HF radio check on the ground
prickly
Some people’s area of operations means that they just can’t comprehend having to make a taxi call on HF in an airliner at an untowered airport 1000+ miles from anywhere.
Some people’s area of operations means that they just can’t comprehend having to make a taxi call on HF in an airliner at an untowered airport 1000+ miles from anywhere.
Last edited by compressor stall; 31st Mar 2020 at 10:20.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Taxiway Y1
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WTF? do I assume you would suggest there is no point checking the mags before take off because they may not be serviceable later?
I would suggest if you are operating around the Central Pacific, no HF, no go. So a pre take off HF check is essential. SELCAL however is a luxury.
I would suggest if you are operating around the Central Pacific, no HF, no go. So a pre take off HF check is essential. SELCAL however is a luxury.
WOW. Strong reaction. So in your case you find out one of your mags doesn’t work and you press on regardless? How many flights did you cancel/delay for unsatisfactory HF/SELCAL check on ground? There are many airports around the world where reaching someone while on the ground and shielded by terminals and mountains with HF is difficult.
Fly safe!
WOW. Strong reaction. So in your case you find out one of your mags doesn’t work and you press on regardless? How many flights did you cancel/delay for unsatisfactory HF/SELCAL check on ground? There are many airports around the world where reaching someone while on the ground and shielded by terminals and mountains with HF is difficult.
Fly safe!
Fly safe!
We are not allowed to use our cellphones at petrol stations, and they are much lower power devices.
HF ground testing has probably been safety audited, but just a thought: The distance from your aircraft fin, (where the HF antenna usually is), to your fuel tank vents is not much different to those of the aircraft next door, on some ramps.
HF ground testing has probably been safety audited, but just a thought: The distance from your aircraft fin, (where the HF antenna usually is), to your fuel tank vents is not much different to those of the aircraft next door, on some ramps.
However, there was a recorded case of a Ham radio operator causing an explosion at a petrol (gas) station in Southwestern Ontario way back in the 60's. I remember reading about it in the press, so it is not an apocryphal story. Ham mobile rigs are typically 100-200 Watts, similar to aircraft HF. And then your ADSB is 150 Watts at 1090 MHz, much more energy than HF. So I would say that anywhere you can set mode S you can safely use HF.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We are not allowed to use our cellphones at petrol stations, and they are much lower power devices.
HF ground testing has probably been safety audited, but just a thought: The distance from your aircraft fin, (where the HF antenna usually is), to your fuel tank vents is not much different to those of the aircraft next door, on some ramps.
HF ground testing has probably been safety audited, but just a thought: The distance from your aircraft fin, (where the HF antenna usually is), to your fuel tank vents is not much different to those of the aircraft next door, on some ramps.
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The HF test refueling restriction is a leftover from the probe and wire days. HF transmissions won’t cause an explosion any more than a cell phone will at a gas station. People should be taught more to ground themselves before fueling a car than worry about a cell phone.
If HF transmissions were a danger, you’d find more information on it. You don’t.
Yes, Airbus restricts you from doing it, but I’d say it’s more out of a liability concern. If you ask anyone there, and I have, you’ll find o one has an an answer.
If HF transmissions were a danger, you’d find more information on it. You don’t.
Yes, Airbus restricts you from doing it, but I’d say it’s more out of a liability concern. If you ask anyone there, and I have, you’ll find o one has an an answer.
SkyGod
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
1 Post
This has more to do with getting people to focus on the task at hand, refueling safely, and then crossing the forecourt to pay without getting run down, than it has to do with ignition sources.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The voltages present on a HF antenna can be rather large its caused by the black magic in the antenna tuning unit. The number insulators and size on a ground based antenna should give you a clue however for the same power the induced voltages on VHF and above are much smaller but the energy of the electron will be greater ( Lenz and Planck)
If no one can come into accidental contact with the antenna or aircraft( grounding issues) then i'd say your fine to test if your not sure leave it alone until you're away from everyone. I've known ship radio officers come up on the ham bands to test their kit
.
If no one can come into accidental contact with the antenna or aircraft( grounding issues) then i'd say your fine to test if your not sure leave it alone until you're away from everyone. I've known ship radio officers come up on the ham bands to test their kit
.
Aircraft refuelling during other aircraft's HF operation on the ramp has presumably - hopefully - been safety audited.
