Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Upgrade to B737CPT or switch to FO widebody

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Upgrade to B737CPT or switch to FO widebody

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th February 2025 | 07:35
  #41 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 396
Likes: 8
From: UK
Worth noting that previous command is only good for so long.

I know of a couple of examples where former high hours in the left hand seat pilots, have gone long haul wide body right hand seat, only to find that they spent long enough as an FO to be deemed out of recency to go direct entry short haul command .

Type ratings laps, recency lapses, and ultimately time not spent in the left, dealing with the stress and making those decisions, disappears too. Airlines know this, so I would say a foray to a different carrier to fly wide body, would have to be a short one to increase chances of keeping a command on a return to short haul / new carrier.
Akrapovic is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2025 | 20:21
  #42 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 573
Likes: 296
From: https://youtube.com/watch?v=P8pihdksUHk&si=t_GX3ubmBvZ2CDgB
Any Captain position, is preferable to any F/O position..IMHO. At some of these big outfits, having to wait 20 years for a command, for example is not good. A lot of the command mentality is lost, for good.
The younger you are the better
However, command may not be for everyone. Everyone is not suitable for command .
I have known weasel "Captains" blame the F/O when there has been a screwup. The buck stops with the P in C. Responsibility , cannot be delegated. "If the cap fits, wear it."
RichardJones is online now  
Reply
Old 22nd June 2025 | 14:20
  #43 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 14
Likes: 3
From: Europe
Props to you pal, glad you got the right side of the coin toss you faced 3 years ago!
FutureCommander is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2025 | 09:21
  #44 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 171
Likes: 72
From: north of Harlow and south of Cambridge
I agree!

Originally Posted by RMP2
I’ve flown as PIC on our A330 and I’ve realized that widebody wasn’t for me; too much fuel in the tanks; it’s very boring. I am now back flying the A321neo and I love it. I would definitely go for the B737Cpt job.
the 777 and 787 do look beautiful, but the hard reality of the prospect of looking out those windows, usually deep water, for hours on end kept peeping up in my background thoughts.

The 737 carries the max fuel I could manage: max 5 hours before one could at least get out and walk around the aircraft and breathe the local air, before the 5 hours back home, to your car, your house, your bed, with your partner, children, cat or dog, or alone.
70 Mustang is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2025 | 17:09
  #45 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 180
From: USA
Originally Posted by 70 Mustang
the 777 and 787 do look beautiful, but the hard reality of the prospect of looking out those windows, usually deep water, for hours on end kept peeping up in my background thoughts.

The 737 carries the max fuel I could manage: max 5 hours before one could at least get out and walk around the aircraft and breathe the local air, before the 5 hours back home, to your car, your house, your bed, with your partner, children, cat or dog, or alone.
Just flew ANC-IAD in a 737, almost 8 block and it was a redeye, in a small cramped cockpit. Not saying I would prefer longhaul, but it often more than 5 for me.
hans brinker is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2025 | 18:59
  #46 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 171
Likes: 72
From: north of Harlow and south of Cambridge
aux fuel tanks then?

Originally Posted by hans brinker
Just flew ANC-IAD in a 737, almost 8 block and it was a redeye, in a small cramped cockpit. Not saying I would prefer longhaul, but it often more than 5 for me.
5 was a “long” flight for our base. 4 something to the Canaries and Athens and Rhodes were the other “long” routes. Plenty for me.

it only took a few 8 or more hour flights in the Herc to remove all the “glamour” from longhaul flight in my estimation.
70 Mustang is offline  
Reply
Old 9th July 2025 | 06:57
  #47 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 339
From: Hong Kong
It really depends what you're flying. The 737 is small and cramped compared to the 777 with a bunk. Having flown both long and short haul at the same time you definitely become accustomed to the type of flying you're doing and an 8 or 9 hour flight can fly by quickly. When you go from that to SH a 1 or 2 hour sector seems instantaneous. Return to LH and an 8 hour sector feels like forever, but after a couple you get used to it again.
rudestuff is offline  
Reply
Old 9th July 2025 | 07:04
  #48 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 171
Likes: 72
From: north of Harlow and south of Cambridge
Not to mention…

The long term health effects of short sectors vs long haul.
70 Mustang is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.