Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

SBRJ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Sep 2016, 14:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Guest
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SBRJ

This is the airport diagram for Rio de Janeiro's domestic airport SBRJ. (Santos Dumont Airport). They recently added RNP AR approaches. The runway length is what grabbed my attention. Seems like the airport has lots of operations; perhaps mostly regional jets but also some 737 operations. There is a photo on the Internet of a 737-800 just after takeoff. My question to those who fly 737-800s: how practical are runways of this length to meet balanced runway requirements and carry any payload and have a practical range?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
SBRJ Airport Diagram.jpg (261.9 KB, 110 views)
aterpster is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 14:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,413
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
aterpster

I've been in/out of there a number of times in Globals and Challengers--it's a mad rush of A320s and B737s, but most of the flights are shuttles to São Paulo (45-ish minutes) or perhaps other destinations within similar distances. Watching them operate off that short runway without overruns and tiny ramps is impressive. But, then again it's the Land of Airton Senna.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 14:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reminds me of Key West, where I, fortunately, haven't had the misfortune of operating in and out of.

Was the late Mr Senna a particular short track specialist? I didn't know that about him...
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 15:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As fas as i know that airport was the main reason to make to develop the shortfield performance kit for the 737NG which became standard equipment on the -900ER and an option on the -800.

It is a short field, but it shouldn't be a big problem as long as the correct procedures are used.
Denti is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 15:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,413
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
At EAL, we operated B727-100s at Key West, not a problem. Senna was mostly on longer tracks.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 15:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Angular - apparently!
Posts: 746
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
As fas as i know that airport was the main reason to make to develop the shortfield performance kit for the 737NG which became standard equipment on the -900ER and an option on the -800.

It is a short field, but it shouldn't be a big problem as long as the correct procedures are used.
Yes, that is correct.

As others have said, it's mainly used for short haul (up to about 300 nm), but the main route is to Sao Paulo's downtown airport, with nearby alternates in each case, so no need for lots of fuel, thus landing and take-off weights are much lower than for more conventional operations. The -300s which were used originally on the route were incapable of landing in the wet (when it rains in Rio it really rains!) and had to divert to SBGL.
barry lloyd is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 16:13
  #7 (permalink)  
Guest
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GF:


I've been in/out of there a number of times in Globals and Challengers--it's a mad rush of A320s and B737s, but most of the flights are shuttles to São Paulo (45-ish minutes) or perhaps other destinations within similar distances. Watching them operate off that short runway without overruns and tiny ramps is impressive.
I live near KCRQ. Lots of high-end biz jets there. You've probably been there. 4,897' runway almost at sea level and usually on the cool side for Southern California. When an operator I am familiar with wants to make long trips in their Gulstreams, they have to position at KSAN, then fuel up and load up there.
aterpster is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 18:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
https://youtu.be/ybxhDrTiRV0

https://youtu.be/yrDniZ23s0Y?t=2m11s

I estimate "Vr" call just past abeam the tower, TO attitude passing twy L, "Positive rate" just before twy G, 50 feet just before twy F. Then a low-level left-and-a-right of 30 degrees to clear the Sugarloaf off the end of the runway. (Key West doesn't have one of those. )

Last edited by pattern_is_full; 20th Sep 2016 at 19:15.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 21:17
  #9 (permalink)  
Guest
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new RNP AR approaches sure do make life easier for approach and being "in the slot" for landing.
aterpster is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 21:40
  #10 (permalink)  
Guest
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Until RNP 0.10 was offered by Boeing as an option for the current advanced 737s, the previous Boeing airplanes were limited to 0.11.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
RNAV RNP W RWY 02R.jpg (462.9 KB, 82 views)
File Type: jpg
RNAV RNP W RWY 20L.jpg (461.6 KB, 53 views)
File Type: jpg
RNAV RNP X RWY 02R.jpg (469.2 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg
RNAV RNP X RWY 20L.jpg (479.3 KB, 66 views)
aterpster is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 21:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,413
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
A HUD helps a lot, too. I have, for some reason, always come in from the west on the RNAV (GNSS) Y Rwy 02R approach or just off a visual inside Corcavado. It's not quite as tight as it looks, but demands some real hand flying. Time of day may have something to do with direction of landing, I think there is a wind shift that's fairly predictable.

WRT KCRQ, been there many times, a Global can lift 8-10 pax and about 29,000 pounds of fuel, call it 7 hours with plentiful reserves at M.85.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 23:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Someone else's acft
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is one of the most beautiful approaches in the world, I'm pretty sure.

It's a challenging airport, but once you get used, is no big deal (under normal weather). When they are operating on runway 02, with strong winds, things can get very tricky. On the other hand, the runway pavement is one of the best around (at least...)

There are many other airports here in Brazil serviced by 737 which I believe are worse to operate than SBRJ...

Just check SBCX & SBIL
B737SFP is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 00:41
  #13 (permalink)  
Guest
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737SFP:

It's a challenging airport, but once you get used, is no big deal (under normal weather). When they are operating on runway 02, with strong winds, things can get very tricky. On the other hand, the runway pavement is one of the best around (at least...)
The new RNP AR W to Runway 02R looks like quite a ride. On auto-flight, it should be no big deal. That is the type of approach RNP AR was made for.
aterpster is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 00:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
terpster...yes, W does seem to be quite a ride, I note 140kt speed restriction on that turn, (winds) and CAT A,B,C, with NA CAT D... Interesting nomenclature on the waypoints, typically descending to TCH...

I would think that the 738 would be a bit of stretch for CAT C and 140 kts....
underfire is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2016, 06:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The friendly skies
Age: 27
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
A HUD helps a lot, too. I have, for some reason, always come in from the west on the RNAV (GNSS) Y Rwy 02R approach or just off a visual inside Corcavado. It's not quite as tight as it looks, but demands some real hand flying. Time of day may have something to do with direction of landing, I think there is a wind shift that's fairly predictable.

WRT KCRQ, been there many times, a Global can lift 8-10 pax and about 29,000 pounds of fuel, call it 7 hours with plentiful reserves at M.85.

GF
Hello GalaxyFlyer

Out of curiosity, for the RNAV Y 02R approach from the west, is the visual portion of the approach a direct left hand turn as is illustrated on the chart or do you circle to the south to fly over the same beach as the RNP W approach (the one I've stuck the red arrow below)? I only ask because the videos on Youtube all show planes flying over that beach to the south and there really doesn't seem much time to line up on final, even from there. Also, if you do circle over that southern beach, do you tend to start the turn a little way before RJ034?



Kind regards

Charlie Reed
CReed is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.