Self-Funded TR at Eastern Airways?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Self-Funded TR at Eastern Airways?
Hi Guys&Gals
Does anyone know or know of anyone joining Eastern Airways recently and NOT having to pay for their TR upfront? Or is the "pay up or bugger off" scenario set in stone? Is there a posibility of negotiating a bond or is that cloud cuckoo land. Thanks all and PM me if you would rather..
Does anyone know or know of anyone joining Eastern Airways recently and NOT having to pay for their TR upfront? Or is the "pay up or bugger off" scenario set in stone? Is there a posibility of negotiating a bond or is that cloud cuckoo land. Thanks all and PM me if you would rather..
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys and gals who have been working for Eastern in ops, crewing, cabin crew etc have been bonded, outsiders have to pay for type rating unless you have thousands of command hours and I am sure they will negotiate as long as you will live in Aberdeen and fly the SAAB
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 38
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So if you have been working as cabin crew for 12 months you dont have to pay upfront the £13 K for a type rating on the jetstream? Or do they just bond you for the cost of that?
In that case what happens to the £8K line training bond?
Cheers
In that case what happens to the £8K line training bond?
Cheers
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Near the rain!
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this speculative questioning? Or those applying have more than 1000hrs?
I just keep getting:
I just keep getting:
Thank you for your enquiry regarding vacancies within Eastern Airways and for taking the time in submitting your resume. Your details have now been forwarded to our Chief Pilot for consideration against any future opportunities.
Please note our current minimum requirements are 1000 hrs total for FO, 3500 total for captains, and 1000 hrs on similar type.
Please note our current minimum requirements are 1000 hrs total for FO, 3500 total for captains, and 1000 hrs on similar type.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Near the rain!
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alph,
Yeah just wondering, I am just over 800hrs, mostly MEP, but still a few months to go before I reach 1000. Was trying to get a guage if cabin crew gave you a leg up at eastern!
Cheers
Yeah just wondering, I am just over 800hrs, mostly MEP, but still a few months to go before I reach 1000. Was trying to get a guage if cabin crew gave you a leg up at eastern!
Cheers
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Midlands
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chaps, not sure how long this min 1000hrs for FOs req't has been in place, but I certainly know of a few bods who have got in the last few years with a lot less than that.
HW
HW
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M33,
It is hit and miss with this outfit. Think long and hard about working in the back of a J41 (not fun if you're tall) for a year on a grand a month with no guarantees, then (if you're lucky) ending up bonded for three years for an unrealistic sum on a poor salary (for an F/O) in Wick.
It is hit and miss with this outfit. Think long and hard about working in the back of a J41 (not fun if you're tall) for a year on a grand a month with no guarantees, then (if you're lucky) ending up bonded for three years for an unrealistic sum on a poor salary (for an F/O) in Wick.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Near the rain!
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SolentFlyer,
Thanks for the advice. I will not be giving up the adhoc flying job ive got to go into the back of an a/c.
Im starting to think that experience for RHS doesnt matter!
Rgds
Thanks for the advice. I will not be giving up the adhoc flying job ive got to go into the back of an a/c.
Im starting to think that experience for RHS doesnt matter!
Rgds
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do you know if these 2 guys are already working in the Company in another capacity?
Regards,
Spr K (rtd.)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alphaadrian, bonded and pay up front arrangements have happened in the past. Not sure how much experience you have but it may alter things a little. If you get the choice the Saab is really the aircraft to go for.
For those who are looking for a start, I would say go for it, apply. Don’t worry too much about the hours requirement, within reason. Just make sure you spend time on your CV. However, I would urge a note of caution with Eastern. Look very hard at what is being offered, how much, how long and where. Some great flight crew and trainers there, but much unhappiness as well. Unstable rosters, low salary, long bonds and the ‘company way’. I would not necessarily think about going the ops or cabin crew route either. Better companies are out there...