The HF transmission from your own aircraft is less likely to cause problems to your own aircraft because there is a conductive electrical path between your own HF system and your aircraft structure to equalise any electrical charges.
The problem can arise when two conducting bodies are not electrically joined - potential differences or static charges can arise. This is why your fuelling tanker connects an 'earth' wire to your aircraft before connecting the fuel hose: it forces both aircraft and tanker to the same electrical potential so there is no potential difference between the two, which could otherwise cause sparks and possible ignition when the fuel hose is connected and disconnected.
Two aircraft side by side on the ramp are not electrically connected to each other, and they have insulating rubber tyres, so a potential difference could arise - for example by one aircraft using a high power RF transmitter. As I say, hopefully, this has been considered - I always understood that HF and RADAR etc should not be used on the ramp, i.e. in close proximity to other aircraft.
The HF transmission from your own aircraft is less likely to cause problems to your own aircraft because there is a conductive electrical path between your own HF system and your aircraft structure to equalise any electrical charges.
The problem can arise when two conducting bodies are not electrically joined - potential differences or static charges can arise. This is why your fuelling tanker connects an 'earth' wire to your aircraft before connecting the fuel hose: it forces both aircraft and tanker to the same electrical potential so there is no potential difference between the two, which could otherwise cause sparks and possible ignition when the fuel hose is connected and disconnected.
Two aircraft side by side on the ramp are not electrically connected to each other, and they have insulating rubber tyres, so a potential difference could arise - for example by one aircraft using a high power RF transmitter. As I say, hopefully, this has been considered - I always understood that HF and RADAR etc should not be used on the ramp, i.e. in close proximity to other aircraft.
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good morning everyone
I haven't used HF radioes in a while, our SOP require a check of HF reception, transmission and Selcal check on the ground before departure, it look like that Stockholm Radio has disappeared from my route manual, does anyone know of any other FREE service provider in northern europe?
Thank you
I haven't used HF radioes in a while, our SOP require a check of HF reception, transmission and Selcal check on the ground before departure, it look like that Stockholm Radio has disappeared from my route manual, does anyone know of any other FREE service provider in northern europe?
Thank you
The HF frequencies are on the enroute charts, pick one based on the old “higher the sun, the higher the freq “, rule. Always works, just include the frequency you’re using to call for the check.
In my airline the HF check on ground (with dual HF and satcoms) is considered complete if you hear the tuning tone after a quick transmit on the frequency. No prolonged voice transmission required.
If the transceiver tunes, it’s considered functional due to the way the units work. This has been the same across the various Boeing and Airbus fleets.
If the transceiver tunes, it’s considered functional due to the way the units work. This has been the same across the various Boeing and Airbus fleets.
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason mobile phones use is not allowed on petrol forecourts is actually nothing to do with the RF signal which as you say is low power and poses no risk. The main potential hazard is if someone were to drop the phone while filling up their vehicle it could break and the battery could cause a spark, petrol vapour is heavier than air so if there is any accumulation of vapour it will be close to the ground just where any spark from a dropped device might occur.
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just noticed this old post.....
Whilst twiddling the knobs at Speedbird London, I often had test calls from the A/C HF "Boxes", by technicians checking the equipment, after maintenance or repair.
These calls were often transmitted from inside a hangar or the apron out front.
There was never a concern raised, that I heard of, about a possible fire hazard, plus, Kerosene is much less volatile than Petrol.
Although the A/C were on the ground and often physically underneath the station, (3rd Floor Tech Block "A") the received signal was often very weak and difficult to hear because
the transmitting and receiving aerials were, latterly, remotely located near Guildford and Farnborough!
Speedbird London R.I.P.
Whilst twiddling the knobs at Speedbird London, I often had test calls from the A/C HF "Boxes", by technicians checking the equipment, after maintenance or repair.
These calls were often transmitted from inside a hangar or the apron out front.
There was never a concern raised, that I heard of, about a possible fire hazard, plus, Kerosene is much less volatile than Petrol.
Although the A/C were on the ground and often physically underneath the station, (3rd Floor Tech Block "A") the received signal was often very weak and difficult to hear because
the transmitting and receiving aerials were, latterly, remotely located near Guildford and Farnborough!
Speedbird London R.I.P.
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts