![]() |
Originally Posted by excrab
(Post 10807282)
It was destroyed when companies like Astreus, Ryanair, EasyJet and all the others started to schemes where holders of fATPLs could get a type rating and then fly for 500 hours effectively for free in the hope of getting a permanent job. But even then those schemes wouldn’t have destroyed the profession and started a race to the bottom unless those fATPL holders hadn’t jumped on the band wagon to avoid working their way up through instructing, single crew air taxi, regional turboprops etc on the way to a shiny jet.
Who was seating in the LH seat of a Ryanair flight 15 year ago, a 200h fATPL pilot or an experienced one?
Originally Posted by excrab
(Post 10807282)
why should I sacrifice what is left of my career to help you with yours
|
Originally Posted by calypso
(Post 10806999)
I for one much rather stay at home for two years if required and return to a fair paying job than to keep my job but work for half the pay the rest of my career. Is simple maths if you look a career earnings.
|
Originally Posted by excrab
(Post 10807282)
So however much you want to pontificate I will do what I need to do to keep a job and put the money in the bank that my family needs, and I’m sure I won’t be alone in that. And if that means accepting a pay cut for a while then I’ll do it. And if that means that someone with ten or twenty or thirty years of earning potential ahead of them are upset then so be it, why should I sacrifice what is left of my career to help you with yours.
|
excrab, FlyingStone and PilotLZ are living in the real world.
|
As I've previously suggested, pilot salaries were ripe for a "refresh" and this situation has provided airline management with the ideal excuse to take the axe to Ts&Cs. From an accountant's point of view, it is easy to see why £100k+ salaries are unjustifiable for a role which has an extremely low (academic) bar to entry, has massive oversupply and is highly aspirational. The "new normal" will be captains on train driver salaries (without any of the associated benefits) and first officers either paying to be there or on minimum wage, zero hours contracts. It's no good stomping our feet and pretending that it isn't the case. The salaries we enjoyed three months ago will be comfortably the highest the vast majority of us will ever earn in our careers.
|
There’s never been an unity in this game - if you get moral scruples and sit at home, thousands will queue up for your place. Even at half pay it’s better than working outside the flightdeck
|
Originally Posted by Theholdingpoint
(Post 10807352)
Did you and pilots with your level of experience do anything to stop such schemes when they started popping up?
Who was seating in the LH seat of a Ryanair flight 15 year ago, a 200h fATPL pilot or an experienced one? Nothing new here. |
If we assume the wildly pessimistic scenario of pilots starting to get paid as much as cashiers in McDonald's, we'll get where the USA used to be not too long ago. A bona fide shortage of pilots for any but the top-notch carriers. In conjunction with the artificial shortage created by the 1500-hour rule, it genuinely grounded some regionals for lack of crews. Hence, good packages started being offered, far superior to those in Europe.
You can't be doing P2F from line training till command upgrade. Neither can you survive for years on 18K, however strong your passion is. A job is a job, you count on it to make a living. Anyone in their right mind can only survive for that long sleeping in the car and eating canned beans three times a day. This, if it happens, will lead to flying becoming far less attractive and far less likely to be a lifelong career of choice rather than a few-year "I-tried-flying-a-jet-for-real" affair. And things will self-adjust. Although I'm in the moderately optimistic lot foreseeing a reasonably good future for the profession, I cannot deny that things will get ugly for anywhere between 1 and 3 years from now. But afterwards, demand will be back and higher than in 2019 and many existing crews will have retired. So, who will be needed to get those planes flying? Hint: not only the 200-hour guys, you can't run any airline on cadets only. |
I will advise against listening to any of the obvious management trolls who fester on this thread. It is in their interest to paint a picture of the sky falling,so that it will be easier to lower terms and conditions. It is the classic “never let a good crisis go to waste “ ploy.
|
I really don’t think you need to be a “management troll” to predict that the results of this pandemic will have a devastating effect on the industry. Just read the papers or watch the news, apart from the “our plan is working” UK government daily briefing. For the UK alone there are predictions of the UK economy suffering it’s worst recession in peace time, housing market crashing and 3.5 million people unemployed who won’t be spending money on going on holiday. Let’s say though that it’s not that bad, and is only as bad as the mini recession of the early 1990s. That lasted for four years, and I remember ex airline pilots with 10,000 hours sitting in the right seat of Navajos for no pay, just to get a bit of flying on empty sectors, and people coming out of Oxford in 1991 and taking six years to find a job. Add to that the unemployed pilots from Airlines around the UK and expats coming back from all over the world and sadly I can’t really share the optimism. Let’s just hope I’m wrong.
|
I think that a big problem is that the likes of ReallyAnnoyed have been stuck at home too long without seeing the real world out there. Not at all their fault, but it does limit their viewpoint.
