Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

VR and density


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

VR and density

Old 26th February 2018 | 16:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Trondheim
VR and density

I'm currently reading Aircraft Performance, written by P.J. Swatton, and I got a bit confused regarding the rotation speed (VR) and how it is affected by density altitude. My understanding is that since VR is an indicated airspeed, an aircraft should lift off at the same indicated airspeed, with both low and high density.
However, in the book it is stated that if the density is decreased, VR will increase to produce enough lift required for lift off.

This statement will be true if we are talking about TAS, but is the same true for IAS?
Marius_S is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2018 | 19:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: N5109.2W10.5
.... an aircraft should lift off at the same indicated airspeed, with both low and high density.
Correct. However when the density is lower, the acceleration rate is slower (due less thrust) so VR can be delayed so that V2 is achieved by the time the aircraft reaches attitude "X" degrees pitch.

Last edited by Goldenrivett; 26th February 2018 at 21:28. Reason: typo
Goldenrivett is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2018 | 10:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
Never came across a performance calculation that applied density altitude to V spds. How would you? Applied to RTOW and allowed thrust, yes, but the speeds used were always those associated with calculated weight.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2018 | 13:31
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Trondheim
But wouldn't V1 vary with density since it will take longer to accelerate from V1 to VR with low density? And the same for V2, a lower density means that VMC is reduced and we can therefore have an reduced V2 (provided it still is above 1.13 VSR)?

Another small question; could someone tell me which (if any) airplane have a significant reduction in the single eng power-on stall speed?
Marius_S is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2018 | 15:04
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Charts the start with an OAT and pressure altitude are essentially “ density altitude” charts, but no Part 25 perf data calls it density altitude, only Part 23.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2018 | 20:31
  #6 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
VR largely is driven by the need to hit V2 at screen, having had a failure at the critical stage of the takeoff. So, anything which might affect V2 and rotation characteristics should have an effect on VR.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2018 | 17:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
From: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Originally Posted by RAT 5
Never came across a performance calculation that applied density altitude to V spds. How would you? Applied to RTOW and allowed thrust, yes, but the speeds used were always those associated with calculated weight.
All the my charts for computing V speeds, including Vr have altitude and temperature parameters, and the computed speed is different with different altitudes and temperatures ... ergo Density Altitude is applied to the V speeds.
A Squared is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2018 | 18:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
I admit my comment was not very clear as to my meaning. Terrible, now I read it. Indeed, the tables/i-pads are entered with altitude/QNH corrections and OAT. There will be latent calculations lurking in the backgrounds to take care of density. What I meant to say is that I had not seen a calculation where we had to make an adjustment to Vspds, directly, to account for density altitude. Of course it is inherent in the outcome of whatever method is used to calculate allowed weight & thrust & speeds.

Apologies for the confusion.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.