Boeing's Recommended Brake Cooling Schedule
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Auh
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boeing's Recommended Brake Cooling Schedule
The schedules have Inflight Gear Down Cooling. I've always thought that this part was solely for after-takeoff gear cooling. However, the FCTM states:
which lead to the confusion.
The only example I can find in the book suggesting early gear extension is for overweight landings. Perhaps this practice should be considered during hot days and high elevation as well? Nonetheless, if the Brake Cooling Schedule is indeed applicable in this scenario, I'm still perplexed as to how I'm expected to determine the million foot-pounds (the brake energy absorbed) before landing, in order to calculate the required cooling time.
I've contemplated whether Vref could serve as a reference point, but I'm hesitant to proceed without solid confirmation/reference.
Extending the gear a few minutes early in the approach normally provides sufficient cooling for a landing. Total in-flight cooling time can be determined from the PI chapter of the QRH which lead to the confusion.
The only example I can find in the book suggesting early gear extension is for overweight landings. Perhaps this practice should be considered during hot days and high elevation as well? Nonetheless, if the Brake Cooling Schedule is indeed applicable in this scenario, I'm still perplexed as to how I'm expected to determine the million foot-pounds (the brake energy absorbed) before landing, in order to calculate the required cooling time.
I've contemplated whether Vref could serve as a reference point, but I'm hesitant to proceed without solid confirmation/reference.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Auh
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fursty Ferret True, but this doesn't answer my question.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle KBFI
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Landed MEX and had very warm brakes that did not fully cool, but were at 2 and below, so OK for take-off. Did normal gear retraction for climb, etc. Short leg over to GDL so extended the gear early on the approach to let it cool down some more prior to another heavy weight ldg.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fursty Ferret True, but this doesn't answer my question.
Brake cooling schedule is a calculation for turnarounds, to give an indication of the minimum turnaround time - or leave the gear down for takeoff (performance penalty). On days with multiple sectors and short turnarounds, the overall temperature can still slowly rise as there isn't really time to let the brakes cool down. As the day progresses, every time you do a turnaround, the risk of running into a "minimum turnaround time" (or takeoff performance penalty due to gear down requirement) is bigger and bigger. Think hot 4/5 sector day with very short flights, extended taxi time, high payloads,....
In order to provide extra cooling to the brakes, Boeing proposes to lower the gear earlier on the sectors. The advantage is that your starting point in the brake cooling schedule calculation will be lower, hence less chance to end up with a turnaround time requirement (or gear down required after takeoff) after sector 3/4/....
In order to provide extra cooling to the brakes, Boeing proposes to lower the gear earlier on the sectors. The advantage is that your starting point in the brake cooling schedule calculation will be lower, hence less chance to end up with a turnaround time requirement (or gear down required after takeoff) after sector 3/4/....
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Auh
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brake cooling schedule is a calculation for turnarounds, to give an indication of the minimum turnaround time - or leave the gear down for takeoff (performance penalty). On days with multiple sectors and short turnarounds, the overall temperature can still slowly rise as there isn't really time to let the brakes cool down. As the day progresses, every time you do a turnaround, the risk of running into a "minimum turnaround time" (or takeoff performance penalty due to gear down requirement) is bigger and bigger. Think hot 4/5 sector day with very short flights, extended taxi time, high payloads,....
In order to provide extra cooling to the brakes, Boeing proposes to lower the gear earlier on the sectors. The advantage is that your starting point in the brake cooling schedule calculation will be lower, hence less chance to end up with a turnaround time requirement (or gear down required after takeoff) after sector 3/4/....
In order to provide extra cooling to the brakes, Boeing proposes to lower the gear earlier on the sectors. The advantage is that your starting point in the brake cooling schedule calculation will be lower, hence less chance to end up with a turnaround time requirement (or gear down required after takeoff) after sector 3/4/....
1) I understood that extending the landing gear early in approach contribute to brake cooling, but from what I understood from your reply is that we can’t determine the required time the gear needs to be extended during the approach from the schedules. Hence the schedule is not usable in this case. Correct?
2) During an RTO when recognize the rejected speed so we can obtain the brake cooling time from the schedule, I have read somewhere that if we couldn’t identify the RTO speed we can use V1. My question is how to determine the braking speed _after landing_ so we can see the minimum turnaround time (to cool the brake). Do we use Vref?
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You either go into the tables with Vref, which will give a correction for altitude / temperature, or use the ground speed at touchdown directly on the sea level and 15C line.
Thanks for the response! However I still have 2 questions:
1) I understood that extending the landing gear early in approach contribute to brake cooling, but from what I understood from your reply is that we can’t determine the required time the gear needs to be extended during the approach from the schedules. Hence the schedule is not usable in this case. Correct?
1) I understood that extending the landing gear early in approach contribute to brake cooling, but from what I understood from your reply is that we can’t determine the required time the gear needs to be extended during the approach from the schedules. Hence the schedule is not usable in this case. Correct?
The brake cooling schedule on the other hand is _advisory_ to prevent problems (it does however refer to the quick turnaround limit for safety reasons to make sure you check it). The brake cooling schedule itself does not really "stop" you from doing anything, and if you would compare brake cooling schedule tables in QRH and different AFM's, you might find them to give different results.
There are too many variables involved. The biggest one from my experience is actually taxi time and the use of the brakes during taxi. My experience is the awareness is a lot bigger on widebody fleets, much less on narrowbody fleets. As mentioned before, you might taxi out and notice hotter than expected brakes prior to takeoff. It is up to you as a pilot to decide on how to handle the issue; leave the gear down if able on takeoff, however you are not "required" to do so. If however you would end up with a warning after takeoff, there is a note to put the gear back down for an certain amount of time. If nothing happens, you continue on but in order to create some safety when running the "advisory" brake cooling tables shows you might heat the brakes too much on landing and taxi, you might decide to put the gear down early on the approach. It is all about awareness.
2) During an RTO when recognize the rejected speed so we can obtain the brake cooling time from the schedule, I have read somewhere that if we couldn’t identify the RTO speed we can use V1. My question is how to determine the braking speed _after landing_ so we can see the minimum turnaround time (to cool the brake). Do we use Vref?
Hope this helps, and always comments welcome to correct...
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Below the tropopause
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My company uses a generic minimum turnaround (waiting) time IF you detemined you have landed at a weight above your OPT Quick turnaround weight on your OPT Landing Dispatch page. We do not have brake temp monitors /scales hence we have a time and weight SOP. How you use the nbrs after RTO is a bit vague and as they are all 'advisory' it is recommended to assume worst case scenario of V1, add 10 minutes after stopping to decide what to do wrtmove or not after stopping due to het build up and then apply good airmanship when it. omes to using the tables. The 'in-flight' cooling is useless without the monitor/scales as you have no way of telling.