PG
For those who are looking for a start, I would say go for it, apply. Don’t worry too much about the hours requirement, within reason. Just make sure you spend time on your CV. However, I would urge a note of caution with Eastern. Look very hard at what is being offered, how much, how long and where. Some great flight crew and trainers there, but much unhappiness as well. Unstable rosters, low salary, long bonds and the ‘company way’. I would not necessarily think about going the ops or cabin crew route either. Better companies are out there...
PG
Educated Hillbilly
I understood that on an intake a few years back several pilots at Eastern were on a loan arrangement, in that the company took loans out in the pilots name to cover the type rating and line training; providing you stayed the company covered the loan for the 3 or 4 year duration, but in the event you leave well the loan is in your name so you are liable.
I wouldn't object to flying turboprops again, but when I work the figures through a sstr and line training package on a 737 or a 320 is actually financially more viable than spending fours years on a Jetstream Fos salary. I am not saying I support pay to fly schemes; but the awful terms at Eastern (and other turboprop oparetors) are actually something that has probably contributed to the popularity of pay to fly schemes.
I wouldn't object to flying turboprops again, but when I work the figures through a sstr and line training package on a 737 or a 320 is actually financially more viable than spending fours years on a Jetstream Fos salary. I am not saying I support pay to fly schemes; but the awful terms at Eastern (and other turboprop oparetors) are actually something that has probably contributed to the popularity of pay to fly schemes.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland mainly, rather than at home.
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Portsharbourflyer
That is a very good point, and true.
However it seems as though the said Jet operators operating pay to fly schemes are themselves coming to the rescue by decreasing terms and conditions for those who are even prepared to shell out for their schemes, including laying off cadets over quiet periods with no strings other than the suggestion that they may be re-hired next season. Perhaps Eastern Airways play on this, either inadvertently, or deliberately?
Anyway, the solution is for all turbo prop operators to pay more, roll on that day, which will never come. Or for fewer pilots to be available, fewer deciding to train. That won't happen either. Perhaps the real answer is for companies like Eastern Airways to realise that investing in their future is a good thing, investing in their staff will generate a return, and will reduce significantly their training costs for those who replace the pilots moving onto pastures new instead of staying for a good lifestyle and reasonable return with a good company who looks after them. It will provide a stable team on which to plan a strong future, and provide for experienced pilots instead of those marking time until the next round of recruitment. It's a mad idea, I know, but it works in many other industries, and is a system exploited by many astute (perhaps now old fashioned) managers.
Then again, what do I know? I'm no accountant after all.
That is a very good point, and true.
However it seems as though the said Jet operators operating pay to fly schemes are themselves coming to the rescue by decreasing terms and conditions for those who are even prepared to shell out for their schemes, including laying off cadets over quiet periods with no strings other than the suggestion that they may be re-hired next season. Perhaps Eastern Airways play on this, either inadvertently, or deliberately?
Anyway, the solution is for all turbo prop operators to pay more, roll on that day, which will never come. Or for fewer pilots to be available, fewer deciding to train. That won't happen either. Perhaps the real answer is for companies like Eastern Airways to realise that investing in their future is a good thing, investing in their staff will generate a return, and will reduce significantly their training costs for those who replace the pilots moving onto pastures new instead of staying for a good lifestyle and reasonable return with a good company who looks after them. It will provide a stable team on which to plan a strong future, and provide for experienced pilots instead of those marking time until the next round of recruitment. It's a mad idea, I know, but it works in many other industries, and is a system exploited by many astute (perhaps now old fashioned) managers.
Then again, what do I know? I'm no accountant after all.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North West
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Self funding is a hard pill to swallow after paying out for all the other training.
The eastern scheme means that you effectively end up working for free for 6 months, which is about the time span it takes you to become useful to them. In return you get a permenant job, a salary (from day 1) , paid holidays, a uniform, staff parking, id pass etc. The training is good, and majority of the staff are friendly and good to work with. You will be kept busy and, whatever your background will learn a great deal.
