Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Radius of turn rule of thumb

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Radius of turn rule of thumb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2019, 22:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Amantido
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radius of turn rule of thumb

Not really sure this is the correct place, but what was the quick rule of thumb to quickly get a rough estimate of radius of turn?
Miles per minute minus 2? 240 knots would 4nm/min and minus 2 would be 2nm of radius?

Banana Joe is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2019, 23:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
What bank angle? What G?

Concorde used about 35nm radius to do a 180 at Mach 2.02 (1165 kts). Bank of 30° 1.15 g. Tha's just about exactly twice what your rule predicts. Rule = 19.5 nm/minute - 2 = 17.5nm, actual = 35 nm.

Anothe source says 20° bank, 1.06g, 52nm radius turn.

The Blue Angels (F-18 Hornets) had a dual maneuver I saw once. One plane in carrier-landing-config (flaps, gear, hook), the other clean at ~ 610 kts (700 mph). The fast plane would pass the slow one at the middle of the showline, and both would roll into 360-turns timed to return to the crowd at the same moment. "Slow and dirty" used about 0.4-mile radius (less than width of the Mississippi at that point), fast plane flew 3-mile+ radius way out over Arkansas. No idea what angle and G they used.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2019, 23:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,671
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Google ; csgnetwork.com/aircraft turn performance........
sycamore is online now  
Old 27th Jul 2019, 23:50
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Amantido
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am just looking for a simple rule of thumb to use in the terminal area for a medium sized airliner (A320, 737, etc.) and that would make it easy to calculate when to turn into a DME arc and lead radial to turn off it.
Banana Joe is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 01:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: US
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See the below. I am not allowed to post the actual link at this point, delete the space before htm.
code7700.com/rot_turn_radius. htm
FalconFan is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 03:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Banana Joe
I am just looking for a simple rule of thumb to use in the terminal area for a medium sized airliner (A320, 737, etc.) and that would make it easy to calculate when to turn into a DME arc and lead radial to turn off it.

On the 727 we used to use 1% of our groundspeed added to the DME arc distance
as a lead in to start the turn to join it
stilton is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 05:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old thread here

Radius of turn Formula
industry insider is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 07:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or this thread too—> Formula for Radius of Turn
pineteam is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 08:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
One of the simplest rules-of-thumb that I've seen (assumes limiting bank angle of 25°) is to square the groundspeed (in nm/min) and then divide the result by 9, to give radius in nm.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 09:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello DaveReidUK,

Do you mind to give an example? Not sure I understood your rule of thumb.
Thanks.

Edit: Ohhhh I think I got it: so 240kt = 4nm/min =4^2= 16/9 =1.8nm?

Last edited by pineteam; 28th Jul 2019 at 09:03. Reason: Sentence added
pineteam is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 09:14
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Yes, that's it.

You had me worried for a moment - I teach maths as a sideline, so I ought to be able to explain things clearly.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 09:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hahaha sorry my bad, I did not have enough sleep last night; Took me a while to undestand it. xD
Great tips by the way!
pineteam is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 13:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
I find the navigation formula of "About yea" does the trick most of the time."
Centaurus is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 13:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Frisco, Texas USA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1% of groundspeed, in still air, SRT.

Or, Mach number minus 2, still air SRT.
HalinTexas is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 17:29
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Broughton, UK
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Using the original formula.... At 120kts = 2nm / m minus 2 is 0nm radius... Even less at lower speeds.

So best rule of thumb... Radius is 2nm.
.
scifi is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 20:10
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Amantido
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Mach number -2 or nm/min-2 would work for speeds higher than 180 knots since we are limited to a bank angle of 25°.

I thought the other rule of thumb was TAS or GS divided by 200? 1% of GS is the diameter, isn't it?
Banana Joe is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 20:43
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be clear:

TAS 140kts - Diameter 1.4nm
TAS 180kts - Diameter 1.8nm
TAS 210kts - Diameter 2.1nm

mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 20:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: France
Age: 69
Posts: 1,143
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Radius of turn for a NAT turnback:

Boeing MCP Bank limit Auto means about 15 AOB in HDG SEL:
TAS 500kts, still air, r = 15nm.

Bank limit set to 25 AOB:
TAS 500kts, still air, r = 7.5nm (which is quite handy as that means you will end up 15nm off track on the reciprocal.)

Same exercise with 100kt crosswind, doubles or halves the radius depending on direction of turn downwind or upwind.

So, to stay within 15nm, use 25 AOB and/or turn into the crosswind if you can.
eckhard is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 22:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by mcdhu
To be clear:

TAS 140kts - Diameter 1.4nm
TAS 180kts - Diameter 1.8nm
TAS 210kts - Diameter 2.1nm

mcdhu
Subject to assumptions about turn rate and bank angle, of course.

DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2019, 13:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Broughton, UK
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Just wondering if the OPs original formula should have had a divide by 2 sign, instead of a minus 2 sign...?
Still gives about the same answer...
.
scifi is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.