Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Interesting A320 flare technique

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Interesting A320 flare technique

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Oct 2022, 06:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting A320 flare technique

What are your thoughts on this flare technique? I assume he has to bump Vapp by quite a bit to make it work.



Check Airman is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 08:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 can be landed closing thrust but at 100ft or even before is suitable for slat and flap jammed at zero. Good old technique start flare and close thrust works in all aircraft and most conditions. A little before or after not an issue.
vilas is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 08:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is a large white area under the message from Check Airman. Should there be a video link there?
washoutt is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 12:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Doha
Age: 13
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Imagine if he flared high and CM2 needed to take control and wanted to do a go around.
Black Pudding is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 12:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: England
Posts: 436
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Airbus thought it was a great technique to close the TL at 100ft, I imagine they would write it in the FCOM. You just better hope you dont hit a downdraft with engines at idle.
Capt Scribble is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 14:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GC Paradise
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Wow...Good luck with that technique!
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 17:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Paris
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A friend of mine took a sim screening for a Chinese company a couple of years ago and failed because the A/THR OFF ECAM popped about 5 ft before touchdown (which sometimes happens even with a by-the-book flare). Apparently not the same company 😅
John_McYul is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2022, 06:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW1A 2AA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing wrong with that. He should be congratulated. Good technique and great for saving fuel. Should promote him to Head of Training.
Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2022, 05:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Bonvoy Marriott
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don’t know what is more idiotic. This landing technique or showing it off on YT.
SaulGoodman is online now  
Old 13th Oct 2022, 07:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Neither here or there
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Classic young Chinese spunky captains showing they're better than anyone else.
CW247 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 15:01
  #11 (permalink)  
I want a Blue User Title
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Winterthur
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of curiosity an examiner of mine did this in tail-wind conditions as a demonstration, cut the power around 50FT. However on Airbus Safety First they recommend cut power "later" for tail-wind conditions, so which one is it?!
k.swiss is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 17:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by k.swiss
Out of curiosity an examiner of mine did this in tail-wind conditions as a demonstration, cut the power around 50FT. However on Airbus Safety First they recommend cut power "later" for tail-wind conditions, so which one is it?!
For tailwind FCTM recommends early flare i.e. before 30ft. not cut power early. Thrust can reduced at normal 20ft, a little early or late as required.
vilas is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2022, 06:13
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks all. I thought it looked a bit premature. The earliest I've seed somebody go to idle in "normal" conditions was 50ft. It got my attention, but I'd rather not try it. 100ft seems like you're asking for trouble.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2022, 11:09
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,551
Received 51 Likes on 19 Posts
Classic set-up for a tail strike if you ask me.
chimbu warrior is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.