The 1000 hour is not set in stone, but realistically they need a decent pool of crew who are eligible for command within a year or so of joining, therefore the number of low hours people are kept low.
The company ethos is not to everyones taste, but it has kept us all employed and paid each month during difficult times.
The eastern scheme means that you effectively end up working for free for 6 months, which is about the time span it takes you to become useful to them. In return you get a permenant job, a salary (from day 1) , paid holidays, a uniform, staff parking, id pass etc. The training is good, and majority of the staff are friendly and good to work with. You will be kept busy and, whatever your background will learn a great deal.
The 1000 hour is not set in stone, but realistically they need a decent pool of crew who are eligible for command within a year or so of joining, therefore the number of low hours people are kept low.
The company ethos is not to everyones taste, but it has kept us all employed and paid each month during difficult times.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all your replies and thoughts guys. Very useful.
If I had no job and 200 hours TT then I may be tempted but i have over 2500 TT and am currently in a TP job that pays better than EA! However, EA basings, job stability and personal circumstances would certainly make EA a strong contender for me. Unfortunetly if you then throw "give us 15k upfront" into the mix...EA then become a hell of a lot less desirable for me personally. If Im gonna pay upfront, then i would rather pay 20k for a useful/jet rating where I can earn 30k+ from the outset
If I had no job and 200 hours TT then I may be tempted but i have over 2500 TT and am currently in a TP job that pays better than EA! However, EA basings, job stability and personal circumstances would certainly make EA a strong contender for me. Unfortunetly if you then throw "give us 15k upfront" into the mix...EA then become a hell of a lot less desirable for me personally. If Im gonna pay upfront, then i would rather pay 20k for a useful/jet rating where I can earn 30k+ from the outset
Educated Hillbilly
Everyone, just like to say it is good to see a thread where everyone is making good rational and reasoned counter arguments to my own post without turning this into the usual anti pay to fly slanging match. STS, Horsebox, Alpha Adrian, Mike Hammer, again I wouldn't dispute any of the points you have made and all things that need to be taken into consideration.
I apologise if I am drifting the thread into a more generic SSTR P2F/ Training bond/low salary debate, but I feel the discussion so far has been raised some very worthwhile issues and is worth continuing.
STS, it was more than two years back I was laid off from my last flying job, the only thing that would make my application attractive to Eastern is the fact I do have turboprop (although not much) time on something alot heavier than a jetstream. I did revalidate my instructors rating 6 months after losing my tp FO job, but have yet to find any part time instructing work to keep the flying CV active. The pay cut I took to go full time instructing in the space of 12 months was easily the same value as an eaglejet pay to fly scheme.
Also you are correct it is easier to find a job when in a job in that field; in 2007 after a season of full time instructing I did get invited to 6 interviews/assessments, misfortunately 3 of those came just as I was about to start employment at a turboprop operator and already signed up to a large bond. Two of those were for jet operators as well, both of which were offering bonding agreements; very frustrating though there is no guarentees that I would have got the other jobs. I suppose the gamble is if you took a job at Eastern and do then get offered a jet job else where, after a year or two on that low salary are you in a position to pay yourself out of the bond/loan agreement.
Alpha Adrian, has hit the nail on the head, it does depend on your personal circumstances, after losing my turboprop job I walked back into well paid aerospace contract engineering work, (it takes me aweek and a half to earn the same monthly pay as an Eastern FO), so this is probably what makes an ptf scheme more viable for me. However I fully appreaciate that not everyone has the benefit of a well paid back up career (also my own circumstances could change and the contract work could dry up). However the benefit of modular training was it allowed me to coincide an engineering career and flight training; so I should make no apologises for gaining a back up career prior to flying.
Horsebox, again agreed to spend a further 30K after training is a bit of a hit, but as my training was a few years back I have now paid off most of my flight training (infact most of my debt comes from money borrowed to support living expenses while working as a full time instructor rather than the flight training itself), again that is my own personal circumstances, doesn't apply to everyone, but there will be others out there who have come out of training with minimal or no debt.
