Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

What are BMI really like to work for?

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

What are BMI really like to work for?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2001, 22:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question What are BMI really like to work for?

Guys/girls this may be the wrong site but would be grateful for info on BMI with view to a career-currently on the 400 with an Aian carrier with 5000 hours.Thanks in anticipaion
jumbojon is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2001, 02:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

bmi have the same problems as many other airlines. If you want massive roster disruption, unstable lifestyle and poor leadership then don't hesitate, join up now.
flappless is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2001, 02:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of EU
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Flappless,

Which bmi are you in?! I disagree with some of your statements but overall I'm happy as a pig in sh*t.

Worked for an airline that is a lot worse!

JumboJon, on the 737 fleet I'm not doing a lot of work, plenty time off, pays good (but allowances need an overhall) and great people to work with.

Even binned my BA application form

[ 28 July 2001: Message edited by: Scottie ]
Scottie is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2001, 02:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Scottie,

You are right of course, a great company to work for. I guess that's why some are leaving to BA and that place in Saudi. Even had some recently off the long haul fleet - must be a GREAT airline to work for. You assume too much - the aviation business is a small one - I might not work for the same bmi.

Rgds

flappless
flappless is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2001, 12:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

flappless,

People will go to BA because it's BA, irrespective of conditions at bmi. The Roster disruption is nowhere near as bad as you make out, and the lifestyle can be stabilised by judicious use of Block Windows.

Apart from the perennial whingers (not pointing a finger anywhere, of course) there's a pretty good bunch of people to work with, reasonable money and good route variety if you're on the right fleet (the one from Seattle, that is!).
Chalky is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2001, 14:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of EU
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I side with chalky on this one.

Is there any benefit to going from bmi to BA? None that I can see.

After having looked at the pension (not much better than ours) the money only gets good when you go long haul. Very impersonal way of life. Type frozen for 4 years, pay frozen for the same length of time. Nah flappless, you're welcome to BA

And if BA is the paradise you imply then why are BA pilots leaving for other companies abroad??

I digress......

Roster stability is good, we get what 5 weeks notice last time? Last summer was bad and that issue still hasn't been addressed but things at the moment are pretty good.

People leave but it's not necessarily for the reasons you state. Various people have handed in there notice and have rescinded at the last moment.

I still state I'm as happy as a pig in sh*t working for bmi Things aren't perfect but I never expect them to be.

[ 30 July 2001: Message edited by: Scottie ]
Scottie is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2001, 14:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: All around the World
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Scottie!!!!.........get back to work!
Ray D'Avecta is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2001, 15:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Here on the 146 it depenends on where you are based. Man get bored with Man-Muc only.
Bhx are messed about with airport standby and no strcuture at all to working life. Stn do most work and get most time away. New fleet manager isn't getting on with the troops in Ham. Pay now below standard FDP crap. Pilots need BALPA to get in with ABZ!
alterego is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2001, 15:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of EU
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Ok Alterego, with respect that's a seperate thread as we're two different companies, bmi & bmi regional! I am assuming you work for regional?

Ray, why are you not at work then eh?!

[ 30 July 2001: Message edited by: Scottie ]

[ 30 July 2001: Message edited by: Scottie ]
Scottie is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2001, 01:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Chalky

Quote
The Roster disruption is nowhere near as bad as you make out, and the lifestyle can be stabilised by judicious use of Block Windows.

Unquote

Surely lifestyle is de-stabilised for those who do not 'block window' by those who abuse it. It is a sad state of affairs when your roster is considered to be stabilised by de-stabilising others ! Even if it is 'judicious' use ! Your roster should be stabilised by the company - not by you.
flappless is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2001, 13:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I know there's no such thing as a typical roster but approx. how many nights away in a month with BMI mainline. I've heard there are quite a few duties involving up to four nights away in a row...is this the case?
Blended-winglets is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2001, 22:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Blended-winglets ,

It depends. You are allowed to express a preference for more or less nightstops, and this preference is supposed to be taken into account when your roster is written.

Flappless will say it doesn't work, but it does for me, broadly speaking. As a "min nightstopper" I get maybe one a week. Other people opt for "max 3" or "max 4" which indicates they want to be away for 3 or 4 nights in a row.

Chalky
Chalky is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2001, 00:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

CHALKY
Thanks for the info. Are the requirements still 1500 hrs tt and ATPL?
Blended-winglets is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2001, 14:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

B-W,

Are the requirements still 1500 hrs tt and ATPL?
People have been taken on with less than 1500 hrs, ex-Oxford, but it probably depends on how desperate they are at any point in time (no disrespect intended to Oxford Graduates!).
Chalky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.