Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Nepal Plane Crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd February 2023 | 11:29
  #581 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 455
Likes: 459
From: New jersey
Originally Posted by fdr
And, that is not a really old HS748... that is a modern version of the HS748...

while they got the levers right at the throttle quadrant, much else was not so brilliant. The dump valve... fire warning lights from the dark side... a fire bell that the striker was exposed to all and sundry... black over black "attitude instruments"

"call that a knife?.. this is a knife... "
Ah, the old Black over Black Attitude indicator. When I was in Pilot Training in the Air Force, the T-37 had just finished converting to the new colored Attitude indicators. The Older pilots called the “Non-colored Attitude indicators, “The Black Ball of Death”😄
Chiefttp is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2023 | 12:44
  #582 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 90
Likes: 66
From: Looking north out to sea
Re “Pilot Monitoring”.

Please write to Mr Boeing and Monsieur Airbus and get them to change their manuals if you find this annoying. It used to be pilot flying (PF) and pilot not flying (PNF) : TLAs used as the norm. PNF changed some time ago to pilot monitoring. I moved from the Boeing to the Airbus in 2014 and had used it on the the 75/76. As a trainer, I changed with the new procedure and made sure everyone else did too.

Me
ItsonlyMeagain is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2023 | 14:27
  #583 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
From: Broughton, UK
When did they stop using the term 'Co-Pilot.'..?
scifi is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2023 | 14:39
  #584 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 74
Likes: 9
From: Kathmandu
Originally Posted by scifi
When did they stop using the term 'Co-Pilot.'..?
I guess the Wide use in the Mainstream Media has something to do .
Yo_You_Not_You_you is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2023 | 01:03
  #585 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 111
From: Somewhere over the rainbow
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Nope I mean park brakes and not just a first, its happened on at least 5 occasions. On an A320 the park brake is next to the flap handle.
Even if that happens you will immediately have a clearly audible master caution and an ECAM. Pretty much impossible not to notice the slip.

Last edited by pineteam; 23rd February 2023 at 02:18. Reason: Correction
pineteam is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2023 | 02:18
  #586 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
Originally Posted by pineteam
Even if that happens you will immediately have clearly audible master caution and an ECAM. Pretty much impossible not to notice the slip.
I cannot understand how anyone can mistake parking brake for flap lever. It doesn't feel the same, moves differently. Though Airbus could easily inhibit it when gear is up.

Last edited by vilas; 23rd February 2023 at 02:51.
vilas is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2023 | 10:42
  #587 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 156
From: Here, there, and everywhere
Originally Posted by scifi
When did they stop using the term 'Co-Pilot.'..?
Around the same time that they removed stewardess and cockpit from the terminology. Perhaps it was felt that these words could be distracting under certain combined circumstances.
punkalouver is online now  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2023 | 15:07
  #588 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 5
From: Location: Location
I’m not going to comment directly with regards to the sad crash itself, but, the conversation in this thread is something I find very interesting.

There is a lot of talk about the selection of the wrong item and the pilot monitoring (or any other term for the pilot not flying) doing their duties correctly.

It’s something that I have considered and raised a lot over the years. I have often found myself, lets just call it PNF, and on numerous occasions the pilot flying, while I was on the radio talking to ATC or engaged in some other critical task at that point, and I notice them sitting there, pointing to a selection lever be it flaps or undercarriage, and just continuously pointing while looking at me then the lever, then back to me than the lever……..

I tend to ignore them, finish the task I was doing, then ask them, ‘did they want something’ although a lot of the time, as soon as I have finished the transmission, they say straight away “I need the flaps/undercarriage selected”. So I ask if they still want it to which they normally reply “Yes”. So I make a point of looking at the ASI, speaking out loud the air speed is within limits, then verbally announce the selection I’m making, then verbally announce the said selection is actually in transit, then verbally announce the selection has been successful. The bright people soon realise the point I’m making. The others don’t, and want to start a conversation about it. I say we will concentrate on the flight, then discuss afterwards. The amount of people that think it’s ok to just point at something, while the other person is engaged in a task and expect them to just do it amazes me.

If you need it there and then, then do it yourself and bring the other pilot into the loop as soon as they are free. If you can’t manage that yourself, then wait until the other person is free then ask for the selection, so the safety is still there to check and cross check the correct selection is made.
G-DAVE is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2023 | 18:20
  #589 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 933
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by ItsonlyMeagain
Re “Pilot Monitoring”.

Please write to Mr Boeing and Monsieur Airbus and get them to change their manuals if you find this annoying. It used to be pilot flying (PF) and pilot not flying (PNF) : TLAs used as the norm. PNF changed some time ago to pilot monitoring. I moved from the Boeing to the Airbus in 2014 and had used it on the the 75/76. As a trainer, I changed with the new procedure and made sure everyone else did too.

Me
The point is it describes the task the pilot is performing - not one they are not performing
212man is online now  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2023 | 18:22
  #590 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 933
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by scifi
When did they stop using the term 'Co-Pilot.'..?
They didn’t. PF and PM describe the roles of the crew members on the particular sector. Capt and co-pilot describes their status in the cockpit.
212man is online now  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2023 | 18:51
  #591 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 621
Likes: 136
From: UK
Originally Posted by 212man
They didn’t. PF and PM describe the roles of the crew members on the particular sector. Capt and co-pilot describes their status in the cockpit.
However, the term 'co-pilot' has generally been replaced by the term 'First Officer', just as the questioner, 'sci-fi' correctly alluded to. They were simply asking when that happened. I didn't see that they needed to be corrected, as they don't appear to be confused about captaincy / FO distinction vs PF / PNF roles on each flight.

