Is autopilot or FD necessary for PBN RNP APCH (LNAV)
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Vilnius
Is autopilot or FD necessary for PBN RNP APCH (LNAV)
Hi,
Looking for information regarding PBN. Have to figure-out is autopilot or flight-director is necessary on board to get operational approval for RNP APCH (LNAV). In AMC 20-27 You can find some not very clear statements, from which can be understood, that AFCS is necessary. Thanks in advance!
Looking for information regarding PBN. Have to figure-out is autopilot or flight-director is necessary on board to get operational approval for RNP APCH (LNAV). In AMC 20-27 You can find some not very clear statements, from which can be understood, that AFCS is necessary. Thanks in advance!
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Austria
To be specific for RNP Approach or Rnav(GNSS) in which RNP not less than 0.3 NM with LNAV Minimar
Auto Pilot is NOT required, however FD is required to be followed
REF1: A330 / A320 FCOM-> Procedures->Special Operations -> 51 Performance Based Navigation (PBN) -> RNP APCH/RNAV (GNSS) 30 NOV 2019
REF2 :ICAO DOC9997 Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) Operational Approval Manual 2018 -> Chapter 4 Nav Spec & DOC 9613 AN/937
EASA CS-ACNS ACM 20-27
FAA AC90-105
SOP -> Procedure -> DES Prep & Approach using FINAL APP
Auto Pilot is NOT required, however FD is required to be followed

REF1: A330 / A320 FCOM-> Procedures->Special Operations -> 51 Performance Based Navigation (PBN) -> RNP APCH/RNAV (GNSS) 30 NOV 2019
REF2 :ICAO DOC9997 Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) Operational Approval Manual 2018 -> Chapter 4 Nav Spec & DOC 9613 AN/937
EASA CS-ACNS ACM 20-27
FAA AC90-105
SOP -> Procedure -> DES Prep & Approach using FINAL APP
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,562
Likes: 33
From: I wouldn't know.
Well, how is it in FLS (airbus) or IAN (Boeing)? Different indication which is completely ILS alike in looks and behaviour. Considering that we can easily fly GLS/ILS approaches to CAT I limits and with a HUD in some cases to CAT III limits, why would we not be able fly an RNP approach to a lower limit if the indication system supports that?

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 240
Likes: 8
From: B.F.E.
Well, how is it in FLS (airbus) or IAN (Boeing)? Different indication which is completely ILS alike in looks and behaviour. Considering that we can easily fly GLS/ILS approaches to CAT I limits and with a HUD in some cases to CAT III limits, why would we not be able fly an RNP approach to a lower limit if the indication system supports that?
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: USVI
A characteristic of the FLS is that it can only be used for straight-in approaches. It is not compatible with curved RNP-AR approaches.
For curved approaches, crews need to undertake specific training and checking, and use the FINAL APP (or APP-DES on A350 aircraft) mode.
Airbus is working towards co-existence of the two modes so that all non-ILS/MLS approaches are flown in FLS and the FINAL APP mode remains available for RNP-AR.
For curved approaches, crews need to undertake specific training and checking, and use the FINAL APP (or APP-DES on A350 aircraft) mode.
Airbus is working towards co-existence of the two modes so that all non-ILS/MLS approaches are flown in FLS and the FINAL APP mode remains available for RNP-AR.

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 540
Likes: 336
From: Blue sky






