Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Radius of turn rule of thumb

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Radius of turn rule of thumb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Aug 2019, 14:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Isla Grande
Posts: 997
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scifi
Just wondering if the OPs original formula should have had a divide by 2 sign, instead of a minus 2 sign...?
Still gives about the same answer...
.
Yep, but only with 240kt.
gearlever is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2019, 19:36
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Amantido
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scifi
Just wondering if the OPs original formula should have had a divide by 2 sign, instead of a minus 2 sign...?
Still gives about the same answer...
.
You subtrsct two. This works for Mach Number but I was wondering if it would work also for airspeed higher than 180 kts.
Banana Joe is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2019, 16:56
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: US
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Circumference of a circle = 2Πr.

r = (Half Circumference) / Π.

Rate 1 turn... 360° turn takes 2 minutes... 180° takes 1 minute. so...

Ground speed in NM/Min. 180 kts --> 3NM/min.

So in 1 minute you cover 3 NM and in this example that's half the circumference. So if you assume Π ≈ 3, your radius become ≈ 1 NM.

Ground speed in NM/Min. 120 kts --> 2NM/min.

So in 1 minute you cover 2 NM and in this example that's half the circumference. So if you assume Π ≈ 3, your radius become ≈ .66 NM.

Ground speed in NM/Min. 210 kts --> 3.5NM/min.

So in 1 minute you cover 3.5 NM and in this example that's half the circumference. So if you assume Π ≈ 3, your radius become ≈ 1.15 NM.
KingAir1978 is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2019, 17:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: KPMD
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the since rescinded US Air Force AFMAN 11-217, Volume 3, page 65:

Turn Radius Calculation. The following two relationships provide the distance required to turn an aircraft 90° using 30° of bank. This distance is the aircraft’s approximate turn radius. These formulas are particularly useful when determining lead turn points when planning to perform a radial-to-arc or arc-to-radial portion of an instrument procedure

Formula 1: Turn radius [in nm] = (True Airspeed [in knots] / 60) - 2 or (Mach × 10) – 2
Formula 2: Turn radius [in nm] R = (True airspeed [in knots] ÷ 60)^2 / 10 or Mach^2 × 10

If you are flying in against a ground-fixed reference (e.g. DME arc, VOR radial, FMS Track-to-fix or course-to-fix leg), use ground speed in lieu of true airspeed

Last edited by Le Flaneur; 3rd Aug 2019 at 17:24. Reason: Correction to formulas
Le Flaneur is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2019, 17:30
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by Le Flaneur
Formula 1: Turn radius [in nm] = (True Airspeed [in knots] ÷ 60) - 2 or (True airspeed in nm/minute × 10) – 2
Formula 2: Turn radius [in nm] R = (True airspeed [in knots] ÷ 60)^2 ÷ 10 or (True airspeed in nm/minute)^2 × 10
Those formulae don't make sense.

In each case, the bit before the "or" is OK, but the part after should use True Mach, not TAS nm/min.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2019, 17:25
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: KPMD
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Those formulae don't make sense.

In each case, the bit before the "or" is OK, but the part after should use True Mach, not TAS nm/min.
Post corrected, thanks for pointing out the error

Last edited by Le Flaneur; 3rd Aug 2019 at 17:45.
Le Flaneur is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2019, 20:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 962
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
One of the simplest rules-of-thumb that I've seen (assumes limiting bank angle of 25°) is to square the groundspeed (in nm/min) and then divide the result by 9, to give radius in nm.
For your info - This is described in the link posted (in a non-link form) above

Turn Radius

with a full proof.

Also suggests dividing by 10 as it's clearly easier and "in most cases is close enough".

To get a better approximation of dividing by 9 you could divide by 10 and add 10%.

So - taking the example of 25

25 / 9 = 2.78
25 / 10 = 2.5
2.5 + 10% = 2.75

To see the difference between 1/9 and the new approximation

1/9 = 0.111111

Dividing by 10 and adding 10% can be expressed as
0.1 * 1.1 = 0.11 which is very close to 0.11111. It's about 1% different.





jimjim1 is online now  
Old 3rd Aug 2019, 20:58
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by jimjim1
Dividing by 10 and adding 10% can be expressed as
0.1 * 1.1 = 0.11 which is very close to 0.11111. It's about 1% different.
Close enough for government work.
DaveReidUK is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.