Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Redundancy Offers-Are they applicable to all?

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Redundancy Offers-Are they applicable to all?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Aug 2008, 10:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 35
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Redundancy Offers-Are they applicable to all?

Just thought I would ask this as there are some bright sparks and legal beavers around who may know the answer to the following.

I work for a airline that recently took over, not merged-took over, another airline. Many of the pilots from the taken over airline are refusing to sign a contract with the takeover airline and amongst other things are claiming TUPE. The takeover airline is now offering pilots from the taken over airline redundancy payments as a possible solution to them refusing to sign the parent company's contract and become fully tangoed (clue!).

My question is this. If the company is offering some employees redundancy albeit because they are on a different contract, would mere mortals in the parent conpany also be eligible to claim redundancy. We are all now pilots employed by one company and even if some of us are on different terms and conditions, can the company legally offer redundancy to a specific group of pilots but not to others/all?

Thanking my erstwhile colleagues in advance.
Slopwith is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 10:54
  #2 (permalink)  

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 67
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you'll find the straight answer is 'No'.

I'm in a different trade to you but have recently had a narrow escape from redundancy.
angels is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 11:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ask OPS!
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smells like not all is going well with the GB-Easy takeover?
wobble2plank is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 11:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland mainly, rather than at home.
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My (extremely small) provincial company was sold (by me) 8 years ago. The larger company taking us over were required to keep staff contracts, and I got a new one as I was the only one without a contract of employment. If they wanted to change existing staff contracts this had to be by separate negotiation, and staff could, if they wish exercise all rights under employment law as if the new employer was the original one. Length of employment was seamless and continuous and cumulative.

Things may have changed but I suspect not.
mikehammer is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 12:02
  #5 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You also need to establish the legal meaning of 'redundant'.

If you offered yourself up as redundant now would that mean that the company don't need you any more, you are superfluous? Would the new arrivals be better qualified than you and be able to slot into a vacancy that you are not currently qualified for?

This doesn't mean that the company can't choose to decide they are better off without you and then offer you an attractive severance package, note 'severance' and not 'redundancy'.
parabellum is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 12:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check out

Business transfers and takeovers (TUPE) : Directgov - Employment
Air Mail is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 14:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 'voluntary severence' package being offered is about half that offered by quality companies like M&S. It's 'take the new contract' or 'we don't promise anything about the future' like promotion, base change and so on.

So, in short the new employer is not interested in maintaining /honouring contracts as required under law because it 'doesn't fit in with their business model'. The model is, in year one, to pay all staff and contract companies slightly less the going rate, charge passengers slightly less than the competition and fill the planes. In year two you tell staff and contractors that times are hard and that you can only keep the contract if you accept less than last year etc. Bonuses are then paid to top managers. No guarantee for the shareholders who after ten years haven't seen a single dividend. But buying competitors (as opposed to just being better and winning passengers while expanding) and changing staff contracts is apparently part of the business model.
Obviously anybody who wants to challenge this is welcome to go to court. Employees will need deep pockets to counter the expensive barristers employed by the company.
fiftyfour is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2008, 15:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slopwith,

Speak to your union (assuming you're a member). They will have access to specialist legal advice and no doubt have been speaking to many others in your shoes.

N14HK
N14HK is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.