Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW USA
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some Graphics in a BBC Story
BBC News - Search for MH370 switches underwater
(Image removed -- click on above link to see source)
(Image removed -- click on above link to see source)
Last edited by Vinnie Boombatz; 9th Apr 2014 at 19:31.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Age: 72
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.And there is no reason to doubt the Chinese in this matter, unless you (or someone) dislike Chinese and are allowing that to cloud their judgement
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NNW of Antipodes
Age: 81
Posts: 1,330
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JamesCam
Anyway, even a decent LC oscillator will have better frequency stability over varying supply voltages than the performance described in the OP's post!
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If there is one thing the Chinese cannot afford is to do is to release some info/data which proves to be false later on.
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: California
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I find it extraordinary that the ping frequency apparently changes so dramatically with power supply voltage! Surely the device is crystal controlled? what use is a device like this if the frequency one is looking at is effectively unknown. To detect the signal at a distance one needs to use very narrow bandwidth filters of the order of only a few Hertz: here we are talking about a shift of 4.2KHz, well over 10%...
I don't believe this equipment performs this badly, given it's designed role. was the Ocean Shield following something else? can someone quote the source of the "manufacturer's" comments?
James
I don't believe this equipment performs this badly, given it's designed role. was the Ocean Shield following something else? can someone quote the source of the "manufacturer's" comments?
James
My understanding is that underwater sounds can reflect back off the bottom and / or thermal layers in unpredictable ways. There are tales of submarines being tracked from more than a thousand miles away under the right acoustic conditions. I have no problem imagining that a pinger's signal could turn up three hundred miles away. Also, the only way I could imagine parts of the plane coming down 300 miles apart is if it was high up on re-entry al la space shuttle. I also can't imagine any fish making a love call on 37khz or so with a pulse repetition frequency similar to an underwater beacon.
Submarines are a different story. Attenuation is orders of magnitude lower at lower frequencies.
Any repetitive source of white noise with the right repetition period would sound like a pinger to a narrowly-tuned pinger detector device.
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Gdansk, Poland
Age: 47
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My understanding is that underwater sounds can reflect back off the bottom and / or thermal layers in unpredictable ways. There are tales of submarines being tracked from more than a thousand miles away under the right acoustic conditions. I have no problem imagining that a pinger's signal could turn up three hundred miles away.
The sounds that can be heard hundreds of miles away - because of phenomena called ducting - are low frequency sounds, that can travel in water great distances with minimal loss of energy. Such sounds can be detecte from long distances in similar way like astronomers detect very weak light of distant stars or galactics - by using very large reflector and focusing the energy from large area to very small area (for example using long towed sonars or finding a natural sound convergence zone).
The emergency pinger generates a high frequency sound, which is highly attenuated in water, and it loses it's energy relatively quickly with distance.
So at distance hundred of miles it can't be detected even using a large reflector or antenna or sound convergence zone - because there is nothing to detect.
An analogy - a large astronomical telescope can be used to detect very, very weak energy from a distant star (too weak to be registered by a CCD detector). The light is really very, very weak but IT IS THERE, only "very diluted". If you are smart enough, you can build a device that would amplify it to detectable level. So you build a telescope with a big mirror, collect the weak energy from large area and focus it on a small area - so it's again detectable by your CCD detector.
Trying to detect 37.5kHz pinger from 100nm by any sensor, would be like trying to use an astronomical telescope to detect a light from a street lamp that is only 10nm away - but in a thick fog. The telescope is big, but it won'd detect a light from the lamp because it was attenuated by the fog to practically zero level and there is simply no light that can be focused, period.
