Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A380 could be saved?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A380 could be saved?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Apr 2020, 23:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Someday I will find a place to stop
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 6 Posts
A380 could be saved?

Hi, just putting an idea out there for discussion.
The A380 with having so many seats in it, with the advent of Covid19, if that flew with vacant seats for distancing, how do the economics work out vs say a 777-300ER with seats not occupied for the same reason?
Could it work out that its more profitable to use the A380 on that basis.
I'm finding a burn of A380 12-13000kgs/hr 525 seats vs CX 777-300ER 8100kgs/hr 365 seats
However I don't know the proper comparison required, is it cost per seat per mile? and would have to work out the vacant seats for each to work out what could be occupied.
DeltaT is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 06:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,818
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
A more relevant question would be: if airlines load factors are to be reduced by a factor of two (or even three) to provide social distancing on board, can any airline afford to operate any of its aircraft ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 09:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
The A380 could be saved by an increasing demand for freight traffic.

The aircraft was designed to be a freighter as a new build aircraft (A380-800F), thus it would not be surprising that designs for retro modification of passenger aircraft are readily available.

Modification of a slightly older generation aircraft could be easier that cutting into more recent 'plastic' aircraft.

Also the double deck 380 could have advantages in multiple side loading doors and possibly for nose lift, although the latter might not be required or viable.
safetypee is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 10:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
I think both Fedex and UPS looked seriously at the A380 and decided that the loading infrastructure required for the upper deck was not viable compared to existing fleets. Internal lifts were considered but the loading time was too long.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 12:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,840
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
A more relevant question would be: if airlines load factors are to be reduced by a factor of two (or even three) to provide social distancing on board, can any airline afford to operate any of its aircraft ?
Guess what might have to change by a factor of two (or even three) in order to make this happen?
FullWings is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 20:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,408
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by safetypee
The A380 could be saved by an increasing demand for freight traffic.

The aircraft was designed to be a freighter as a new build aircraft (A380-800F), thus it would not be surprising that designs for retro modification of passenger aircraft are readily available.

Modification of a slightly older generation aircraft could be easier that cutting into more recent 'plastic' aircraft.

Also the double deck 380 could have advantages in multiple side loading doors and possibly for nose lift, although the latter might not be required or viable.
Safetypee, the A380 simply does not pencil out as an effective freighter. Aside from the difficulties of loading freight on the upper deck (which would require massive strengthening to carry a meaningful load), it's MZFW is far too low. Yes, it can carry the cargo a long way without needing to refuel but it can't carry much and the world air cargo market isn't built that way - it's based around max leg lengths of about 4,000 miles. Cargo operators would rather carry more cargo and make a gas stop than go non-stop over long distances. As it is, the A380 is limited to about 85 tons cargo, while the 777F can carry well over 100 tons and the 747-8F pushes 150 tons. Further, the location of the flightdeck makes a nose cargo door a non-starter.
Presumable, the A380F would have addressed the MZFW issue, but retrofitting built aircraft to increase the MZFW by 50 tons or more is simply not practical.
tdracer is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 22:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
What Tdracer said... Airbus was told, they chose not to make it convertible to cargo ops....but they were warned!
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 22:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
And this is how Emirates made a killing with their 380 fleet..

More seriously I know for fact that some people are doing serious number crunching on that topic. No idea if it will actually turn into something viable.
​​​
atakacs is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 03:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 161
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
DeltaT,

I think a more relevant question might be: Of the A380 fleet that was in service prior to the Covid crisis and now currently grounded, how many will ever fly again in revenue service.
Commander Taco is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.