Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

British airways pension to close.

Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

British airways pension to close.

Old 24th Oct 2017, 20:42
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 382
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy
BA for years have had an SOP of always, always pleading poverty when the employees want or need anything, but I'm darned sure there's at least some more money to be had, maybe not for a complete restoration of NAPS, but there's certainly room for improvement on BAs proposals, without any need for any magic.
That would be sensible if BA had been a successful, profitable airline forthe last decade, without the demands for change. The sad fact is that BA only cane out of the red after making the necessary changes.

In many ways BA is a bit like Alitalia - its employees wanting more (which anyone is entitled to ask for) but working in a business that simply cannot afford it.

One day, BA will go bankrupt like so many British companies, simply because its staff refuse to accept the reality that the world changes every single day and for many roles, it frankly doesnt take much education or skill to do the job and so people are easily replaceable.
GrahamO is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2017, 22:51
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London, Monte Carlo and Bermuda (I wish!)
Age: 80
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by avtur007
Stormin norman - probably better off keeping that scotch instead of drinking it, although having a large one does sound good! A decent bottle unopened left in the attic for a few years will gain value as the supply of that drop drys up. Theres a Massive demand for quality scotch and is getting bigger all the time. Hard not to drink a good bottle though and need a few in the attic to really make money, but just knowing you have a rare bottle of 50 year old to drink when your pension fails you is comforting.
Take care, Scotch does not improve in the bottle, only in the cask, So it's value doesn't go up except in terms of its rarity. Best to drink it now and drown your sorrows. Same with Champagne.
Mr Oleo Strut is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2017, 00:29
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,487
Received 141 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by GrahamO
That would be sensible if BA had been a successful, profitable airline forthe last decade, without the demands for change. The sad fact is that BA only cane out of the red after making the necessary changes.

In many ways BA is a bit like Alitalia - its employees wanting more (which anyone is entitled to ask for) but working in a business that simply cannot afford it.

One day, BA will go bankrupt like so many British companies, simply because its staff refuse to accept the reality that the world changes every single day and for many roles, it frankly doesnt take much education or skill to do the job and so people are easily replaceable.
According to this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britis...usiness_trends

Last ten years profits are pretty damn good.
TURIN is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2017, 10:00
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Uk
Age: 42
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GrahamO.......really? Years of command experience is easily replaceable? The facts are that BA for pilots on the 34pps is little different and and some cases considerably less than our low cost competitors at early stages of your career and just about comparable overall. Friends of mine in the LCC earn more for the same roll than I currently do.
bex88 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2017, 10:48
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Anywhere crewing send me
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Oleo Strut
Take care, Scotch does not improve in the bottle, only in the cask, So it's value doesn't go up except in terms of its rarity. Best to drink it now and drown your sorrows. Same with Champagne.
And port apparently, never knew that.
Bob8052 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2017, 20:08
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 382
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by TURIN
According to this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britis...usiness_trends

Last ten years profits are pretty damn good.
You have a very poor assessment of what good profit is - single digits with massive capital investment requirements so hardly somewhere to invest in, and you completely missed the point I made that such numbers are AFTER the changes which you object to. Look at the numbers in red and those are the world you want to live in, albeit for a short time before the P45.
GrahamO is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2017, 20:13
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 382
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by bex88
GrahamO.......really? Years of command experience is easily replaceable?
How many tens of thousands of pilots are there ? Yes, pilots have some platform unique training, but there are still a lot of pilots around and there are plenty of people who want to do the job.

How many hundreds of thousands of cabin crew are there ? How easy is it to train and replace one ? Does it take a degree and four years education before they start crew training - No. Could you take someone out of a cafe and train them in a few weeks - yes. Sorry folks but cabin crew are a commodity these days.

Yes, easily replaceable - I understand why people here don't like that as it suggest they are not as special as they think they are.
GrahamO is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2017, 22:02
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GrahamO
How many tens of thousands of pilots are there ? Yes, pilots have some platform unique training, but there are still a lot of pilots around and there are plenty of people who want to do the job.
Adam Smith had a few things to say about that in 1776 in the Wealth Of Nations. Substitute any occupation that requires a great deal of expense or career risk for that of the law student in Smith's example.
10.1.25 The probability that any particular person shall ever be qualified for
the employment to which he is educated, is very different in different occupations.
In the greater part of mechanic trades, success is almost certain; but very
uncertain in the liberal professions. Put your son apprentice to a shoemaker,
there is little doubt of his learning to make a pair of shoes: But send him
to study the law, it is at least twenty to one if ever he makes such proficiency
as will enable him to live by the business. In a perfectly fair lottery, those
who draw the prizes ought to gain all that is lost by those who draw the blanks.
In a profession where twenty fail for one that succeeds, that one ought to
gain all that should have been gained by the unsuccessful twenty. The
counsellor at law who, perhaps, at near forty years of age, begins to
make something by his profession, ought to receive the retribution, not only
of his own so tedious and expensive education, but of that of more than
twenty others who are never likely to make any thing by it.

How extravagant soever the fees of counsellors at law may sometimes
appear, their real retribution is never equal to this.
ICAO gives essential the same argument as Smith.

