Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

EASA FTL and ULR flights

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

EASA FTL and ULR flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Nov 2019, 14:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA FTL and ULR flights

Hi guys,

As far as I understand, the absolute maximum Flight Duty Time under EASA regs is 18 hours, allowing for a maximum block time of 16.5 hours with no room to spare in case of any operational disruptions.

This is less than certain Asian, Middle-eastern, or American operators fly at the moment and the newest generation airplanes are just becoming capable of flying Europe-Austraila non-stop (which Qantas already does, sucessfuly).

Such an operation seems impossible at the moment under EASA regs, while everyone else seems to be doing it happily for several years already. Does anyone know if EASA has (or is working on) any provisions for ULR flights?

Cheers,

SnR
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2019, 17:03
  #2 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I sure do not know, how did you arrive to the -1,5 ?
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2019, 17:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Briefing time?
Check Airman is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2019, 17:48
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where I fly, on longhaul flights, the FDP starts 1.5 hrs before scheduled departure and ends at chocks in - hence the maximum flight time of 16.5, maybe 17 if the operator has different provisions.

Thats not not enough to do a proper ULR flight, like eg. LHR-PER.

From what I’ve seen, other jurisdictions have special provisions for ULR flights, on case by case basis - i.e. certain max FDP is granted for a particular route, taking into account individual arrangements, such as departure time, rest periods, crew requirements etc. Is there anything similar in EASA?
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 01:20
  #5 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ok. I was wondering of there was 30 minutes past chocks on. The home airline abandoned 1,5 LH briefs about 10 years ago. All of this briefing / reporting time is a bit shady, it depends how honest is the operator with the crew-room to A/C part of the equation. Some FDP-critical missions would only have 45 min briefing time allocated but that is quite far from your question.

Meanwhile, I found this: a starting point?

ARO.OPS.235 Approval of individual flight time specification schemes

(a) The competent authority shall approve flight time specification schemes proposed by CAT
operators if the operator demonstrates compliance with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 and Subpart
FTL of Annex III to this Regulation.

(b) Whenever a flight time specification scheme proposed by an operator deviates from the
applicable certification specifications issued by the Agency, the competent authority shall apply
the procedure described in Article 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.

(c) Whenever a flight time specification scheme proposed by an operator derogates from applicable
implementing rules, the competent authority shall apply the procedure described in Article 14(6)
of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.

(d) Approved deviations or derogations shall be subject, after being applied, to an assessment to
determine whether such deviations or derogations should be confirmed or amended. The
competent authority and the Agency shall conduct an independent assessment based on
information provided by the operator. The assessment shall be proportionate, transparent and
based on scientific principles and knowledge.
GM1 ARO.OPS.235(b);(c) Approval of individual flight time specification schemes

ICAO DOC 9966 (MANUAL FOR THE OVERSIGHT OF FATIGUE MANAGEMENT APPROACHES)

Further guidance on fatigue risk management processes, appropriate fatigue management, the
underlying scientific principles and operational knowledge may be found in ICAO Doc 9966 (Manual for
the Oversight of Fatigue Management Approaches).
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 06:19
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Flight Detent , that’s probably what I was looking for. Couldn’t find it in FTL part, didn’t expect it was buried somewhere deep in ARO part.

As for your question - where I fly now, FDP ends at chocks in, while Duty Period ends at C/I+30’ - but there are no daily limits for DP.

I’ve seen different arrangements at different operators, regarding both pre flight and post flight. 1h30’ Reporting for a longhaul flight sounds about right for me, but it depends on individual arrangements of the operator.

The simplest way I’ve seen was to report at the gate, with papers delivered to the cockpit, no crew room at all.
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 07:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 411
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
When I operated ULR flights the ULR rules applied to flight duty periods. These were fairly complicated and involved such things as having routes approved on city pairs basis, crews established in departure time zones for at least two local nights before flight (IIRC) and departure times strictly controlled to two four hours windows in each 24 hours period to avoid arriving at destination during a double circadian low. Crew rest patterns during the flight were also very controlled and had to be recorded. At that time the maximum duty period was flight time plus three hours. Initially we thought the rest patterns were crazy but it quickly became apparent that they were rather good and I for one always arrived much better rested than when I operated normal long-haul flight where rest was usually split half and half.
Fly3 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 10:06
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NZ
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the middle East ULR operate on an FTL variation from the chapter 7 OMA. I assume if an operator wanted to fly a ULR from Europe then they would apply for the same.
cockygashandlazy is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 14:38
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Gents, that’s interesting stuff.

Fly3 - out of curiosity, could you elaborate on the rest patterns? I would be interested as to how they look.

Cheers,
SnR
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2019, 04:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 411
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The rules at that time stated that each crew (double crew carried) must rest twice and one rest period must be at least four hours. For example on a 19 hour flight the command crew would return to their seats one hour before landing. They would have rested the previous 5 hours while the relief crew worked. They would work the 5 hours before that while the relief crew was resting. The command crew would have flown from take off but the time from top of climb to the start of the first 5 hour rest period was divided in two and shared. This usually meant the command crew working for approximately the first 4 hours of the flight, resting about 4 hours, working 5 hours, resting 5 hours and working the final 1 hour. Although it sounds a strange way of doing things I found it excellent as we always arrived feeling relatively fresh and ready for the room party.
Fly3 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2019, 07:27
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Fly3 . That actually makes sense. I found out I can’t sleep in the bunk for more than 4-5 hours in one stretch, anyway. I’m pretty sure I’d prefer it this way, than simply dividing the rest by half.
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.