Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Deleting hard heights

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Deleting hard heights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Apr 2018, 09:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deleting hard heights

Hi

Can anyone tell me if there is any regulatory information that demands that information on the CDU must reflect the SID?

ie Your first stop altitude is 4,000 feet hard altitude, and ATC clear you to 4,000 feet. Why not then delete the 4,000 feet hard altitude? Not an SOP or flying manual question, but a regulatory question. Is it written down somewhere by EASA CAA FAA etc

Thanks in advance
tonker is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 10:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question. Why would you? How does it improve the situation? It will reduce situational awareness in a critical phase. Regulatory? I doubt it.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 60 north
Age: 59
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delete away.

We almost never fly the Stars and Sid as published. A lot of direct to....
Why would Naa mikromanage such a thing??
Read what ICAO recommends , if anything.
As your question is SID specific I would only be concerned about MSA , airspace restricted altitudes etc.
On Stars I personalty delete altitude restrictions I know are not used to do CDA.
Plenty of places , RAT this gives you a higher and safer situational awareness. ( on Stars, Approaches)
PO
Your SOP should cover this. ?
BluSdUp is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tonker
Hi

Can anyone tell me if there is any regulatory information that demands that information on the CDU must reflect the SID?


Yes it does, You can find more info Here
sonicbum is online now  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hundred Acre Wood
Posts: 264
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you fly an Airbus, leaving things as they are will give you a magenta reminder on the ND (if you have constraints selected).
Doug E Style is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAT this gives you a higher and safer situational awareness.

If you mean deleting an FMC hard altitude "gives you............." you'll have to explain that. Or am I misunderstanding what you've written?
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The coded hard altitude in the FMC database is one of the safety layers keeping you away from a level bust on departure. Can't think of any good reason why you would want it gone.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys in PBN OPS You are not allowed to start changing and modifying stuff at your own convenience, there's loads of literature regarding that. Your FMC database is checked and approved by your operator following a specific protocol and it is not supposed to be modified every single sector.

edit* : unless you are specifically instructed to cancel speed and altitude restrictions from ATC.
sonicbum is online now  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 60 north
Age: 59
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAT 5
Thanks, I made no sense there,
Example , ILSz rwy 13 AGP the box has 5000 twice within a short distance. If deleting the first this will give ca 5800 and you are then on a higher profile. Safer!?

Not relevant I suppose as we are talking SID.
BluSdUp is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BluSdUp
Example , ILSz rwy 13 AGP the box has 5000 twice within a short distance. If deleting the first this will give ca 5800 and you are then on a higher profile. Safer!?
What if there is a crossing track with minimum altitude of 6000' ?
poldek77 is online now  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 11:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 60 north
Age: 59
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is not. You are cleared for the ILS at that point. The GS is at 5800 but has small ups and downs as there is hills reflecting the GS slightly.
But, Yes do not apply this anywhere!
BluSdUp is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 13:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Blu.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 13:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
edit* : unless you are specifically instructed to cancel speed and altitude restrictions from ATC.
Edited again: Or flying in somewhere like the UK or Japan when ATC clearance to higher automatically cancels the restriction.....unless re-stated.

Yes, I too wish they could come up with one version auto cancel or not auto cancel, I really don't care which one but just pick one and stop the individual differences
Pontius is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2018, 20:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tonker
Can anyone tell me if there is any regulatory information that demands that information on the CDU must reflect the SID?

ie Your first stop altitude is 4,000 feet hard altitude, and ATC clear you to 4,000 feet. Why not then delete the 4,000 feet hard altitude? Not an SOP or flying manual question, but a regulatory question. Is it written down somewhere by EASA CAA FAA etc
First, there is no regulation requiring a CDU. you can fly a VOR/DME-based SID using raw VOR and DME data if you like.

HOWEVER, if you are flying an RNAV SID, with authorization to do so in an OpSpec or LoA, you must follow the applicable regulations for the level of RNAV you are using. For example, if flying an RNAV1 or RNAV2 SID, you must use an autopilot or flight director. Either of those would be difficult to use without the correct information in the CDU. OTOH, you MIGHT be able to use the MCP in place of CDU altitude constraints, but why would you?
Intruder is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2018, 02:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kopavogur
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC clearance cancels out SID altitude restrictions in most countries .
Icelanta is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2018, 02:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you fly a RNAV SID/STAR. You can clear the altitude constraints or speed restrictions if ATC tells you no altitude/speed restrictions. The only thing you are not allowed to do in the FMS is to add manually a waypoint.

“Manual entry of SID/STAR waypoints is not permitted.”
From our SOPM.
pineteam is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2018, 13:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TPE Flyer
FCOM is very clear, that clearing the SPD CST from the MCDU in NOT the recommneded procedure.
Are You aware of the fact that there are other aircrafts around the world other than Airbus and different company SOPs ?
sonicbum is online now  
Old 27th Apr 2018, 19:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TPE Flyer
FCOM is very clear, that clearing the SPD CST from the MCDU in NOT the recommneded procedure. Selecting the desired speed on the FCU is.
Where does it state this? Please provide a reference.
All my FCOM mentions is that if a specific speed is required, use selected. Nothing against clearing unused speed constraints, i.e. 250 below 100 if you have already accelerated. Why fly around with incorrect predictions?

Either way I would not get too worked up about it. Surely you make many more alterations to the MCDU during climb and descent, like sequencing the flight plan when on vectors. That's much trickier than a simple deletion of a speed constraint. If you can't manage that..
PENKO is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2018, 13:08
  #19 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RAT 5
Question. Why would you? How does it improve the situation? It will reduce situational awareness in a critical phase. Regulatory? I doubt it.
Unless it is specified in an aviation authority approved operations document.
aterpster is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2018, 14:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is about to turn into another SOP fist fight.

Delete them as you please, just don't bust the level off. Valid for any departure, whether out of LHR or anywhere else.

We've got no SOP in place that requires the hard altitudes in the FMC.
172_driver is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.