Emergency equipment requirements under EASA
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: international
Emergency equipment requirements under EASA
Hello
I need so help locating an EASA document that specifies the minimum emergency equipment a particular aeroplane is suppose to have ( I guess it is based on seat number and aircraft arrangement) .
Any help appreciated
I need so help locating an EASA document that specifies the minimum emergency equipment a particular aeroplane is suppose to have ( I guess it is based on seat number and aircraft arrangement) .
Any help appreciated
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 2
From: RH base 36R
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 180
From: USA
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 112
Likes: 3
From: At home
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 180
From: USA
CMIIAW, but I would think EASA only approves MMELs for aircraft certificated in EASA land. Pretty sure the MMEL for "my" N-reg citation wasn't touched by EASA. But if I wanted to fly there, I would probably have to comply with EASA emergency equipment regulations.
Only half a speed-brake
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
It's a good question whether FAA approved the MMEL for your N- registered Airbus, and how different it is from the EASA shelf edition.
My best guess is YES + marginally if at all.
Hard to go much further without any context behind the OP's question, the references provided so far should be sufficient.
For CAT large airplanes, EASA CS-25, the section SAFETY EQUIPEMENT starts at CS.25.1411
My best guess is YES + marginally if at all.
Hard to go much further without any context behind the OP's question, the references provided so far should be sufficient.
For CAT large airplanes, EASA CS-25, the section SAFETY EQUIPEMENT starts at CS.25.1411
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: international
Thank you for all the answers . The MMEL was one place I looked before posting . There are section in which the number installed was with a “-“ symbol , meaning “as required by regulation” thus not very clear .