To try to answer sci-fi, I believe it was during the 90s and since, however the timing varies considerably by country / culture, I believe, and I am happy to be corrected.
pilotmike is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2023 | 00:18
  #592 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 953
From: Aus
When did they stop using the term 'Co-Pilot.'..?
Where I operated never, as said by 212man, maybe operator or particular area of aviation specific, mine was off shore oil industry company.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2023 | 07:58
  #593 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
No matter what is the shape of different levers or the knobs on the FCU/MCP or the different ways they are designed to operate pilots have dialed altitude instead of heading, pressed Exped button instead of APP, selected parking brake instead of flaps and retracted flaps instead of gear. The only reason is as one gets more and more familiar with the cockpit controls pilot start reaching for them unconsciously and action them without identifying first. These are not muscle memory or unconscious actions but see and do items. This needs to be enforced and corrected when noticed otherwise a slip is just round the corner can happen any time.
vilas is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2023 | 12:15
  #594 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 156
From: Here, there, and everywhere
Originally Posted by G-DAVE
I’m not going to comment directly with regards to the sad crash itself, but, the conversation in this thread is something I find very interesting.

There is a lot of talk about the selection of the wrong item and the pilot monitoring (or any other term for the pilot not flying) doing their duties correctly.

It’s something that I have considered and raised a lot over the years. I have often found myself, lets just call it PNF, and on numerous occasions the pilot flying, while I was on the radio talking to ATC or engaged in some other critical task at that point, and I notice them sitting there, pointing to a selection lever be it flaps or undercarriage, and just continuously pointing while looking at me then the lever, then back to me than the lever……..

I tend to ignore them, finish the task I was doing, then ask them, ‘did they want something’ although a lot of the time, as soon as I have finished the transmission, they say straight away “I need the flaps/undercarriage selected”. So I ask if they still want it to which they normally reply “Yes”. So I make a point of looking at the ASI, speaking out loud the air speed is within limits, then verbally announce the selection I’m making, then verbally announce the said selection is actually in transit, then verbally announce the selection has been successful. The bright people soon realise the point I’m making. The others don’t, and want to start a conversation about it. I say we will concentrate on the flight, then discuss afterwards. The amount of people that think it’s ok to just point at something, while the other person is engaged in a task and expect them to just do it amazes me.

If you need it there and then, then do it yourself and bring the other pilot into the loop as soon as they are free. If you can’t manage that yourself, then wait until the other person is free then ask for the selection, so the safety is still there to check and cross check the correct selection is made.
It might be more professional to discuss it after the flight.
punkalouver is online now  
Reply
Old 24th February 2023 | 16:42
  #595 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 5
From: Location: Location
Originally Posted by punkalouver
It might be more professional to discuss it after the flight.
That’s what I said in my post.
G-DAVE is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2023 | 20:25
  #596 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 359
Likes: 221
From: Yorkshire
Originally Posted by scifi
When did they stop using the term 'Co-Pilot.'..?
In about three decades of airline flying for several airlines, I never worked for one that referred to "co-pilots".

Both pilots were fully rated on the aeroplanes. The Pilot 'in command' was the Captain, the other Pilot was the First Officer.

The Pilot flying that sector was the 'Pilot Flying' (PF), the other Pilot was the 'Pilot not Flying' (PNF). That was later improved to PF and Pilot Monitoring (PM). Yes, if you are that 'twitchy' it might seem to be 'policing', but I never had any problem with that common sense term.

The term "Co-Pilot" does hark back to the very early days of aviation where the 'Pilot' was a 'god' and the 'Co-Pilot' was his lackey. Thank goodness those days are way in the past!

It could be argued that now the PM is the 'Co-Pilot' and the PF is the 'Pilot', meaning that the First Officer could be the 'Pilot' and the Captain could be the 'Co-Pilot'.
NoelEvans is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2023 | 01:11
  #597 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 953
From: Aus
The term "co-pilot" is written into our regulations (Oz).
CAR 5.166 What does an air transport pilot (aeroplane) licence authorise a person to do?
(1) An air transport pilot (aeroplane) licence authorises the holder of the licence to fly an aeroplane as pilot in command, or co-pilot, while the aeroplane is engaged in any operation.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2023 | 19:02
  #598 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 69
From: on the edge.
CM1 can be either PF or PM same goes for CM2
TheEdge is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2023 | 10:03
  #599 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 456
Likes: 302
From: The South
Originally Posted by blind pew
Unfortunately BEA had a procedure whereby all three pilots were required to write down ATC clearances which probably happened and as such both P1 and P3 were doing so when the droop was selected in.
Had the skipper been following SOPs and not flying too slowly and disabled the stick pusher as well, things may have been different. Culture is the number one safety insurance.
Timmy Tomkins is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2023 | 17:55
  #600 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 965
Likes: 46
From: Ташкент
Had the skipper been following SOPs and not flying too slowly and disabled the stick pusher
Was it established he was the one who disabled the pusher? I agree it seems likely but were both channels separated on the FDR?
flash8 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.