Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737-800 TAI vs climb performance


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737-800 TAI vs climb performance

Old 20th September 2024 | 09:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Paris
737-800 TAI vs climb performance

Hi,
Would anybody be aware of any en route climb performance penalties when engine and/ or wing anti-ice are used ?
It doesn’t seem to appear in the flight planning and performance manual tables.
John_McYul is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 09:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 100
From: IRS NAV ONLY
You could apply the same fuel burn penalties as for cruise (+45kg/h for engine anti-ice). Wing anti-ice is unlikely to be used for any prolong period of time during climb in the 737.
FlyingStone is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 10:12
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Paris
Hi, thanks for your answer.
I was rather referring to climb gradients penalties, not fuel burns. In the en route climb performance tables you find distances to reach altitudes, but no mention of anti ice use cases.
I don’t know either if FMS corrects its altitude computations iaw TAI use.
John_McYul is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.