Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Do you know which aircraft uses fly-by-light

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Do you know which aircraft uses fly-by-light

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2017, 21:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you know which aircraft uses fly-by-light


It is actually in service. I'm sure there must be several pilots current on type that can tell us what it is like to fly this aircraft.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2017, 23:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
I suspect it flies like a "normal" aircraft...

Pull back, cows get smaller, push forward, cows get bigger (apologies to the Pruner of similar name... )
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 01:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
From the user point of view, there is no difference between fly-by-light and fly-by-wire. The primary advantage for fly-by-light is that it is basically immune to EMI/Lightning effects (there may also be some small weight savings if they can get the connector thing figured out). The primary disadvantage is currently the connectors - no one has really come up with a lightweight bulletproof aviation fiber optic quick disconnect that's good for the life of an aircraft.
Fiber optics have been used on IFE systems (starting, I believe, with the original 777) but IFE is generally not considered flight critical.
Boeing did a project back around year 2000 where they installed fiber optic throttle resolvers on a 757 for in-service evaluation (it didn't actually control the engines, just fed a box out on the engines that recorded data). Throttle resolvers are a particularly attractive use since the wiring goes outside the pressure vessel and hence is exposed to the full EMI/Lighting threat - but it's also a very difficult challenge for the connectors since the on-engine connectors are frequently disturbed in a potentially dirty environment..
tdracer is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 06:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Kawasaki P-1 "Japanese Poseidon"

Given that the P-1 first flew about a year and a half before the P-8 Poseidon, shouldn't it be the other way round ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2017, 05:02
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks goodness we have tdracer replying in this thread. Thank you as usual for your informative post.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2017, 07:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
I have distant memories of Smiths Industries flying a prototype optical fibre system in a BAC 1-11 (G-ASDJ ?) as a joint research venture with BAe and RAE; late 1970s.
My memory was that the fibre link was to be, or was part of a reduced stability control system.
The aircraft was aft cg loaded, further destabilised with lead wts moved aft during flight. This aspect of the tests complemented the RAE Bedford work on reduced stability in their BAC 1-11 (XX105) which used artificial destabilisation.
PEI_3721 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.