Originally Posted by
FPDO
Kraviator you have a “**** box old mentality” hahaha hahaha hahahahaha
Good to see you are “ current” on FlightAware...hahaha hahhaha hhahha
Ridicule and derision are among the oldest and most pathetic attempts to prove your point, but anyway...I'm not sure what else you would call an airframe that ran up 70,000-odd thousand hours and around 57,000 cycles in revenue service over 22 years before being retired? Successful, yes, but polish a turd it's still a turd.
By the way, for someone who seems to be so
hung up on spelling, you could at least
try to get my username right...