOR MANY A REASON, WHAT IS YOUR SLANT ON THIS?
Why would a PLC be forced to go main listing to AIM, Normally it’s the other way around?
SEEMS THE DART GROUP THOUGHT THAT BEING ON THE LSE DIDNT GIVE THEM ENOUGH SCOPE TO EXPAND THEIR BUSINESS AND PREVENTED THEM FROM EXPLORING NEW VENTURES HENCE AND MOVED TO AIM TO ACHIEVE THIS, WHATS YOUR SLANT?
How will Jet 2 cope with an a doubling of fuel pricing in august. Current market rate is about $500?
THEY SEEM TO ACKOWLEDGE THAT THE FUEL PRICES IS OF CONCERN BUT ISNT THAT THE CASE WITH ALL AIRLINES. THEIR HEDGING JUST SEEMS TO OF COME TO AN ANNUAL END BUT IM SURE THEY WILL HEDGE FOR THE FUTURE LIKE MOST AIRLINES, AGAIN WHATS YOUR SLANT?
Some interesting questions??
Why would an auditor resign from a PLC over inter group leasing arrangements?
COULD BE FOR MANY A REASON, WHAT IS YOUR SLANT ON THIS?
Why would a PLC be forced to go main listing to AIM, Normally it’s the other way around?
SEEMS THE DART GROUP THOUGHT THAT BEING ON THE LSE DIDNT GIVE THEM ENOUGH SCOPE TO EXPAND THEIR BUSINESS AND PREVENTED THEM FROM EXPLORING NEW VENTURES HENCE AND MOVED TO AIM TO ACHIEVE THIS, WHATS YOUR SLANT?
How will Jet 2 cope with an a doubling of fuel pricing in august. Current market rate is about $500?
THEY SEEM TO ACKOWLEDGE THAT THE FUEL PRICES IS OF CONCERN BUT ISNT THAT THE CASE WITH ALL AIRLINES. THEIR HEDGING JUST SEEMS TO OF COME TO AN ANNUAL END BUT IM SURE THEY WILL HEDGE FOR THE FUTURE LIKE MOST AIRLINES, AGAIN WHATS YOUR SLANT?
Three things you should know about being quoted on the AIM rather than on the main market of the LSE :
No minimum shares to be in public hands
No trading record requirement
No prior shareholder approval for transactions
The last two items are of particulair note. Given the suggestion that an auditor has resigned(if this is the case) could anyone explain why this move is not a retrograde step?
While not suggesting in anyway that Channel/Jet2 are unscrupulous.Some companies given an environment of less regulatory oversight, could be tempted into practices such as overvaluing assets or similair.
If i were an institutional investor such a realignment might give me pause for thought.
No minimum shares to be in public hands
No trading record requirement
No prior shareholder approval for transactions
The last two items are of particulair note. Given the suggestion that an auditor has resigned(if this is the case) could anyone explain why this move is not a retrograde step?
While not suggesting in anyway that Channel/Jet2 are unscrupulous.Some companies given an environment of less regulatory oversight, could be tempted into practices such as overvaluing assets or similair.
If i were an institutional investor such a realignment might give me pause for thought.