Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Minimum hours for widebody command


Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Minimum hours for widebody command

Old 30th October 2015 | 18:44
  #1 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 2
From: Sutton
Minimum hours for widebody command

Searched the forums and cannot find which carrier has the lowest hour requirement for a Long Haul widebody command.

With BA I understand it is typically 15 years which at say 800 hours a year is 12,000 hours on 50 Ton plus jet equipment. I believe there are airlines offering commands with half this any one know of (or have a view on anything lower)?
RMC is offline  
Reply
Old 30th October 2015 | 19:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
I think you'll find the BA matter has to do with seniority not experience & competence. There are airlines that operate only wide-bodies. So in those companies it is another expectation entirely. 15 years of doing the same thing before command seems overly long. If you are in a wide-body company you should be able to learn the ropes much quicker.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th October 2015 | 20:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: UK
My company you need a total time of 3000 hours to be considered.
A320baby is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2015 | 14:19
  #4 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 2
From: Sutton
A320baby is that 3,000 hours for a wide body/ dual aisle type.The lowest I have found is Qatar with 5,000 hours total time required for their 777 fleet. Of course The BA requirement is seniority based....but that is typical of many European and every US long haul carrier. The end result is the same that it is rare to see wide body aircraft being Comanded by guys with much less than 10,000 hours.
RMC is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2015 | 15:32
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 654
Likes: 4
From: Dublin
With us it was you could be considered with over 6500 jet and 4000 command on jet medium but in reality I don't think you get a look in much below 10000 hrs and it was advertised two years ago with 11500 tt
Kirks gusset is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2015 | 20:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
Flying a WB is no more difficult than a NB, just different. If the WB is operated on long-haul intercontinental routes then the BIG difference is management of the operation and all that such an operation - ATC- mother nature - politics- fuel planning - crew/pax issues - hotel/handling issues etc. etc can throw at you. This requires exposure and experience. It has absolutely nothing to do with flying hours. In companies who operate only WB's then 5-6 years might be enough to have seen the whole network and some of the problems. That's about 5000hrs, but it is 6 years relevant exposure. If you are in a mixed fleet company then 4-5 year short haul with easy options and ground assistance at hand, followed by another 4-5 years to learn the long-haul operation is reasonable. IMHO 4 years short-haul then 1 year long-haul might not be enough even if it = 4000hrs.
Just consider the dynamics: 5 years = 4000hrs, but you are still 26 years old. The purser is 40, all the cabin crew are >30, the F/O is 30. Would it be wise????? to be LHS? There are hours ands there are hours, but then there are years.
I flew WB long-haul charter for a couple of charter companies who were WB only, but not for too long, and as there was no expansion or retirement the issue of upgrades didn't raise in my time. Cathay has WB only. I know they have regional and then long-haul. What is their policy? IHMO taking a $200m a/c & 500pax and >15 crew to the other side of the world in all climates, both weather & political, would need 10 years exposure of aviation, most of it relevant. At least that would get you north of 30 years old.

Last edited by RAT 5; 31st October 2015 at 22:41.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2015 | 11:46
  #7 (permalink)  
EAM
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 662
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere in time
If you look at the smaller airlines, charter airlines who operate widebodys you will find a lot of CPTs with less than 10.000h, or just take DHK, a few 767 CPTs have a lot less than 10.000h, same with the SunExpress on their new A330, same with Air Italy or Blue Panorama in Italy.
EAM is offline  
Reply
Old 5th November 2015 | 09:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 285
Likes: 1
From: bkk
WIDEBODY

I have spent most of the past 25 years upgrading pilots to the Left Seat of a wide-body.The only criteria with respect to hours has been laid down by the insurance company, and almost without exception these are 5,000 hours total time, can be virtually anything,including helicoptor time (factored at 50%), but at least some heavy turboprop or small jet preferred, all F/O is okay, plus around 1,000 hours on the wide-body type itself (to gauge the pilots suitability).I have upgraded a few with only 4,000 hours , but these were guys with exceptional skills and knowledge and the insurer had to be consulted/case put forward.Never seen any issues, but a lot of other ducks need to be lined up in a row to complete the exercise. Peter.....
piratepete is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2015 | 09:19
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
Also, the insurers set a minimum. The industry norm is 2500 min for narrow bodies and 5000 for wide. Any variation tends to attract a premium increase.


Edit: Simultaneous post with Piratepete, although my post shows after his with a prior timestamp - must be a timezone thing.

Both my current and previous companies were upgrading wide-body pilots at 5000.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.