Typhoon with conformal tanks.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't know how the camel packs affect manoeuvrability of course, but all other things being equal it seems odd to rely on air-air refuelling rather than increase range independently.
Interesting. The case being made here is that the aircraft works quite well with conventional tanks and AAR, so why complicate things?
The underlying point may be that CFTs are most valuable for an aircraft that is otherwise short of pylons (F-16) or if the non-CFT configuration is draggy (Shornet). There may be other considerations - the USN seems most keen on the CFTs for Growler, not only because of performance but because underwing tanks mask the field of view of the jam pods.
The underlying point may be that CFTs are most valuable for an aircraft that is otherwise short of pylons (F-16) or if the non-CFT configuration is draggy (Shornet). There may be other considerations - the USN seems most keen on the CFTs for Growler, not only because of performance but because underwing tanks mask the field of view of the jam pods.
Perhaps more importantly, Air Cdre Beach stated (bold):
Without wishing to make any comment on current capabilities, it would seem that it's pretty important that Voyager also needs to have a reliable MIDS.....
The August-September 2013 Syria crisis saw the RAF Typhoon force integrating its operation with ground-based radars at the British sovereign bases on Cyprus and a Royal Navy Type 45 air defence destroyer off shore. This involved the sharing of radar data across Link 16 networks, said Air Cdre Beach. "Our ability to change in dynamic circumstances, depending on who had the best picture, between the air, land or maritime assets having tactical command and control, and the Typhoon working to any one of them, and sharing the picture, was really impressive. The Operation 'Luminous' experience demonstrated just how closely air and maritime elements are able to work, exploiting the strengths of each platform, and using the Typhoon as the 'sharp end' of that capability."
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The underlying point may be that CFTs are most valuable for an aircraft that is otherwise short of pylons (F-16) or if the non-CFT configuration is draggy (Shornet).
They're shooting at the tanker?
He also described how RAF Typhoon crews are carrying out training with the aircraft's 27mm Mauser cannon. "We used it first on exercise in the Middle East, and we've also had great success in the UK in the air-to-air and air-to-surface roles," he said. "The other Eurofighter nations have used it, but primarily air-to-air. The question for us now is sustainability, logistics, and support; at the moment we could use the gun day-to-day if needed to because we could put the support structures in place, but we're taking a measured approach and not routinely operating it."
He also described how RAF Typhoon crews are carrying out training with the aircraft's 27mm Mauser cannon. "We used it first on exercise in the Middle East, and we've also had great success in the UK in the air-to-air and air-to-surface roles," he said. "The other Eurofighter nations have used it, but primarily air-to-air. The question for us now is sustainability, logistics, and support; at the moment we could use the gun day-to-day if needed to because we could put the support structures in place, but we're taking a measured approach and not routinely operating it."
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,808
Received 135 Likes
on
63 Posts
I'm a little puzzled here.
Why should extended range "after the tanker" not be a desirable increase in capability? As Typhoon moves into the mud-moving and Recce environment, surely this would be a 'good thing'? Once the airframe is festooned with weaponry, any stealth aspects diminish ... but in the Recce role that's perhaps a more significant aspect.
Surely this is about reach, and CFT can achieve that while the AAR asset status well out of range of 'Whatever/Whoever"? The future scenario is an 'unknown unknown' an it seems a sensible option, even if not fleet-wide.
Why should extended range "after the tanker" not be a desirable increase in capability? As Typhoon moves into the mud-moving and Recce environment, surely this would be a 'good thing'? Once the airframe is festooned with weaponry, any stealth aspects diminish ... but in the Recce role that's perhaps a more significant aspect.
Surely this is about reach, and CFT can achieve that while the AAR asset status well out of range of 'Whatever/Whoever"? The future scenario is an 'unknown unknown' an it seems a sensible option, even if not fleet-wide.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If conformal tanks are used in future and agility is still paramount, would uprated engines be the answer? Just a thought.
They're shooting at the tanker?
BEags
Why would you put a datalink in a tanker when you're skint? The Typhoon has a RADAR and third-party tracks on its own datalink to find the tanker. I agree it's a 'nice to have' but not sure it's on the 'essential' list.
LJ
Why would you put a datalink in a tanker when you're skint? The Typhoon has a RADAR and third-party tracks on its own datalink to find the tanker. I agree it's a 'nice to have' but not sure it's on the 'essential' list.
LJ
If I remember my old JTIDS course, any JU is capable of relaying - it's supposed to be a nodeless system. I agree that sitting in the tanker tracks on the edge of 'sausage side' watching your receivers coming and going is excellent for your SA, but when we can't afford many other more essential bits of kit for our aircraft this would be a 'nice to have' in my opinion.
LJ
LJ
Link is not expensive and it is at its best when all your assets are on the net. Everyone has something to add to the picture, just imagine being a battle manager and knowing, for example, how much give-away all your tankers have.
Everyone should be on the net.
Everyone should be on the net.