PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 14:58   #61 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SFO
Age: 35
Posts: 39
Pictures of the damage here.

http://www.hamburg-airport-friends-f...hread.php?tid=763&pid=2607#pid2607

Last edited by JuniorMan; 2nd Mar 2008 at 16:40.
JuniorMan is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 15:45   #62 (permalink)
A4

Ut Sementem Feeceris
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,297
Not my idea of a fun day out!

Firstly, hats off to the guys for recovering from a very near disaster

I'm Airbus. Only ever flown the B737 sim. I can honestly say in 10 years and 7000 hours on the narrowbody Bus I have never hit the stops with the sidestick - and I've landed in some pretty strong x-winds (but probably not as strong as the LH guys!) Fly the approach crabbed, squeeze (not kick) the drift off, and a little into wind sidestick works (for me!)

I'm sure I've read somewhere that the roll control laws are different with CONF3 as opposed to FULL - hence the recommendation for F3 in gusty conditions (also less drag). If anyone can find a reference or proof of this I'd be grateful as I sometimes think I've imagined it.

Fly safe,

A4
A4 is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 16:36   #63 (permalink)
F4F
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: on the Blue Planet
Posts: 257
A4 thanks for your inputs (!) it makes for some very interesting reading and makes me wonder...
Quote:
hats off to the guys for recovering from a very near disaster
Well, this only can be subjective... had they requested the more into wind runway and had they hold into wind wing down the whole thing might have been a non event

Quote:
I have never hit the stops with the sidestic
That is an interesting one. I admit having less experience on the Bus than you have, but already hit the lateral stops a couple of times...
Now I must meditate about the reasons for me (and some other guys here) having hit said stops and you not.
Could it be we are conditioned by our previously flown aircraft? Are we too much in a hurry in trying to correct the attitude? Have you ever encountered a situation were quick recovery was due and calmly not used stick to stops? Or is the answer a combination of all these?

Quote:
squeeze (not kick) the drift off
Fully agree on that one, specially on the -19

As for F3 in gusty winds is a good choice (as on most aircraft), a few pro arguments here are higher approach speed hence stability due to increased apparent wind, better response to control inputs, and less prone to lift a wing. Can't recall anything about a change of law in 3, but never done with learning


live 2 fly 2 live
F4F is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 17:28   #64 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 842
judging from the pic they might have stressed the outer section of the wing.... they are very very very lucky they didnt write the aircraft off.
Bearcat is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 17:58   #65 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 37
anyone know why EVERY post on this thread with a video link has now been removed?

cant understand on what basis LH would have been able to have the videos of this event pulled from youtube and all now all the links from PPRuNe.
DISCOKID is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 18:02   #66 (permalink)

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 81
Posts: 1,892
They work fine still for me.
John Farley is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 18:20   #67 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mystic Orient
Posts: 314
THIS link may survive!!




seekayess is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 18:24   #68 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 594
The Liveleak link on the first page is still there and worked last time I tried it. I have to admit to grabbing a copy from there when the YouTube version got pulled.
llondel is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 18:28   #69 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Shores of Lusitania
Age: 43
Posts: 405
Quote:
anyone know why EVERY post on this thread with a video link has now been removed?
Hey...good question...even the Youtube Account of Xylon1986, the guy who posted other "No Guts-No Glory" videos of that day at HAM, has closed and disappeared along with all those clips...
JanetFlight is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 18:29   #70 (permalink)

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 40
Posts: 2,797
context ad on Liveleak: stop fear of flying with hypnotherapy

That's pretty good software right there
MarkD is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 20:55   #71 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SLF, living somewhere East in the West
Posts: 228
2 questions

Question of the uninitiated (i.e PAX) if II may:
Why are planes still going into an airrport if it is known that a major storm is right in that area? Wou;dn't it be wiser to either not depart or divert?

