SAX CRJ in nose wheel incident
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: viewing from above
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Emergency landing at Hosea Kutako
CLOSE to 40 people emerged shaken but unscathed from an SA Express passenger jet on Saturday after the aircraft was forced to carry out an emergency landing at Hosea Kutako International Airport due to a malfunctioning nose wheel.
None of the 33 passengers and four crew members on board the Bombardier CRJ 200 aircraft, operating flight SA 1753 from Cape Town to Windhoek, were harmed during the emergency crash landing.
A passenger who was on the aircraft praised the air and ground crew’s handling of the emergency. He specifically praised the pilot, Captain Ian van Breda, who kept everyone on board updated as often as possible and managed to land the aircraft well despite the difficult conditions.
“The captain was on the PA system every ten minutes to explain the situation. He did a good job,” the passenger said.
The problems with the nose wheel were discovered when preparations were being made to land the aircraft at Hosea Kutako International Airport. Its scheduled time of arrival was 12h45. According to the Namibia Airports Company (NAC), the aircraft eventually landed at 14h16.
Although the plane began to descend, passengers noted that it stopped its descent and instead flew over the airport. Once the aircraft had passed the airport, Captain van Breda announced that “they were experiencing a small technical problem”, a passenger said.
Ten minutes later the captain announced that the nose wheel “was not coming out”.
The crew was at hand to soothe the fears of the passengers, while the pilots initiated a number of procedures required by the situation.
For 50 minutes the aircraft circled the airport while they tried several procedural tactics prescribed in order to make the nose wheel drop.
The last attempt, described by a passenger, was when the aircraft ascended and then dropped quickly to try and force the wheel out through velocity. This manoeuvre too failed to extract the wheel.
After about an hour, the captain announced that landing would proceed in five minutes and asked the passengers to brace themselves for landing.
At that stage emergency ground crew of the NAC had prepared one of the airport’s runways for the emergency touchdown by spraying a layer of fire-retardant foam onto the surface.
The passengers said that the initial landing, on the back wheels of the aircraft, was “very soft” but as the nose touched the tarmac, “we heard a lot of noise”.
The emergency landing elicited compliments from many who said it was perfect under the circumstances.
Ambulances and firefighters were on stand-by while the plane made its landing.
According to the NAC the passengers were given counselling and treated for shock before they were reunited with their families.
The airport’s runways remained closed for most of Saturday afternoon, until the aircraft had been removed from the site where it had slid to a standstill. The aircraft was removed at around 17h00.
Except for scratches under its nose section and some damage to the nose wheel compartment doors, it did not appear to be seriously damaged.
CLOSE to 40 people emerged shaken but unscathed from an SA Express passenger jet on Saturday after the aircraft was forced to carry out an emergency landing at Hosea Kutako International Airport due to a malfunctioning nose wheel.
None of the 33 passengers and four crew members on board the Bombardier CRJ 200 aircraft, operating flight SA 1753 from Cape Town to Windhoek, were harmed during the emergency crash landing.
A passenger who was on the aircraft praised the air and ground crew’s handling of the emergency. He specifically praised the pilot, Captain Ian van Breda, who kept everyone on board updated as often as possible and managed to land the aircraft well despite the difficult conditions.
“The captain was on the PA system every ten minutes to explain the situation. He did a good job,” the passenger said.
The problems with the nose wheel were discovered when preparations were being made to land the aircraft at Hosea Kutako International Airport. Its scheduled time of arrival was 12h45. According to the Namibia Airports Company (NAC), the aircraft eventually landed at 14h16.
Although the plane began to descend, passengers noted that it stopped its descent and instead flew over the airport. Once the aircraft had passed the airport, Captain van Breda announced that “they were experiencing a small technical problem”, a passenger said.
Ten minutes later the captain announced that the nose wheel “was not coming out”.
The crew was at hand to soothe the fears of the passengers, while the pilots initiated a number of procedures required by the situation.
For 50 minutes the aircraft circled the airport while they tried several procedural tactics prescribed in order to make the nose wheel drop.
The last attempt, described by a passenger, was when the aircraft ascended and then dropped quickly to try and force the wheel out through velocity. This manoeuvre too failed to extract the wheel.
After about an hour, the captain announced that landing would proceed in five minutes and asked the passengers to brace themselves for landing.
At that stage emergency ground crew of the NAC had prepared one of the airport’s runways for the emergency touchdown by spraying a layer of fire-retardant foam onto the surface.
The passengers said that the initial landing, on the back wheels of the aircraft, was “very soft” but as the nose touched the tarmac, “we heard a lot of noise”.
The emergency landing elicited compliments from many who said it was perfect under the circumstances.
Ambulances and firefighters were on stand-by while the plane made its landing.
According to the NAC the passengers were given counselling and treated for shock before they were reunited with their families.
The airport’s runways remained closed for most of Saturday afternoon, until the aircraft had been removed from the site where it had slid to a standstill. The aircraft was removed at around 17h00.
Except for scratches under its nose section and some damage to the nose wheel compartment doors, it did not appear to be seriously damaged.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hell's Kitchen
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Suitecase, some are just more equal than others! Looks like RF has a deal with CarteBlanche and SAX a deal with everybody, quite a few incidents that went under the radar with SAX, engine failure out of FAEL, hydraulic failure into FAGG with 1 spoiler locked and the almost over-run in FAGG with the Q400, maybe there's more, but will we ever know.............
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cape Town
Age: 53
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know guys, that's why I don't even bother to read PPruNe anymore. It has become a place where bored people lash out at everyone they can find. I agree Link got the raw end after the Durban accident and what followed, BUT there were serious questions after the accident, and NOT because of the technical failure, but the way it was handled.
Technical failures happens in all airlines in this country, believe me. Yes, they don't get published as front page news, but neither did Link's before the Durban accident where someone lost his life.
Instead of pointing fingers at the media about this, maybe, just maybe, you can find it in there somewhere to give a fellow aviator a pat on the back and say "well done mate, we know these things happen and you did a great job."
Just my 2 cents worth.
Technical failures happens in all airlines in this country, believe me. Yes, they don't get published as front page news, but neither did Link's before the Durban accident where someone lost his life.
Instead of pointing fingers at the media about this, maybe, just maybe, you can find it in there somewhere to give a fellow aviator a pat on the back and say "well done mate, we know these things happen and you did a great job."
Just my 2 cents worth.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Turn left at the door
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It sounds as though this was well handled by the crew and a job well done.
Incidentally, how many Ppruners gave the Link aviators a pat on the back as the various events were unfolding?
That's my 2 cents, not expecting much change...
Incidentally, how many Ppruners gave the Link aviators a pat on the back as the various events were unfolding?
That's my 2 cents, not expecting much change...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: George, South Africa
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SW to FRA cancelled
Has this aircraft been doing flights within DRC already, maybe the infamous runways at FBM and FIH had their impact?
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Age: 61
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CRJ-200 has had many nose wheel failures around the world. When Bombardier redesigned the model into the -700, -900, and now -1000, they added hydraulic system 2 to lock the nose wheel down.
Hydraulic 2 is not used at all for the landing gear in a CRJ-200, however, all variants use hydraulic 3 for the landing gear.
Hydraulic 2 is not used at all for the landing gear in a CRJ-200, however, all variants use hydraulic 3 for the landing gear.
