Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

A320 or B737 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2011, 19:58
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have flown all the current Boeings (except B777) and they are a superb product. However I have long been frustrated by the company appearing to loose all impetus to Airbus ... any aviation magazine will have pages of Airbus orders while Boeing are languishing in delays on what will be a very good A/C when released, and reruns of 1960's models. (again B777 excepted, which is cutting edge)

If I was a young player again I would go for Airbus, mainly for their orderbook and almost complete commonality with their larger types.

When I entered the commercial world 17 years ago type ratings were supported by a bond ... so I have never had to pay for a rating. I do however see myself as very fortunate, and that would likely not be the case were I to be entering the industry now. P2F is definitely "subtracting the Michael", but that appears the only option for people to get started .. so maybe we should cut them some slack ?

Good Luck ..
Iron Duke is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 10:27
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL65Driver1234,

Don't know where you get your info from, but transition from 737 to 777 is just a little more than 3 sim sessions.

Perhaps you mean A320 to A330, which I could well understand.

I stand to be corrected however, in which case I look forward to my 777 command very soon
captplaystation is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 15:50
  #23 (permalink)  
doo
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at what dominates in your home market if you ever wish to fly there in the future.
doo is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 17:14
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 1,231
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Off topic:

I flew a microlight, cropspraying bananas in Africa for a year
Now THAT sounds like fun!
Mikehotel152 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 19:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: somewhere on this planet
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

target asia in 5-10 years, but you will be 52.
target asia now, and they will tell you "no expat".

come back to EU with no money and no job, and start towork as a waitress in a bar at 1000 euro/month.

what do you think you are???if it was so easy, everybody would buy a 320 rating and fly in asia!

you see guys, all these middle age men want play the pilot, and have no idea, it s all "me me me", ...they all think with a type rating, airlines will employ them, with or without line hours.

another middle age schmuck I know bought 500h in a EU airline,what a moron, the guy all excited: "OH i hope they hire me with my 500 hours"... the guy had to leave his place for another P2F punk! now he is jobless!!!
can not belive the OP is 42....

dont believe the crap here, most guys who tell you to go for it, are still jobless, but give advice to everybody else, when they are themselves a total failure!!!

it s patetic!

Last edited by captainsuperstorm; 15th Jul 2011 at 20:57.
captainsuperstorm is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2011, 09:49
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 vs A320

The A320 rating will give you access to every airline operating the 318/319/320/321. If you go the boeing route, you will still have to choose between NG and classic, as there is still a fair amount of those flying in SE Asia.

The points made in other threads about your low hours to age ratio and the 500 hours on type have some validity, however I can assure you first hand there are airlines recruiting type rated people with similar profile to yours with no hours on type.

Your plan could be a solution to a quick career fix, the region is booming, and you could be in command of a new shiny jet within no time.

At the end of the day, it is down to you having the confidence to invest in a type rating. I know I did it a few years back and it paid of.
crisp2 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2011, 20:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: somewhere on this planet
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

I can assure you first hand there are airlines recruiting type rated people with similar profile to yours with no hours on type.
tell me which one, punk!
captainsuperstorm is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 01:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vega Constellation
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The microlight was sure a lot of fun, and I felt on top of the world as a first flying job (paid one, I mean). But this business is scary and microlights are underpowered, sluggish on the controls, and far from reliable with Rotax 582 engines (2 stroke).

It was an investment like any other, I had a decent salary, and could afford an FAA training for CPL Multi IR within a year. I made much less money a year later flying a BN2 Islander in the Congo...

There is a difference between an investment and flying for a sandwich, but some Narrow...Minded people have a hard time seeing it. Maybe they would care to explain what they were doing in a low cost if not to get the experience at the expense of better conditions?

If I had to do it again, I'd go fly microlights to fund my flight training again. Thank to this opportunity, I started with zero debt, so moving onto the next job was made a bit smoother I guess.
FLEXPWR is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 04:20
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
B737 gets you Indonesia IF you can work there as an Israeli. Also some Chinese airlines such as Xiamen and Shenzhen.

A320 is India, Singapore, Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Macau, Hong Kong, Philippines.

Probably leans more towards the Airbus in this part of the world especially if you have to cross Indonesia off your list.
Metro man is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 06:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
You are basing what you want to fly on how many orders it has ?




Seriously, this is a factor for you, are you a Pilot or a Salesman ?
stilton is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 08:01
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Sounds sensible to me. I would chose the aircraft which is selling more based on the obvious fact that there are more opportunities for work!
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 15:29
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah i would back exactly what Dan the man said
Aussie is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2011, 10:01
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The IMF.
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flex

Flex,

I now understand that you mustn't be able to read too well....

....In the Wizz thread, I commented that I was under threat of redundancy at Virgin and that is why I joined Wizz.

Additionally, at the same time, Wizz gave me a DEC, based on experience - so I don't think I contributed to undermining any terms and conditions, especially given that I was type rated with 2000+ on type in my logbook, plus many other hours on Boeings and Airbuses.

Would I have joined as an FO? NO!! Would I have paid for a rating in order to join in either seat? NO!!

Anyway, back to topic:

If someone must pay for a rating, I'd go A320......even though I would never do it!!

Last edited by Narrow Runway; 18th Jul 2011 at 10:11.
Narrow Runway is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 09:07
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could always get an A320 type rating, work somewhere in Europe and commute back to TLV on your days off.

בהצלחה
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2011, 11:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 every day of the week! Just look at the Paris Air Show orders and it's not difficult to see which aircraft will be dominating the short haul market in the not too distant future.
Air of Despair is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2011, 15:49
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: somewhere on this planet
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why should they pay you when they can get locals for _ _ _ _ (fill the blank, it starts by F and finish by E.)

answer in a few days, keep tuned!
captainsuperstorm is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2011, 19:04
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Europa
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing has responded with new re-engined 737 (CFM Leap X).

I think Bombardier C Series orders will pick up once she flys - all new design v old 737 and A320s by then. Shame Boeing and Airbus have gone down the iterative change route. No more Concorde/S Shuttle but we have the re-engined 1960s designs!
angelorange is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2011, 20:05
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know where you are coming from, but having had their fingers burned (read incinerated ! ) with the 787/ Dreamliner, Boeing were thinking that medium term, & finally, with a little more fuel efficiency , the FLUF is fine, so go for the cheap option(as indeed Airbus have done finally? with their similar "solution") Why not ? nobody has enough spare cash to re-invent the wheel at the moment.


Forgot to say, for 737/320 family rated guys, rejoice! it wil be same airframe /same rating = less opportunity to be shafted by an accountant
captplaystation is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 13:57
  #39 (permalink)  
n77
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: moved again
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FLEXPWR
I would love to enroll NTPS and do my test pilot course.
Flex
I assume you have Master degree in aeronautical aviation and know how to recover from inverted spin etc. otherwise it's gonna be waste of money
Airbus getting to grips is not enough at that level

Last edited by n77; 31st Jul 2011 at 14:14.
n77 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 16:31
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vega Constellation
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
n77, nice one!

I am not sure a master's degree would be of much help in that very moment, more so the practice and the experience learned from people with more grey hair...I have done the inverted spin once in an aerobatics glider (ASH25 if I recall), with the help of the instructor...still trying to figure out how it all happened...

Anyway the NTPS course is very much about theory, lasts about a year, brings inside understanding. Testing is not about spinning in all directions, unless you be a test pilot for aerobatics.
I doubt any airliner would be doing inverted spins as part of their certification programmes..

Sorry, off topic...

Flex
FLEXPWR is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.