PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   DEP at Ryanair (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/539989-dep-ryanair.html)

space pig 21st June 2014 13:37

Indeed.200 hr fo's cannot fly and the question is if they ever will as hand flying is not encouraged for the same reason,and the question is if the paying public should be exposed to an completely inexpercienced pilot learning to fly an airliner aircraft.

The american system is often critised but i believe they have the one of the most experienced pilots in the cockpit in the world.

And before all the loco 3000 hr captains (soon 2500 hr captains)start jumping up: yes you were a a 200 hr co too, but unlike the typerating you bought, experience is not for sale..nor is any of your 1500 hrs so called picus time of any real value.

The FAA has a point, 1500 hrs should be a minimum.a co-pilot should be an assistent not a student , the job is demanding enough as it is.

My personal opinion that is

TypeIV 21st June 2014 14:22

And these 25000hr astronauts seem to be unable to stick to the topic of a simple thread :p

ETOPS240 21st June 2014 15:13

Yes, because in the last few months in the US, we haven't had:

A WN 737 written off in LGA.
A WN 737 landing at the wrong airport, very nearly being a hull loss.
A UPS A300 crash due to ineptitude on the instrument approach.
A US A320 bent (write-off) due to the pilots abhorring T/O after V1.

Seems like a great system. FAA training is a global joke.

In the US, pilots of boeings are experienced. This goes to show that experience does not equal safety.

7Q Off 21st June 2014 15:46

I was a 200 hs fresh cpl too and to be honest I wasnt qualified to handle a RHS of a 737 at that time. Probably Now neither but thats a different story. And if I was a fresh cpl now with 200 hs and ant company offers me a 737 RHS I would take it without hesitate. Everyone here would probably take the jobi. This doesnt mean I am still qualified for the job.

Building experience with different jobs is a very good career path before RHS of a big jet.

The Range 21st June 2014 17:37

Space, it's because the paying public is not aware of that.

7Q Off 21st June 2014 18:14

As long they can fly cheap most people dont care. Not only in europe.

Breitling_ 22nd June 2014 09:57

Experienced F/O - RYR Assessement
 
Hi, Does anybody have any information about the assessment day for the 'experienced F/O' selections by RYR at STN?

Thanks :)

justagigolo77 22nd June 2014 17:24

I think the best info you could get would be to hope that you strike out and don't move further in that bull :mad: company!

Lead 23rd June 2014 23:41

Are you mental?

Big Pistons Forever 26th June 2014 04:23


Originally Posted by ETOPS240 (Post 8531415)
Yes, because in the last few months in the US, we haven't had:

A WN 737 written off in LGA.
A WN 737 landing at the wrong airport, very nearly being a hull loss.
A UPS A300 crash due to ineptitude on the instrument approach.
A US A320 bent (write-off) due to the pilots abhorring T/O after V1.

Seems like a great system. FAA training is a global joke.

In the US, pilots of boeings are experienced. This goes to show that experience does not equal safety.

Last year the US mainline jet operators had the lowest rate of accidents per 100,000 hours in the world. This trend has been the case for every year for the last 20 years. FAA ratings are a joke ? :rolleyes: I don't think so. What is a joke is thinking passing a bunch of ATPL exams full of stupid arcane and utterly irrelevant questions but having no actual experience actually flying an airplane is a sensible system for selecting aircrew.

Personally I like the idea of flying on a US airline where the brand new new hire FO has more experience than the Captain of the European LOCO Boing/Airbus....

latetonite 26th June 2014 04:32

Am afraid I have to agree.

10checks 26th June 2014 10:29

Back to FR?
 
Hi guys here's my situation. I left ryanair only a few months ago. Joined another airline who also operates 737's from northern UK. I was told the OCC and line training will take 4-6weeks. You'll be on half pay for that time until line checked. Oh and because you have a rating it's only 10 sectors. okay! Arrive in this happy low cost carrier... now minimum of 20 sectors, and six months later... still on half pay (1500 a month) waiting for the full pay this month. It took 5 months to do two weeks of ground school, 3 days of sims and and 20 sectors. So I wonder will FR take me back as the roster is rubbish it does not facilitate a commute. The pay once on full is better I'll agree. I did leave on good terms etc.

latetonite 26th June 2014 10:52

From the frying pan into the fire, I gather.

16024 26th June 2014 13:56

Re: Back to FR?
 
If you object to taking home 1500 for doing nothing over the winter, go back.
Why did you leave?

ScouseGeordie 26th June 2014 15:45

10Checks,

You need to scream that loud from the rafters. What a pile of %!@*#!$ rogues. The louder you scream then the more will hopefully not fall into that trap.

FERetd 26th June 2014 17:18

Overheads?
 
16024 Quote "If you object to taking home 1500 for doing nothing over the winter, go back."

Perhaps 1500 does not cover 10checks' expenses. Perhaps 10checks would rather earn more by working more and provide better for his family.

Sitting at home, doing nothing, with insufficient money is not a lot of fun.

Just suggesting.

nick14 26th June 2014 18:29

Some of the best guys I have trained have had very few hours and some of the worst have had over 10k.

Logged hours doesn't mean everything, if it's preceded by poor quality training, lax operation and questionable operators it's dangerous to think hours will save you in a problem.

10checks 26th June 2014 18:30

well I know in FR we had a month of earning nada... Which was one of the reasons I left. But 6months on 1500pm is just madness (9K in my hand so far and it's June!!!). If I had known I would have stayed. I feel the whole experience has left a very bad taste in my mouth and things were crap in FR but at least commuting was simple and I got to be pissed off around people who did a great job of cheering me up and seeing the positives in life. As I'm here and can't afford to commute- next stop- St John of Gods!! It's a choice over T&C's and better pay (once you get the bloody thing) over a steady commutable roster. I believe the saying 'you can't have your cake and eat it' comes nicely to play here!!:uhoh:

captplaystation 26th June 2014 19:47

10checks,

sorry to be so blunt, but you didn't really do your homework did you ?


I have read enough Jet2 threads on here to know what to expect (and that was merely as a totally disinterested casual bystander with no intention whatsoever of working for them . . .well ALC if it was permanent might feature on my last-ditch back up plans)

Surely, if you intended to go there you could have learned so much more before making the move, I would imagine many before you had the same experience.

Always unwise to rush headlong out of a :mad: situation into one that turns out to be just as odious, but you failed to forecast it for lack of due diligence.

Silly Chap :=

16024 26th June 2014 20:32

Indeed.
And you shouldn't make, or regret a career decision based on a single winter of low pay, after everything you've gone through to get to this stage.
You will be better off from now on, and no more worrying about how you're going to get to Estonia for an early start on Monday.
As for being cheered up by your oppo, it always seemed to me that the only positive note was that he/she usually had a horror story that trumped mine.
Also remember the no pay at all till the line training started, and 20 sectors? Remind me how many you had to do at FR...
And edit: to make sense of any of that it's a reply to 10checks, not captplaystation.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.