Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Perf question King Air 350

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Perf question King Air 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Aug 2023, 08:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perf question King Air 350

Hello

I got a question. Got recently in touch with somebody who was considering to get a King Air 350 B300 however, the airfield is only 2624ft paved long. He was asking me if that would be realistic. Private operations so no AOC.

As i am not really familiar with King Air i tried to look up data but i have no access to a POH/AFM.

Can somebody give me a MTOW for: 2624ft paved runway, 150ft elevation, 25 C and standard atmosphere. Just to have a rough idea. My gut is saying it is a no-go and consider other airfield or other aircraft.

Thank for helping me.
Enigma01 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 15:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,016
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Hello, Enigma01! Beechcraft stipulate Takeoff Field Length (MTOW) of 3,300 ft. (1,000m). Please see: Beechcraft King Air 350 Brochure

- Ed

cavuman1 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 16:00
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi thank you. I found this as well. But i was more thinking what MTOW it can take off on a 2625 ft runway. Then we can play around with fuel or payload. To have a rough idea.

TX anyway.
Enigma01 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 16:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Miami
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Enigma01
Hello

I got a question. Got recently in touch with somebody who was considering to get a King Air 350 B300 however, the airfield is only 2624ft paved long. He was asking me if that would be realistic. Private operations so no AOC.

As i am not really familiar with King Air i tried to look up data but i have no access to a POH/AFM.

Can somebody give me a MTOW for: 2624ft paved runway, 150ft elevation, 25 C and standard atmosphere. Just to have a rough idea. My gut is saying it is a no-go and consider other airfield or other aircraft.

Thank for helping me.
my quick read of the POH is

11,500 lbs = 2637 ft runway
11,000 lbs = 2534



321XLR is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 16:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 953
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 321XLR
my quick read of the POH is

11,500 lbs = 2637 ft runway
11,000 lbs = 2534
So with a BOW of 10K#, 2 pax, about 600# of fuel? Enough for 30 minutes with 45 reserve? Sounds pretty limiting....
hans brinker is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 20:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Miami
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hans brinker
So with a BOW of 10K#, 2 pax, about 600# of fuel? Enough for 30 minutes with 45 reserve? Sounds pretty limiting....
yeah, for sure
321XLR is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 23:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,209
Received 134 Likes on 61 Posts
I would suggest a PC12 would be more suitable for that runway
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 03:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Miami
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would suggest a Caravan


321XLR is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 08:09
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tx a lot guys.

Thats what i thought as well… very limiting.
Enigma01 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 15:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Miami
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4,000 hrs in the 350. our in-house safety rule of thumb was 4500 FT strip was minimum for all ops.

yes, we know what the "book" said and what a brand-new airplane, on a perfect day, flown by a test pilot, could do.

for us, 4500 ft was the rule

321XLR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.