Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Cessna General Aviation Wing Struts

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Cessna General Aviation Wing Struts

Old 2nd Oct 2022, 22:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cessna General Aviation Wing Struts

(Some comments deleted - JT)

I was wondering about Cessna's General Aviation airplanes and the use of the strut that attaches the wing to the fuselage. Some Cessnas like the CE172 use the strut while other similar models like the CE177 and CE210 do not. Does anyone know why some airframes have the strut while others do not?


aviationluver is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2022, 23:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: cowtown
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 172 wing with strut has more flex than the 177 without strut . That flex can be hazardous to the windscreen if someone has pumped too much silicone into the gap . Usually a small sealing bead is in front of felt to give a nice seal . If the felt was removed and just pure sealant used . A dangerous condition can occur .Recovering from a spin in just such a siliconed mess , I lost half the windscreen . I couldn’t get the aircraft to stop phugoid oscillations when slowing down , but still had some pitch control above 90 knots . So that was the first time I had landed a 172 at 90 knots . Fully expecting to go off the end into the fence , but the drag from the missing top of the window slowed the plane down and I got it stopped before the end of the runway . Good times
Never spun a Cardinal .
fitliker is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2022, 03:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's basically an engineering dance to acheive certain goals for the aircraft (including marketing )

But clearly either will work, since low-wing aircraft of the same general type (e.g. Piper PA-28 variants) very rarely use struts.

For the most part, Cessna deleted the strut in the 177 Cardinal (and probably 210) to:

- improve pilot sight-lines (no blind spot from the struts), also cleaning up the view for using the aircraft for aerial photography
- reduce drag, although that was more important in combination with retractable landing gear. Thereby improving fuel efficiency, range, or speed (at least in theory).
- iremove struts' obstruction to boarding or loading
- "look more futuristic" than the aging C172, which had been on the market for 15 years. Wing struts were something of a hold-over from the bi-plane era - looked a bit "old-fashioned" by 1970.

Cessna did, of course, have to make the 177's internal wing spar stronger/stiffer/heavier, to compensate for the loss of the struts' added reinforcement.

In any case, the C172 is still made today, while the strutless Cessna prop planes have vanished from the marketplace. "The market" apparently seems to have had no problem with the strut.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2022, 07:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 611
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Struts are even considered by NASA and Boeing for the next generation of airliner wings. They might need extreme span (folding on the ground) for efficiency.
https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/t...el-consumption

Last edited by Less Hair; 3rd Oct 2022 at 08:14.
Less Hair is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2022 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.