It doesn't matter how big your telescope/towed array is, if you are 100nm away you can't amplify a signal that was attenuated to zero level before it reached 10nm. It doesn't matter that there is a "natural water telescope" named convergence zone - it would amplify sounds and you would hear even wery weak signals of low or medium frequency, but you won't hear an ultrasonic pinger because at such distance it;s sound energy is not "diluted" - it doesn't exist anymore.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lovely graphics. However over the years I have found that really nice slick presentations provide a credibility that is far greater than the underlying science and data are worthy of.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Before anybody gets all excited over this claim, or the other, remember their is an awful lot of noise under the water, and that is what the game is all about when it comes to underwater boats. Those who can hear and decipher what they hear, and those which only record noise. Perhaps those who know can comment on the current realities being faced with the recovery teams.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Nearby SBBR and SDAM
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
37.5 KHz sources
mm43,
From an "weak signals" reception using DSP, a tolerance of + or - 5% could be OK. Even to identify multiple sources as you commented. Weak signals reception is a fascinating task now with the current techniques available. And this LF signals are very easy to process.
How about an oceanic mid-air! Potentially you may need to identify 4 ULBs.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North of 62N
Age: 63
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
33.3 KHz rather than 37.5 KHz
It is well known that a transducer changes the resonance frequency under pressure. Without knowing the ULBs construction or other reasons, I can imagine that the design goal is to get the highest signal rather than keeping the frequency on 37.5Khz. The ULB may be pretty simple (kiss) and only kick the transducer at right timing and keep it running for a predefined time at the current transducer resonance. The frequency is not as important than getting the best signal strength.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Amizaur
The emergency pinger generates a high frequency sound, which is highly attenuated in water, and it loses it's energy relatively quickly with distance.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Nearby SBBR and SDAM
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Weak signals reception field
Perhaps those who know can comment on the current realities being faced with the recovery teams.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Bucks County, PA
Age: 74
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could the Chinese have heard their own pinger?
In a video of the Haixun 01 on CNN, it appears the Chinese had a spare pinger in the RIB.
Anish Patel, president of pinger manufacturer Dukane Seacom, says it is not recommended to have a pinger near the area where you are trying to listen.
If that pinger gets wet, it will start transmitting, potentially confusing search teams.
"I wouldn't put one where I'm measuring," Patel said. "It's just not good common practice."
Anish Patel, president of pinger manufacturer Dukane Seacom, says it is not recommended to have a pinger near the area where you are trying to listen.
If that pinger gets wet, it will start transmitting, potentially confusing search teams.
"I wouldn't put one where I'm measuring," Patel said. "It's just not good common practice."
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Arizona
Age: 76
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Modern Signal Processing is not magic
When you use a "quite simple" DSP software in your computer audio adapter you can see clearly signals impossible, repeat, impossible to hear.
DSP can improve the effective signal-to-noise ratio. For some kinds of signals (coherent ones), it can do this by a lot. The same principle that allows undersea submarines (shallow) to hear ELF radio waves is at work: integration of the signals over time. But... a submerged sub may have to integrate a (radio) signal for maybe one minute for every bit of information - a data rate of less than .1 bps! This same technique can be used in sonar - a maritime target like a sub hopefully has some relatively continuous signals (prop cavitation, or a pump resonance) which can be integrated for a long time.
However.... integration has the following limitation: signals decrease exponentially with distance, while integration only improves the SNR linearly.
This means that if the signal has gone down by 100 (which is only 20 decibels - dB), you have to integrate 100 times as long. With this signal going to 5dB per kilometer ( as opposed to low frequencies which go down at .001 dB per kilometer), it's clear that, while DSP can extend the range, it can only extend it by a few kliometers.
It helps if the signal is designed to be integrated, which these pingers are not.
There are other tricks in the DSP arsenal, but there are ultimate limits. I could see the "specified" range exceeded by a few to maybe 10 km.
A nice calculator for sound propagation attenuation is at Calculation of absorption of sound in seawater.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW USA
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Underwater Acoustics Handbook
A nice handbook, though the last half on marine mammals is of less relevance here:
http://oalib.hlsresearch.com/PocketBook%203rd%20ed.pdf
The ULB frequency of 37.5 kHz falls on the right side of Figures 4 and 5, supporting other posts saying that the noise environment was a driver in the ULB frequency choice.
http://oalib.hlsresearch.com/PocketBook%203rd%20ed.pdf
The ULB frequency of 37.5 kHz falls on the right side of Figures 4 and 5, supporting other posts saying that the noise environment was a driver in the ULB frequency choice.
