Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

PMA Parts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Aug 2001, 15:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question PMA Parts

Recently heard conversations down in engineering about PMA parts and the companies decision not to use them, has anyone heard why our illustrious leaders in the many companies we work for will not use these parts, surely if they are approved there should not be a problem.
C.130 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2001, 20:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Quality is the main reason that some people will not use PMA parts , as you say they are aproved but some do not last as long as OM parts so in the long run SOME are not a good economic move.

How ever some PMA parts are very good and offer a real cost saving only close observation by the engineers will tell you what is good an what is not.
A and C is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2001, 21:32
  #3 (permalink)  
dv8
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Location Location
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

PMA?
Is that engineer speak for 'bought them at B&Q'
dv8 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2001, 21:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Antonio,Texas,USA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

"Perfectly Manufactured Alternative" that just happens to have been bought at a Bar-B-Q.
Dragonspet is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2001, 01:46
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Post

There's a good deal more involved in such decisions, chaps. Best left to tech department PEs to consider.

Some of the main concerns relate to the degree of support and tech backup which the PMA organisation can, or cannot, provide and the technical knowledge or lack thereof, which went into the "original" work done by the organisation.

Keep in mind that the OEM invests a LOT of effort into design and manufacture - not all PMA organisations have the resources to do that.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2001, 15:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Worth noting that a large number of parts are manufactured under PMA anyway. Presumably the FAA wouldn't approve them if they were "dodgy"???
CCAero is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2001, 15:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

******, CCAERO beat me to it, anyway, if you chaps take the time to carefully check the parts being fitted to your aircraft you will note that most of them are PMA's, in fact if you ever get the chance to look over a brand new aircraft straight out of the factory, you will notice that approx 50% of the parts fitted are PMA's.

This whole PMA issue is a falicy, the management tell us to save money, so we look at PMA's, which can save us a huge amount of hard cash, only to be told that we cannot use them, and then get chewed out for spending too much.

When will managment realise the vast sums of money they are wasting could be saved if only they pulled their heads out of the sand and allowed us poor grease monkies to do our jobs properly.

For you info, just removed and airframe mfr supplied part from my B777,, and guess what it has PMA written on it - go figure!!!!

MFFA938 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2001, 18:54
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Post

I think that we might be missing a few points here.

There is nothing the matter with a manufacturer using PMA parts as they still are subject to review by the production QA system. Indeed, there is no reason why a manufacturer cannot hold PMA tickets anyway. The in service problems mainly come down to one of general support.

It is not simply a policy matter of .. we should .. or should not use PMA sourced items. The sensible airline supply organisation will seek appropropriate technical guidance as to which parts are appropriate to seek supply alternative to the OEM.

[ 05 September 2001: Message edited by: john_tullamarine ]
john_tullamarine is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.