Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Ipa or Balpa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jul 2005, 14:20
  #21 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So an anonymous contributor alludes to BALPA 'not supporting the guys' but refuses to elaborate and does not even mention the company.

OK,you have convinced me I shall resign from BALPA.
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 16:46
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: HON121º/14 NM
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I left BALPA because I thought they could not provide value for money. The CC reps gave up the job in our company because they had so little support from BALPA against a company that rode rough shod over the supposed agreement between the union and themselves. Not only that, but BALPA did nothing to notify the members, and we had no CC for 6 months.

More generally, I can not believe that they have let the industry get away with being allowed to make pilots pay for type-ratings with absolutely no comment what so ever. At the very least it could have been allowed to support the industry through the lean periods, but now that companies are really having to work at recruitment (ie demand out strips supply), it sstill goes on, and has become common practice in all but a handful of airlines.

If you want a union with a pilot bias, try the IPF: if not, TGWU. Save yourself a bomb every year.
Firestorm is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 22:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uk
Age: 59
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitely IPA/IPF for me.

I have been made redundant in the past and BALPA just didn't come up with the goods - all be it a long time ago.

In my current airline the CC try their hardest but in my opinion are not supported enough by BALPA. The CC should not be expected to negotiate directly with the Company - they should be there to take the votes and pass on the info. to BALPA who should then do the negotiating.

The more that join the IPF the closer we will get to having a real alternative.
puddle-jumper2 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2005, 07:09
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of EU
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've just resigned from the IPA as they've increased the subscription to £11. I've been a member for 6 or 7 years (joined at the same time as BALPA) and in that time they were great for keeping an ear to the ground and getting employment information.

They had a flagging out campaign a while back but that sums up 6 years of membership. They try hard but have no "clout" whatsoever. I saw £11 as unneccessary expenditure seeing as I'm in a BALPA recognised company.

BALPA subs work out about £19 after tax relief and for that I get an awful lot more. I also pay through BALPA Financial Services for a Loss of Licence policy which they offer.

Nothing is perfect but some are more perfect than others
Scottie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.