Don't know when the next PC will be but just checked their website,nothing new so far today as of 0927 Perth time,except HMS Echo joining Haixun 01 at the southern end.
Search and recovery continues for Malaysian flight MH370
Search and recovery continues for Malaysian flight MH370
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The paper I linked earlier: Flight Recorder Localization Following at-Sea Plane Crashes
has two useful charts:
Fig 2.11 (p23) shows attenuation against frequency.
Fig 2.13 (p27) shows background noise against frequency.
They show that 37.5kHz is well chosen for background noise, if a little high to balance for attenuation.
has two useful charts:
Fig 2.11 (p23) shows attenuation against frequency.
Fig 2.13 (p27) shows background noise against frequency.
They show that 37.5kHz is well chosen for background noise, if a little high to balance for attenuation.
Last edited by BillS; 8th Apr 2014 at 01:55. Reason: added comment
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There have been reports that there's another press conference early this afternoon, AEST, on further MH370 developments.
The news item said the Defence Minister was holding the conference. I think that was a typical media stuff-up, they don't even know the difference between the JACC leader and the Defence Minister.
The Ocean Shield has recorded two separate pings, on different frequencies, that appear to coincide with the signals from a CVR and FDR.
It's starting to appear that the transit of Cyclone Gillian on 22-23 March, which hit Christmas Island, then went through the region of the current search area, has seriously diminished the chances of finding floating MH370 wreckage.
In this region, the wreckage would not have been pushed towards the West Australian coast, it would have been circulating in a current eddy in the region or be pushed towards Christmas Island.
When HMAS Sydney was sunk around 130 NM SW of Carnarvon, Western Australia, in November 1941, a Carley float from the Sydney, containing the remnants of a corpse, was washed up on Christmas Island some 3 mths later.
The news item said the Defence Minister was holding the conference. I think that was a typical media stuff-up, they don't even know the difference between the JACC leader and the Defence Minister.
The Ocean Shield has recorded two separate pings, on different frequencies, that appear to coincide with the signals from a CVR and FDR.
It's starting to appear that the transit of Cyclone Gillian on 22-23 March, which hit Christmas Island, then went through the region of the current search area, has seriously diminished the chances of finding floating MH370 wreckage.
In this region, the wreckage would not have been pushed towards the West Australian coast, it would have been circulating in a current eddy in the region or be pushed towards Christmas Island.
When HMAS Sydney was sunk around 130 NM SW of Carnarvon, Western Australia, in November 1941, a Carley float from the Sydney, containing the remnants of a corpse, was washed up on Christmas Island some 3 mths later.
Last edited by onetrack; 8th Apr 2014 at 02:34. Reason: addendum ...
OK, assuming for a minute that these pings pan out, could someone with real knowledge of the subject give a rough number for how long it will take to:
1) Triangulate the location to a limited area;
2) Bring in side scan sonar to survey the area;
3) Do the survey and identify likely targets;
4) Bring in appropriate deep sea submersibles (manned or remote);
5) Go take a look and definitively say this is it and start actual recovery?
I'd like to think the necessary side scan and submersible resources have already been tasked to the general area, but maybe I'm being too optimistic. So what time period are we looking at - a week, two weeks, a month? Longer?
1) Triangulate the location to a limited area;
2) Bring in side scan sonar to survey the area;
3) Do the survey and identify likely targets;
4) Bring in appropriate deep sea submersibles (manned or remote);
5) Go take a look and definitively say this is it and start actual recovery?
I'd like to think the necessary side scan and submersible resources have already been tasked to the general area, but maybe I'm being too optimistic. So what time period are we looking at - a week, two weeks, a month? Longer?