To see airport after airport after airport full of parked up and sealed aeroplanes (I'm not talking about remote 'storage' airports, I'm talking about normal 'every day' airports), to see totally deserted airport terminals and to see the Departure Board in the terminal of one of the world's major international airports on what should be a hectic bank holiday with only five flights on it -- things are bad. Trying to bang on about maintaining Ts&Cs just does not fit into that real world out there. Taking whatever is needed to keep as many pilots in employment and avoid them having to worry about "Working Life After Flying" is most important right now. Please do NOT try to confuse this situation with any other. It is totally unlike any other. I will repeat the graph from 'Flight' that I posted some time back: https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....69c2b65d0a.jpg Not a single situation that anyone has tried to compare with in the past comes anywhere near this. excrab has it perfectly correct: The time to try to improve terms and conditions is when you have a position to bargain from. |
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
(Post 10808604)
Not a single situation that anyone has tried to compare with in the past comes anywhere near this.
excrab has it perfectly correct: Best right now is to try to look after each other and ensure that as many pilots stay in work for as long as possible... |
Did the generation that tends to moan about the downward curve the most do anything when self-funded type ratings became a big thing? Nothing. Did they do much to stop P2F? Not really. Bogus self-employment contracts for the new entrants? Let them be! Because why bother when it's only a concern to the youngsters? And that was the case right until it crept upon everyone, young and old.
Nobody other than you can (or will) defend your own interests. Forget about anyone campaigning to make your life any better, nobody will bother and nobody will take the associated risks. Even in the best of times, everyone's priority is their own welfare. Also, nobody other than you can judge what's in your best interests right now. For someone, not working for 2 years in hopes of returning to the same package as in January afterwards might be the way to go. For many, it's not. Those many simply can't survive those 2 years without work - and their alternatives on the ground will not bring them any sizable fraction of the reduced package. Some might call it trolling or whatever. I really, really wish it was... As much as we try to deny it, that's the reality of life. |
Nothing wrong with that - and it's absolutely understandable in the light of how many carriers treated their personnel in the past months. As long as you are happy with your choice, it's all well and good. And you certainly won't be alone as in the past weeks many colleagues have made a similar choice simply because of being totally demoralised by the obnoxious treatment they received.
Best of luck in your new career! |
I'm reaching similar conclusions. Doing this fulltime in a low cost company now at reduced salary, what's the point? I'm just hoping they won't be able to max us out for a few years because of this virus.
It's an utter absurdity how on the one hand you'll have thousands of unemployed pilots doing nothing and on the other hand a layer of us "lucky ones" who can be exploited even more, on random rosters doing close to 900 hours a year. |
Indeed.
Most airlines would obviously rather not hire two people on part time due to training overheads but those of us who genuinely benefit from such arrangements, and I know this will be controversial, would gladly cover those costs. I know many will wheep at hearing this and it is a slippery road (possibly, unless enshrined in union agreement) but for me at least, it's more important I'm regularly practicing my other trade than it is to lose a couple of grand on training expenses. Incoming! :\ |
TBH,
the chances of doing this again , full time, part time or at all are fairly slim. The competition for any posts worldwide will be enormous , and not only that, so will competition for jobs across all other sectors including McJobs. I awake everyday to a desolate wasteland ! |
The race to the bottom is reaching a point where safety will become compromised. Aviation remains very safe statistically but the bean counters are playing with fire and morale is at rock-bottom.
The technology and infrastructure are simply not there to easily replace us. So you may end up with a situation in the next few decades where aviation becomes less safe, with button pushers on low wages with no actual airmanship or exposure to "real flying", and you can only rely on technology for so much. |
That's the thing, there's a day after today and a day after tomorrow. Right now, there's a shortage of ANY good jobs in ANY industry. Even IT guys who were first thought to be recession-proof are being made redundant en masse.
But what do we do when things pick up? Skilled personnel will be needed again. And in large numbers. In the context of aviation, even if we assume that recovery to 2019 levels and further growth will not happen until 2024, there will still be a lot of retirements in that period, hence a need for someone to replace those people. Not to mention that some pilots who are still far from retirement age are walking away voluntarily - and someone will have to replace them as well. There might be loads of wannabes out there, but you can't run an airline on 200-hour cadets only. |
I do know some pilots who have decided to leave the industry now... early retirement and hopefully some other part time work... they have simply had enough and would like to return to a more normal life with their friends and families. For those of us who do stick around, I suspect that the job market will start to pick up again next year. One interesting point to consider is the long term impact of less people starting their training in 2020 and possibly even in 2021. The state of the industry will put many off from starting their training and others may be forced to delay for financial reasons.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.