Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 high engine vibration with smell of burning.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 high engine vibration with smell of burning.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Apr 2018, 10:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 798
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
A320 high engine vibration with smell of burning.

Hello all,

A high engine vibration on the A320 directs you to the QRH procedure. This clearly states that an ECAM vibration advisory alone does not require an engine shut down.

I had this situation in the sim a while back so didn't shut the engine down but then not long after instructor calls to say there is a smell of burning and small amount of smoke. So I decided this was more than a coincidence with the ECAM advisory so shut the engine down and all debrief points afterwards that this was the correct decision.

I flew with a colleague not long ago and he had the same situation but instead of shutting the engine down he ran the Smoke/fumes removal kept the engine running at idle. This he did because of the section in the high vibration QRH saying 'high engine vibration may be accompanied by cockpit and cabin smoke and/or the smell of burning. This may be due only to compressor blade tip contact with associated abradable seals'. Does this phrase imply its exceptable to keep the engine running whilst having smoke/burning? I would still be very uncomfortable running an engine that's producing a burning let alone smoke even if you were removing the smoke with the smoke removal QRH.

Any my thoughts or ideas would be great.

Mooneyboy
Mooneyboy is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2018, 11:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would still be very uncomfortable running an engine that's producing a burning let alone smoke even if you were removing the smoke with the smoke removal QRH.
If you switched off the associated pack, then the smoke can't enter the aircraft.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2018, 13:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This may be due only to compressor blade tip contact with associated abradable seal
This should only be temporary (secs) in nature while at power assuming EGT is within limits when returned to idle.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2018, 15:21
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 798
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks for your pointers.

Golden rivett: Yes you have a good point that turning the pack off is a quick easy way ( as long as X bleed isn't open) to stop more smoke/smell entering the cabin. However if it was smoke that had already entered the cabin and causing pax breathing difficulties then you may still want to remove it.

Lomapaseo: Please correct me if I'm wrong but are you saying that as the compressor blade tip makes contact with the abradable seal as the seal is worn down ( as it should do in this situation) it could produce a temporary burning smell/smoke. Once it's worn down, which shouldn't take long there is enough blade tip clearence now that there is no more burning smell/smoke produced so if all other parameters are correct it can be run at idle and therefore not require an inflight shutdown?
Mooneyboy is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2018, 15:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lomapaseo: Please correct me if I'm wrong but are you saying that as the compressor blade tip makes contact with the abradable seal as the seal is worn down ( as it should do in this situation) it could produce a temporary burning smell/smoke. Once it's worn down, which shouldn't take long there is enough blade tip clearence now that there is no more burning smell/smoke produced so if all other parameters are correct it can be run at idle and therefore not require an inflight shutdown?
Yes "could"
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 1st May 2018, 02:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine vibration by itself may not call for engine shutdown but if you notice perceptible smoke the smoke procedure will have to be applied and since it all started with engine vibration you would be applying air conditioning smoke suspected which will lead to shutting down of the faulty pack. After that the decision whether to shutdown the engine can be taken according to the vibration procedure.
vilas is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.