AF777 TOGA after thrust reverser deployment
I think that part is the key of the statement - "If an engine stays in reverse".
As I noted previously, Boeing reverser design has been changed so that - baring a failure - the reversers won't stay in reverse even after liftoff, they will continue the stow cycle until they are stowed and locked.
.
As I noted previously, Boeing reverser design has been changed so that - baring a failure - the reversers won't stay in reverse even after liftoff, they will continue the stow cycle until they are stowed and locked.
.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, which fantastically arimanshipped airline are you flying for? I'm pretty sure I will be able to find a low airmanship blunder by one of your colleague (I have a feeling you are French, by the way you use the verb "commit")
Only half a speed-brake
My plane stops completely withing 1500' with max effort, but surely won't get climbing with a reverser out and ground spoilers deployed to begin with.
I think some of the posts on here fail to account for time to spool a fan engine while the aircraft is moving. The 777 is going to need 8 or more seconds to spool a engine. If the reverser is unlocked even longer. At 100 knots you are traveling almost 170 feet per second. You will need almost 1400 feet of runway before you reach Go Around power. You now need to accelerate to takeoff speed before getting airborne. call it 3000 feet and you might be close to clear a very short obstacle. Again if the reversers are unlocked this distance will be longer. Just a guess but I bet most airliners can stop from 100 knots in 1500 feet or less on a dry runway with maximum braking.
Again, this would be split second decision by the PF - and their lives (along with the passengers) depend on getting it right... We design for the possibility that they may decide their best chance is to go-around.
Actually, the regulation says 8 seconds or less from approach idle to go-around. The GE90 does it in about 6 seconds at sea level static (and the idle logic will hold it at approach idle for several seconds after touchdown before allowing decel to min (ground) idle. In addition, although idle needs to be commanded prior to stowing the T/R, the engine itself doesn't have to decel that low before the T/R will stow..
One of the reasons the A330-900 has such poor takeoff performance in a cross wind is the ridiculous amount of runway you eat up with the multistage spooling process.
I agree, if you're down to 100 knots, then you are probably better off trying to stop - even on a low friction runway.
What I'm talking about is - you touched down and just selected reverse (so still in the 140-150 knot range), and something appears blocking in front blocking the runway. That's when an 'aborted landing' after T/R selection might make sense.
What I'm talking about is - you touched down and just selected reverse (so still in the 140-150 knot range), and something appears blocking in front blocking the runway. That's when an 'aborted landing' after T/R selection might make sense.
Only half a speed-brake
This aeroplane at MLW is 130-135 when "just selected REV". V squared matters.
Also, I like to assume being able to scan the runway 2000' upfront before committing to touchdown in the first place. On a daily basis, 1600' seems to be the legal requirement.
Also, I like to assume being able to scan the runway 2000' upfront before committing to touchdown in the first place. On a daily basis, 1600' seems to be the legal requirement.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's when an 'aborted landing' after T/R selection might make sense.
You’re beyond test pilot territory if you continue and a failure to stow is uncommanded engine idle or shutdown at best, hull loss at worst (with secondary casualties on the ground).
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FCTM, FCOM, QRH are quite clear... A go around, after reversers deployment, should NOT be attempted! So, unless there was an emergency ( eg runway uncursion?) I cannot see what would justify a decision like this one. Just my 2 cts, having flown the Triple for nearly 20 years.
But then again…we know from previous events, they are indeed very very special @ Air France!
Another aknowledgement, why I will never let my family travel onboard AF…
Glad this one ended well! Thanks for sharing btw!
But then again…we know from previous events, they are indeed very very special @ Air France!
Another aknowledgement, why I will never let my family travel onboard AF…
Glad this one ended well! Thanks for sharing btw!
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When travelling as pax for work once, I phoned my wife after successfully disembarking with the opening words: "I have just survived a flight in an Airbus flown by Air France pilots..."
A Frenchman that I once worked with pointed out (correctly) that Air France have killed more people than any other airline in Europe.
And here they go-around after selecting reverse thrust...