Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

General EFIS and A320-specific questions

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

General EFIS and A320-specific questions

Old 5th Oct 2020, 14:28
  #41 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,880
Originally Posted by FlightDetent View Post
If the vertical profile guidance before FAF/P was not such crap, perhaps people would be inclined to using the DES mode without intervening all the time?

But it is not.
I hear even the 787 guys arenít impressed with the VNAV. Thatís a good thing right? It means our jobs are still safe. Right?
Check Airman is online now  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 05:38
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Check Airman View Post
Thanks guys. My airline has an odd sop where we change altitudes by putting the new altitude into the FCU, and pointing to the FCU. The last operator had us point to the PFD, which made more sense.

I’m told that this is the newest, best way of doing things, so I guess I’ll point to the FCU
We have the same procedure. it's actually an AIRBUS, ICAO and IATA recommended procedure. The aim is to confirm the selected altitude before engaging the climb/ descend mode to prevent altitude burst. If anyone interested I can Email the Airbus document.

Edit: Found the one from Airbus online: https://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/194.pdf
pineteam is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 07:18
  #43 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting home
Age: 42
Posts: 3,024
I am quite convinced that when saying "altitude window" in the FOBN, Airbus is just copying the regulatory guidance verbatim.

What they mean, and define in the generic SOP of FCOM, is to set the value silently and then verbalise the readout from FMA - in their particular installation.

FlightDetent is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 07:55
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 71
The procedure is pretty clear in our SOP; It's really pointing to the FCU first. it might look ridiculous at first but it's actually not that bad. I guess this procedure is more adequate for operators flying daily into China when you get a lot of step climbs and step descents in meters where we need to do the conversion all the time in feet. Altitude burst is a serious event in that part of the world.
pineteam is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 09:59
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Age: 43
Posts: 159
Airbus recommends to select the FCU altitude to the next constraint altitude during climb

Quote from FCOM system related procedure / climb / monitoring the climb phase :

RECOMMENDATION:To ensure that you will not miss the next constraint, it is recommended to select the FCU altitude to the next constraint as described above.

Citation2 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.