I just put the salary they advertised for the euroflyer position ..
|
Makes sense, thanks 👍🏻
|
I don’t recall such a question being asked during the last recruitment process. I’m not quite sure why it’s being asked, as my understanding is pay isn’t based on previous experience or individual performance.
Indeed the application form appears to have been ‘streamlined’ and is now basically very much ‘upload your CV, answer this one question and good luck!’ Notwithstanding the above, I’d echo the advice to answer any questions put carefully. |
Originally Posted by Phantom4
(Post 11273458)
You should answer the questions very carefully and spend considerable time on the application up to a week.
The HR department can spot the ‘back of a fag packet’ responses,they’ve seen it hundreds of times before. Before submission ask your soulmate to critique it.. When you reach the interview stage,download IAG Financial Results for 2021.Enormous amount of information including sections such as the threats facing the company.You need to present yourself as someone who stands out for the right reasons.Good Luck. |
Hans,I think with respect you are missing my point.Having been on the team a question often asked was ‘what are the threats facing The Company’ This is not exclusive to Flight Ops.
Good Luck. |
Originally Posted by hans brinker
(Post 11273679)
When is the last time management came in the crewroom and asked: "Nigel(lette), what should we do, the shareholders aren't happy?". The only reason for a pilot to know about the financial performance of the company they are applying for, is to make sure they can pay him. HR should be interested if they are a good pilot. HR asking pilots about company financials makes as much sense as HR asking accountants applying at BA to recite 747 engine fire memory items. And yes, with this attitude I will not get hired at BA, Got it, Thanks!
|
Slightly off topic but where on earth do LHR short haul Nigels live? Quick glance at rentals in West London is enough to make your eyes water.
|
Originally Posted by SpamCanDriver
(Post 11273801)
It shows that the person is keen to get the job & is willing to put in the extra work to get it
Originally Posted by Phantom4
(Post 11273794)
Hans,I think with respect you are missing my point.Having been on the team a question often asked was ‘what are the threats facing The Company’ This is not exclusive to Flight Ops.
Good Luck. |
Originally Posted by Seosan
(Post 11273876)
Slightly off topic but where on earth do LHR short haul Nigels live? Quick glance at rentals in West London is enough to make your eyes water.
|
Originally Posted by Seosan
(Post 11273876)
Slightly off topic but where on earth do LHR short haul Nigels live? Quick glance at rentals in West London is enough to make your eyes water.
You can start further away down the M4 or up the M40 but you’re into petrol cost and sometimes hotels before earlies and extra duty hours at the beginning and end of your day sitting on the motorway in traffic. Best stretching it as far as you can feel comfortable driving without dipping frequently into hotel before duties territory. That’s the road to notown doing that long term. You’ll blow lots of your time off and money on hotels and fuel just to do the job and it’ll drive you crackers eventually. I’m in that position, not by choice. I think it’s sometimes overlooked that BA agreed pay is fairly good but it’s perversely a very expensive job to do. Either upping one’s life to live nearby or spending £300-£900 a month getting to and from work with hotels/petrol or flights. That’s £3k-£9k a year allowing for leave. So as a commuter knock £5k min off the annual salary (and the delta too) My advice if you’re looking at doing the BA thing with years on SH is draw a circle around Heathrow based on a radius of time factoring in you’ll have been operating knackered for long duties. It won’t actually be a proper circle as going too far round the M25 means 30/45 mins say is awful close whereas it’ll arc out a little more down the M4. (On a bad time of the day 30 mins still has you watching aircraft take off above your car just outside Heathrow) Good luck. |
Originally Posted by Jack the rabbit
(Post 11274231)
Good luck.
|
...
I just put the salary they advertised for the euroflyer position .. See the BA Delta thread - https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearm...pay-cut-2.html - and the BA pilots current ballot on the subject. You might wish to factor that into your salary expectation and the advertised salary. Warning - Questioning the Delta or why Easy LGW pilots get paid 50 % more for the same job, or mentioning the ongoing Osborne/BA Employment Tribunal case - https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribun...841-slash-2020 - may well be fail points. Good luck to you all ... LFH ... |
I've been told by 2 close colleagues already working at BA that they're confident that the 'delta' doesn't apply to new colleagues (something that everyone - almost rightly - seems to be dearly bitter about). Contradicts the consensus on here though that Delta will apply to everyone - Anyone got a concrete answer?
I think it'd be a difficult pill to swallow when you're asked to sign a contract with a stated pay scale and then someone says "actually, we're running a payout at the moment so this isn't accurate.." |
Originally Posted by GetTheQRH
(Post 11276414)
I've been told by 2 close colleagues already working at BA that they're confident that the 'delta' doesn't apply to new colleagues (something that everyone - almost rightly - seems to be dearly bitter about). Contradicts the consensus on here though that Delta will apply to everyone - Anyone got a concrete answer?
I think it'd be a difficult pill to swallow when you're asked to sign a contract with a stated pay scale and then someone says "actually, we're running a payout at the moment so this isn't accurate.." PRP (redundant pilots) do not have the delta paycut, new hires externally, do. as mentioned previously in the thread. |
Originally Posted by balpalover69
(Post 11276656)
PRP (redundant pilots) do not have the delta paycut, new hires externally, do. as mentioned previously in the thread.
|
Originally Posted by Seosan
(Post 11276663)
With the best will in the world (and an understanding that airlines throw logic and reasoning out the window regularly), why would a new hire be expected to take the ‘delta’? If the purpose was to save jobs and retain talent through the various hold pools that are now empty, why would the delta continue, let alone be a burden of an external hire? Do the PRP waive the pay cut simply due to being based at Gatters?
Pools might be empty but BA pilots/ balpa signed the delta deal in 2020, doesn't mean it goes away. You might sign a mortgage, if your house price falls doesn't mean the mortgage goes away just because the market has changed... If said new hire doesn't want the delta, no one is forcing them to submit the application and go through a three-step hiring process to join. |
Originally Posted by balpalover69
(Post 11276677)
Pools might be empty but BA pilots/ balpa signed the delta deal in 2020, doesn't mean it goes away.
Edit: to use the mortgage example, if you signed a 3% interest mortgage and were stuck in it and then they advertised a new rate of 2% to new customers, why would the new customer have to accept the 3% just because you did historically? |
Wasn’t the danger that a new entrant could be on a higher salary than a pilot currently working for BA?
|
If new hires didn’t pay it, there’d be 3 scales. The A scale- PP24 people paying a delta. The B scale - you guys- new joiners not paying a delta and the C scale - current PP34 pilots hit with the delta.
The terms they will trumpet in Q and As are the terms we’ve seen challenged year on year For what it’s worth there’s hardly a non management pilot that thinks anyone should be paying this permanant (if you’re over 30 something) pay cut/tax |
Originally Posted by Seosan
(Post 11276697)
Thanks. Makes sense, I guess quite the faux pas from BA BALPA to let that be indefinite.
Edit: to use the mortgage example, if you signed a 3% interest mortgage and were stuck in it and then they advertised a new rate of 2% to new customers, why would the new customer have to accept the 3% just because you did historically? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:55. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.