Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Classic B747 - Electrical relationship between Ignition & Engine anti-ice!

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Classic B747 - Electrical relationship between Ignition & Engine anti-ice!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Mar 2002, 13:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Classic B747 - Electrical relationship between Ignition & Engine anti-ice!

Why, when we have a 'no light-off' with one of the two ignition systems during ground start, and the FE then uses the other ignition to light it off, does he then check that the engine anti-ice still works on that same engine, as per the MEL?. .Just curious,. .Cheers
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2002, 13:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sydney,NSW, Australia
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Because the assumption must be made that one ignition system is inop.. . Why don't you just ask the instructor?
olivasnooze is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2002, 23:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN,USA.
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sorry having a brain fart. Whats the correlation between one ignition being inop and the need to go back and retest the engine anti-ice system.
tinyrice is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2002, 06:52
  #4 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

To be sure that the engine doesn't go quiet in icing conditions and need an in-flight re-start. With a less than perfect ignition system. Or something like that. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> . .. .Was it really wise getting rid of all those Flight Engineers? . .. .**********************************. .Through difficulties to the cinema
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2002, 08:27
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks Blacksheep, but as far as I am aware, only one ignition is required when anti-ice is switched on, and only remains on for a short while, if their is only little turbulence.. .. .I sort of thought that there must be some sort of electrical commonality in the operation of the two systems, and the a/i check just proves that the problem is with the igniter plug giving up, rather than the common control system.. .Sounds reasonable, but can't find anything in writing, and the groundies can't tell me.. .I got this info from an FE, that's why it sounds reasonable!. .Any more ideas?
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2002, 14:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Post

The MEL requires a check of the NAC TAI on an engine with 1 ign inop. There can only be 1 ign inop on the a/c as I recall it.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2002, 14:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Ignition systems installed 8. .required 4 (one per engine) <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2002, 15:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Interesting, other than the Saab A340 I don't recall anybody flaming out an engine due to ice ingestion from anti-iced surfaces.
Al Weaver is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2002, 06:45
  #9 (permalink)  
QAVION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

"but as far as I am aware, only one ignition is required when anti-ice is switched on, and only. .remains on for a short while, if there is only little turbulence.". .. .G'day, FD. .Are you referring to the sort of Anti-ice system which fires up the ignitors automatically for about 60 seconds to prevent a flameout due to Anti-Ice melted ice (i.e. ice which may have formed previously in your engine inlet)? . .. .Perhaps Blacksheep is more concerned about preventative or long term use of the Anti-Ice System, i.e. to stop the ice build up in the first place and keep the engines ice free. I believe that ice, if left to accumulate in an engine intake over a long period in the absence of anti-ice may snuff out the engine irrespective of whether the ice was melting or not (due to disrupted airflow in the inlet).. .. .In your situation, if the engine should flame out, due to the build up of ice or the melting of ice, you only have half the capacity to relight the engine. If there is no ice build up in the first place (say because you predicted that there would be ice ahead and switched on the Anti-Ice system beforehand manually), the engine would be less likely to flame out under icing conditions (and you wouldn't need to restart the engine with a single ignitor).. .. .Hope this makes sense.. .. .Rgds.. .Q.
 
Old 28th Mar 2002, 07:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Post

Spanners,. .I don't think that's how it is on the classic.. .In QF we had it drilled into us 1 inop ign only.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2002, 07:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

mustafagander Just checked 3 mel's for RR, GE and Pratt all say 8 installed 4 required, all for classic, it is slightly different for the 747-400 where you can still have 4 inop but must have ignition 1 on at least 2 engines.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2002, 09:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Ta Spanners,
Live and learn I guess. :o
mustafagander is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 04:22
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Hi all,
We seem to have gotten off the original track just a bit!
In a Classic, with one ignition on one engine inop, (if both were inop, we woundn't be able to start the engine), we are required to test that the same engines' anti-ice system still remains serviceable - my question is why that is so, since there is seamingly no direct relationship.

Thankfully, the Classic is fully manual, and as such, only does what you tell it to do, when you tell it to do it!!

Yes, we do always use two ignitions for t/o and landing, and one ignition, (the working one, hopefully!), when we initially select nacelle anti-ice in crz, and if the ride remains smooth, that ignition is turned off.

My original question still stands, anybody know?
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2002, 02:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN,USA.
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this a JT9D powered Classic, or one of those "bastardized" versions? If its a JT9D, the only connection that comes to mind would be to ensure that either start switch electrical system, and thus its associated ignition, doesn't have some fault that prevents the pylon valve or high stage valve from functioning correctly. The Nac A/I valve is electrically actuated, air operated. Potentially then, the Nac A/i valve might not get sufficient flow and temp air for de-ice / anti-ice for Take-off if either valve's stuck somewhere they shouldn't be. When you dexterously advance the throttles,the high stage closes and the core engine provides all the air. That said,the high-stage and pylon valve lights should clue you to these failure modes. It's weak but it's all I got..............
tinyrice is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2002, 09:18
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks 'Tinyrice',
I'm sure I don't know what you mean by those "barstardised ones', this is also required on the RR powered aircraft, incl the C2 and D4 series, as well as the PW ones, that's the -7 series, incl. the 7R4G2 engines, can't remember offhand if it's the same for the GE CF6-50 and -80 engines, havn't seen one for awhile!

We always use the 'packs off' technique for t/o, and as such, the pylon valves are cycling, with nothing really to supply, until the first pack is selected at around 300', and as for the high stage valves, those lights should be out before power is stabilized, prior to advancing power for t/o!

Many thanks, but I'll keep looking.
Cheers.
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2002, 12:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Must be a procedure left over from the ice age.

Definitely you aren't going to unlight an engine on a B747 from ice coming from the inlet whether anti-ice is working or not.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2002, 13:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sydney,NSW, Australia
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
waddayamean?
olivasnooze is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2002, 19:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arabian Gulf
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Not sure if we're on the right track at all here...but here goes.
On some types of aircraft (Modern Boeings for sure) there are TWO ignition selectors (two igniters per engine).
Depending on the 'selected' position, and what systems use it, an 'inop' igniter (subtle or obvious) 'selected' will obviously be of no use.
We have procedures, albeit not the Classic 747, to select 'BOTH' AFTER engines started. We select one igniter (left) for east-bound flights and the other (two, right) for west-bound flights during pre-flight for engine start.
Should the engine fail to start due igniter failure, all is obvious.
Should the igniter fail after engine start, and if it is NOT in BOTH position, then crew WILL be unaware of the failure until the next time the engine is started with that igniter selected (unless there is a failure detection system - no EICAS mesage on our type of aircraft).
Anti-ice uses the 'selected' igniter on MOST aircraft.
If you select BOTH after engine start, the likelihood of both having failed without pilot knowledge, is remote (has happened), however, the remaining igniter WILL be available for Anti-ice usaeage.
Now, on the classic (of which I know nothing! - sadly born in a different generation), MAYBE the Anti-ice check served the same outcome.
A look into the systems of igniter (selected) VS. anti-ice might help understand the 'type' situation.
Hope this is helpful.
Here's to ice-free engines!

Last edited by safety_worker; 8th Apr 2002 at 19:35.
safety_worker is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 21:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: South Africa
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, according to the CB panels (P6), there is no link up between the eclectrics of these two items, this is on GE-E's and JTD's, interesting observation this...needs a bright spark
Jetlagged is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.