Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Minimum Climb Gradient

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Minimum Climb Gradient

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Dec 2023, 08:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Oxford
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Minimum Climb Gradient

Hi all,

I was hoping someone on this forum could help enlighten me on a question that has crossed my mind. I've attached below an SID chart from Zurich airport on the DEGES1B departure and I noted that the published minimum climb gradient is 6.1% up to 2500 feet. The next published restriction I can see is at ZH502 which is 4000 feet or above, and roughly looking at that chart I can see that point is roughly 7 miles away from the ZH520/2500 or above restriction. Assuming we cross ZH520 at 2500 feet, I've roughly calculated that the minimum required gradient would be 3.5% to ZH502 and if I recall correctly, any gradients that are more than 3.3% must be published on the chart.

Forgive my ignorence folks, it's been a while since I've last flown and I'm trying to brush up on my theoretical knowledge so if anyone would be able to enlighten me more on this subject I'd be ever so grateful. Thank you in advance!




CessNah is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2023, 11:00
  #2 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,178
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Note 2, the SID is also a noise abatement procedure.
swh is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2023, 11:32
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Oxford
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Another example that has me scratching my head is the BPK7F out of London Heathrow which has a published gradient of 4.0% to 4000 feet for air traffic management. I can see that there is a 4000 or above restriction based off of the 304 from the LON VOR and my very vague calculation puts that point approximately 10nm from the DER. Once again having done the calculations, I'm getting a 6.6% gradient required to actually achieve that.

I know that I am probably having another brain cloud moment, but if anyone has an explanation they could offer me I would be very grateful! Thank you in advance once again!
CessNah is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2023, 12:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A given climb gradient on the chart may or may not relate to the crossing restrictions. In both cases they clearly do not
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2023, 02:21
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Oxford
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by STBYRUD
A given climb gradient on the chart may or may not relate to the crossing restrictions. In both cases they clearly do not
I'll admit, I never knew that until today, always thought they were related! Thanks for your input, I appreciate it!
CessNah is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.