Anyway, I haven't yet been offered an interview with Eastern yet; although my thread has referred to my own personal circumstances, I am sure there are those that are in a similar situation.
Again if I did get a call from Eastern I certainly wouldn't rule it out, but it is something I would need to consider very carefully.
Again, thank you everyone for keeping the discussion constructive.
I apologise if I am drifting the thread into a more generic SSTR P2F/ Training bond/low salary debate, but I feel the discussion so far has been raised some very worthwhile issues and is worth continuing.
STS, it was more than two years back I was laid off from my last flying job, the only thing that would make my application attractive to Eastern is the fact I do have turboprop (although not much) time on something alot heavier than a jetstream. I did revalidate my instructors rating 6 months after losing my tp FO job, but have yet to find any part time instructing work to keep the flying CV active. The pay cut I took to go full time instructing in the space of 12 months was easily the same value as an eaglejet pay to fly scheme.
Also you are correct it is easier to find a job when in a job in that field; in 2007 after a season of full time instructing I did get invited to 6 interviews/assessments, misfortunately 3 of those came just as I was about to start employment at a turboprop operator and already signed up to a large bond. Two of those were for jet operators as well, both of which were offering bonding agreements; very frustrating though there is no guarentees that I would have got the other jobs. I suppose the gamble is if you took a job at Eastern and do then get offered a jet job else where, after a year or two on that low salary are you in a position to pay yourself out of the bond/loan agreement.
Alpha Adrian, has hit the nail on the head, it does depend on your personal circumstances, after losing my turboprop job I walked back into well paid aerospace contract engineering work, (it takes me aweek and a half to earn the same monthly pay as an Eastern FO), so this is probably what makes an ptf scheme more viable for me. However I fully appreaciate that not everyone has the benefit of a well paid back up career (also my own circumstances could change and the contract work could dry up). However the benefit of modular training was it allowed me to coincide an engineering career and flight training; so I should make no apologises for gaining a back up career prior to flying.
Horsebox, again agreed to spend a further 30K after training is a bit of a hit, but as my training was a few years back I have now paid off most of my flight training (infact most of my debt comes from money borrowed to support living expenses while working as a full time instructor rather than the flight training itself), again that is my own personal circumstances, doesn't apply to everyone, but there will be others out there who have come out of training with minimal or no debt.
Anyway, I haven't yet been offered an interview with Eastern yet; although my thread has referred to my own personal circumstances, I am sure there are those that are in a similar situation.
Again if I did get a call from Eastern I certainly wouldn't rule it out, but it is something I would need to consider very carefully.
Again, thank you everyone for keeping the discussion constructive.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sadly I think Eastern is no place for anyone bar the desperate alphaadrian. And certainly not if you have ever seen how a proper airline is run. I meet several of their crews in ABZ frequently and have honestly never met a happy one. Complaints range from very poor lifestyle, dreadful rostering, both long term and intermediate, poor pay and non existent benefits. Ready for a command? If you seem to be lucky enough to be one of their management pets then you can have one. With an £8K bond.
Things will get better soon, and when they do I personally think Eastern will be in trouble. A LOT of people will leave, in their droves and at a far greater rate than anyone could keep up with. For an airline so obviously undercrewed, judging by how badly rostering treat the crews, there could potentially be a lot of disruption.
Things will improve soon. We have just hired at Log. I'm not sure if they paid a rating. I'll try to find out. We are far far from being a good airline ourselves but compared to Eastern it feels like BA!
Things will get better soon, and when they do I personally think Eastern will be in trouble. A LOT of people will leave, in their droves and at a far greater rate than anyone could keep up with. For an airline so obviously undercrewed, judging by how badly rostering treat the crews, there could potentially be a lot of disruption.
Things will improve soon. We have just hired at Log. I'm not sure if they paid a rating. I'll try to find out. We are far far from being a good airline ourselves but compared to Eastern it feels like BA!