POTENTIAL SAFETY RISKS CAUSED BY PILOT SHORTAGE, SECOND HIGH-LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE 2015 (HLSC 2015) PLANNING FOR GLOBAL AVIATION SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
1.3 High cost of pilot license, entry-level low wages and reduced career interest. For many students the cost of obtaining the license is a challenge and the low wages for job entry-level pilots (e.g., approximately $22 400 in the United States) is a deterrent when faced with the perspective of having to repay the substantial debt incurred to obtain the license, which may be well in excess of $100 000. Furthermore, other industries (e.g., IT, medicine, banking, etc.) are more appealing to younger generations than aviation.
Can you offer a cogent rebuttal to Smith and ICAO?
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2017, 07:35
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: england
Posts: 856
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
No....sadly flying has become a vocation. There are many threads on who to blame.
hunterboy is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2017, 07:42
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Button Moon
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morning all,

I’ll just leave this here...

BA owner IAG predicts travel demand to fuel profit rise | Article [AMP] | Reuters

IAG operating profit up by over 20% in a single year and full year profits expected to be €3bn. All wonderful news of course but I hope BALPA and the other unions make the best of this info.
2 Whites 2 Reds is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2017, 08:08
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to see which of the IAG group made the most profit ?
stormin norman is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2017, 18:17
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between Foxrock and a hard place
Posts: 115
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It'll be Aer Lingus, on a 'pound-for-pound' basis. Obviously BA will make the most in an absolute sense but Aer Lingus are very lean and have an enviable profit margin going on at the minute.
sprite1 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2017, 04:58
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A quick look at the BA balance sheet is interesting.

Privatisation was a great way to offload a public liability to the private sector, with enough inducements the floated. Ahh Maggie a gift to Empire!

With that done and dupes holding shares, it was a matter a demographics; BA has always looked to the finance community like a pension fund with an airline attached. Suspending belief in the reality that what can't be paid won't meant brokers traded the stock up and down.

IAG offers Willie (second cousin of Alan Joyce) cost base leverage. It will be interesting to see how it plays out, but sadly privatising profits and socialising losses is second nature to the corporate these days
Rated De is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2017, 22:29
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A quick look at the BALPA website tells me the union has already rolled over before the consultation period has finished - no change there then.
stormin norman is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 00:08
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: southeast
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BALPA? BA mgmt by proxy
sidtheesexist is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2017, 11:36
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,487
Received 141 Likes on 78 Posts
You have a very poor assessment of what good profit is - single digits with massive capital investment requirements so hardly somewhere to invest in, and you completely missed the point I made that such numbers are AFTER the changes which you object to. Look at the numbers in red and those are the world you want to live in, albeit for a short time before the P45.
The numbers in red have got bugger all to do with the pension scheme. There were several other reasons BA declared losses there.

Profit is profit. The accountants will do their thing and declared profits will reflect exactly the numbers required (assuming the revenue is there). I filled in a tax form this year which included a disposal of a taxable asset. It is amazing how little tax you need to pay when you read the 'rules'. Lewis Hamilton and the cast of Mrs Browns Boys have nothing on corporate tax avoidance!

A projected 3 Billion profit this year is obscene when cutting the pay of the employees who created that profit.
Oh, and I'm sure the leadership of BA /IAG will be handsomely rewarded for such record profits, along side the pension fund managers.
And people wonder why there is a resurgence in support for Corbyn's socialism.
TURIN is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2017, 12:40
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think, sir, you have a good point.
macdo is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2017, 13:51
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: uk
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can I ask. How is this influencing current pilots plans? Firstly, will people be postponing retirement a few more years? Are people less able to do part-time now?
Or do you see people leaving to the likes of China to fill the shortfall, as mentioned in a previous comment?
World Flyer is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2017, 09:16
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by parabellum
Turin - I can remember back in the late nineties I did a layover in Jo'burg, BA used the same hotel then, in Rosebank, I think. In the hotel at the same time as us was the first Hamble cadet to reach retirement age, (possibly 55?), if what we were told was true and not a wind up this Captain was retiring with 100K lump sum and an annual pension of around 80K. Does this mean that you are now going to have to make do with an annual pension of only 65K?
Yes, those numbers would be credible for an APS contributor and even more so if they took the " crystalization" option at 50 yrs, which many did. I joined NAPS in NOV 1987, one of the first to do so.

Many of my colleagues a few years senior were in APS and their full career pensions were certainly 80k-110k range plus lump sum.
VAMY is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2017, 13:27
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by World Flyer
Can I ask. How is this influencing current pilots plans? Firstly, will people be postponing retirement a few more years? Are people less able to do part-time now?
Or do you see people leaving to the likes of China to fill the shortfall, as mentioned in a previous comment?
I think that the vast majority of pilots will simply be poorer in retirement than their forebears. The DB genie cannot be put back into the bottle, so we will all work longer (55 to 60 to 65 already happened, 67 to 70 in the pipeline), have our benefits capped (max contribution to pension reduced year on year since the start of the millenia), low returns on investments and low interest rates probably set for years to come. I'm not convinced that even selling your soul to the Chinese will net you an APS style pension at the age it was available.
Watch the Budget this week to see what the next slap in the face will be for the fiscally prudent, then be very glad you aren't a 25 year old FO.
macdo is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.