Question on FLS on Airbus A320 aircraft
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question on FLS on Airbus A320 aircraft
A320 Pilots, Hello!
When flying non precision RNP APP using FLS outside of temperature range published on chart, do we need to correct minimums and which minimums to use? (LPV, LNAV/VNAV or LNAV)
Or let's say even in the published range, chart says BARO-VNAV not authorized below -45°c, do we need to correct minima
Thank you
When flying non precision RNP APP using FLS outside of temperature range published on chart, do we need to correct minimums and which minimums to use? (LPV, LNAV/VNAV or LNAV)
Or let's say even in the published range, chart says BARO-VNAV not authorized below -45°c, do we need to correct minima
Thank you
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Milkway Galaxy
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assuming A 320 FLS is same as A 350 (which is very likely)
- Surely you have to make correction to DA even you fly with FLS
- Surely you have to make correction to your FAF (platform) altitude even you fly with FLS as informing ATC if you are not under ATC Radar Control
- Technically I know, there is no cold temperature limit applies if you fly with FLS provided above corrections are made, but procedurally it may be requiring, I do not remember any Regulation emphasizing this
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assuming A 320 FLS is same as A 350 (which is very likely)
- Surely you have to make correction to DA even you fly with FLS
- Surely you have to make correction to your FAF (platform) altitude even you fly with FLS as informing ATC if you are not under ATC Radar Control
- Technically I know, there is no cold temperature limit applies if you fly with FLS provided above corrections are made, but procedurally it may be requiring, I do not remember any Regulation emphasizing this
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Bratislava
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JABBARA It absolutly make sence you comment. In 737 we have to fly LNAV/VNAV whitin temperature range withou any temperature correction, but if we are outsinde limmit we have to fly LNAV with correction to IAF ,IF,FAF and DA/MDA, holding , MSA. But I have a question regarding first par of martin2304 using FLS, when on RNP chart is depicted LPV, LNAV/VNAV, LNAV minimums which one you pick up?...As far as I remember in LNA/VNAV DA is constructed for minimum possible temperature in order to avoid obstacles so in this case applying correstion is not necessary. On the other hand in charts there are notes that for high temperatures GP may much more higher comare to isa deviation GP shoving in FMS/MCDU.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Milkway Galaxy
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SamuelCV
Just brief replies
JABBARA It absolutly make sence you comment. In 737 we have to fly LNAV/VNAV whitin temperature range withou any temperature correction, but if we are outsinde limmit we have to fly LNAV with correction to IAF ,IF,FAF and DA/MDA, holding , MSA. But I have a question regarding first par of martin2304 using FLS, when on RNP chart is depicted LPV, LNAV/VNAV, LNAV minimums which one you pick up?...As far as I remember in LNA/VNAV DA is constructed for minimum possible temperature in order to avoid obstacles so in this case applying correstion is not necessary. On the other hand in charts there are notes that for high temperatures GP may much more higher co
- All answers are available to your questions in DOC 8168 Volume I Flight Procedures(PAN-OPS), at the moment I can not give you reference page by page, but if you cannot find yourself I can do it later
- FLS is not an approach procedure but is a technique trademarked by Airbus
- PAN-OPS says regardless your technique you have to apply Cold Temperature corrections (this is intuitively logical as well as I tried to explain in my previous post)
- PAN-OPS says For aircraft with approved automated cold temperature compensation FMS systems, the promulgated
minimum temperature can be disregarded provided the actual temperature is within the limits of the aircraft
certification. - LNAV/VNAV min is a Baro-VNAV kind approach minimum, Whereas LPV isbanyo giderini sökmek completely different and it is not a Baro-VNAV approach and approach path is not effected from temperature (similar to ILS) but still needs barometric correction at minimums . To be able to use LPV minimum, GNSS on board, should have SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation System) capability. By SBAS, approach path is calculated and flown as 3D GNSS position, so no need barometric path
Last edited by JABBARA; 15th May 2023 at 19:11. Reason: "precious" is edited as "previous"
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Bratislava
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Simply said ,I kow that LPV is SBAS in which "VNAV" GP is corrected by GPS, but FLS is as well compensated and did the same job in final approach segment using avionc correction of GP. If in DOC 8168 is clearly statet which minimums in this case I must use I will check it. Thanks for your effort JABBARA
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Madrid
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To my knowledge, you still have to select LNAV/VNAV minima, as the LPV is a different kind of approach, for which you need to have certain equipment(in this case, SBAS) and certain certifications/authorizations from the regulator that the A320. Even if the A320 onboard navigations systems are as precise as those in LPV approved aircraft, you're still legally restricted to LNAV/VNAV. Maybe in the future Airbus incorporates this requirements and thus A320s will be able to perfomr LPV approaches.