How is the situation now, flying into Hamburg tonight with EK from NYC...?
grimmrad is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 21:01   #72 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hamburg, GER
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by grimmrad
How is the situation now, flying into Hamburg tonight with EK from NYC...?
I can only tell you about the situation now: It is still fairly windy, but definatly less than yesterday. The storm has passed and I think tomorrow things will be completely back to normal again. There shouldn't be any problems for your flight from New York as the flight arrives around noon, local time.

Blue skies - Jakob (I live in Hamburg ATM)
United B-777 is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 21:20   #73 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Looking up
Age: 41
Posts: 1
Captain praised as hero on germany's laeding tabloid

http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/leserre...o=3910488.html

Dieser Pilot verhinderte Flugzeug-Katastrophe

Dieser Pilot ist ein Held!



"verhinderte" translates to "prevented"...
yeboman is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 22:06   #74 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cork
Posts: 77
http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/leserre...o=3910488.html

Story in german news website www.bild.de The Captain and a Lufthansa spokesman are briefly quoted.

Last edited by CorkEICK; 2nd Mar 2008 at 22:15. Reason: spelling
CorkEICK is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 22:23   #75 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 190
Now we know why Airbus have downward wingtips too, they are feelers!!!!!
fleigle is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 22:23   #76 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Up there
Posts: 30
Not sure, but could the video have been taken airside?
Outlook is online now   Reply
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 23:29   #77 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia.
Posts: 300
If the fly-by-wire system is able to keep the aircraft safe by remaining inside an operational envelope (not too fast, not too slow, limits on bank angle and angle of attack etc.) why can't the same be done with aircraft attitude when close to the ground.

There is an envelope outside of which either the tail will scrape, or the wingtips will scrape given the aircraft's attitude and height above the ground. Why can't these limits be protected via the flight control software/computers?
Blip is offline   Reply
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 00:11   #78 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 693
Mainly because computers can't decide if in fact you need a sudden bank angle demand, such as for an avoidance manoeuvre.
J.O. is offline   Reply
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 03:11   #79 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,213
I would be interested to hear what formula various companies use to assess whether the crosswind component is with limits. The company I work for use the crosswind component for the mean wind plus half the TOTAL gust.

So if you are landing on RW 23 and the wind is 290/33 gust 49, the mean component is 30 kts (60 degrees off is 87%) plus 8 (ie 49 minus 33, divided by 2) which gives a figure of 38 kts. I think this system works well.

Some comments on crosswind landings. If you are going to make any mistakes apply more into wind aileron rather than less. Never have liked the term kick off the drift - I think of "straightening the a/c with rudder". The further effect of rudder is roll so whilst doing this you need to feed in opposite aileron. The important bit is getting the timing right! Also I believe a common error is to carry excess speed. Ok if its gusting 49 kts more speed is probably safer than less but if you have excess speed in the flare you are going to float before touchdown which makes judgement of when to straighten the a/c more challenging!

Mind you if in doubt ask for another runway or divert!
fireflybob is offline   Reply
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 05:03   #80 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia.
Posts: 300
J.O. I'm simply talking about keeping the wing tips and tail a safe distance from the ground.

Say that safe distance is 3 feet. If the wing tip gets to say 2.5 feet, the Flight Control Computer (or whatever Airbus call it) makes it's own input to restore the wing tip back to 3 feet. It's no different to limiting the bank angles at higher altitudes only the values are reduced. Perhaps when this kind of input is being made by the computer the pilot can be informed with some kind of annunciation or sound.

Surely the safe operating envelope can be made to reduce as the RA passes from say 20 feet to touchdown. We're simply talking about a computer program aren't we?

O.K. What would happen if at circuit altitude, you try to maintain the bank angle right on the aircraft's limit with the control stick and then induce further roll through rudder or thrust asymmetry? Would the computer simply make an aileron input that brings the roll back to within it's limits?

I have never flown Airbus so these are sincere questions.
Blip is offline   Reply
Reply
 
 
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 13:36.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network