BA?

[Plastic787]

763 jock the problem with that is you are then on a very slippery slope. If you do away with the age limits you're on the way to having a 90 year old Captain responsible for the lives of hundreds of people down the back, up front with one of those much less fit 50 year olds you quoted who barely passes his medical every year. (And that's inevitable too seeing as you're gonna see a lot older FO's sitting in the RHS with Captains who refuse to retire)

He's an exceptional 90 year old and has passed all the checks. But are you really happy with this situation as a passenger? Yes it's at the extreme end of the scale but that's still what you're potentially heading towards. I do not want to expand on my previous analogy except simply to say the line has to be drawn somewhere.

[NigelOnDraft]

Quote:
Which court do you use to challenge ICAO
You don't have to. The 65 age limit is only an ICAO "Recommendation", not a "Standard".
Personnel Licensing FAQ

The recommendation only applies to co-pilots. It is mandated for Captains.

[d71146]

Re post #185

Wish they had a 'like' button sometimes on this forum

[Narrow Runway]

@ NigelonDraft

So, Captains could give up their command and go back in the RHS.

No-one is being disadvantaged. The "aged" captain still has a job and a co-pilot gains their command.

Everybody happy now?

[Plastic787]

Narrow Runway the people trying to get into the company on the bottom rung certainly wouldn't be! ;-)

[Narrow Runway]

Of course. Point taken.

However, those new joiners don't really figure in BA's plans until they're in the system. Therefore, it is difficult to factor their needs into this hypothetical discussion.

[deepknight]

Perhaps Carbheatout could tell me which company is offering this massive pension pot so I can apply before the scheme is closed.