Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Boeing 777 loses wing panel over Osaka

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Boeing 777 loses wing panel over Osaka

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th September 2017 | 21:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 578
Likes: 51
From: Schiphol
Boeing 777 loses wing panel over Osaka

A panel broke off from the wing of a AF/KLM airlines over Osaka flight to Amsterdam

A car was seriously damaged when part of a 777 wing landed on it in the Japanese city of Osaka.The panel, which weighed more than 4kg (9lb), fell from a KLM plane shortly after it departed Kansai International Airport on Saturday.It damaged the car's roof and smashed its rear window after falling more than 2,000 m. No one was injured in the incident but KLM has launched an investigation.The flight landed safely at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport later on Saturday.
The airline stated: "KLM regrets this incident and has immediately launched an investigation into the causes."
They added they were "in close contact with Japanese civil aviation authorities and Boeing".
A0283 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 00:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Johannesburg
BREAKING A piece of KLM Boeing 777-200 #KL868 fell into car shortly after takeoff from Osaka | AIRLIVE.net



judging by the color pattern, it is a portion of the fuselage, and not the wing, as reported
Romeo E.T. is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 00:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 512
From: Japan
In a different article they reported a body panel from the root/base of the right wing.
jolihokistix is online now  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 01:17
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 3
From: Oz
Not much damage. Was it even screwed on?
clark y is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 03:01
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 16
From: Australia
How can so many rivets just pop at once.
Lantern10 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 03:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
from the internet...

hence the confusion on the wing vs body...

underfire is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 07:17
  #7 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 189
From: Dorset UK
Looks like a screwed on panel to me.
Did the aircraft have some maintenance done whilst at Osaka?
dixi188 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 07:23
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 177
From: Where it is comfortable...
Looking at the condition it could just be put back on again. And some people whine that they don't make things like they used to ...

I'm sure someone who already realised there is a plastic bag full of small bolts in his pocket is now pretty embarrassed.
andrasz is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 07:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
Rivets v screws

Originally Posted by dixi188
Looks like a screwed on panel to me.
Did the aircraft have some maintenance done whilst at Osaka?
I'm with you dixi188.
Old Fella is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 07:34
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 216
Likes: 2
From: USA
Could that possibly be the panel covering the wing escape slide? ANA had a 767 that lost two of those recently due to a malfunction of the escape slide inflation device. Maybe same issue here.
jrmyl is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 07:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 2
From: 3.5 from TD
Let's see the "heavily damaged" car please. That panel looks intact. How much damage could it have made? I'm guessing it gyrocopted down.
Sqwak7700 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 07:51
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 751
Likes: 72
From: Netherlands
It fell off a 777-200 ph-bqc which does not have a wing slide.
fox niner is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 07:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 59
Likes: 7
From: EIKY
Originally Posted by Sqwak7700
Let's see the "heavily damaged" car please. That panel looks intact. How much damage could it have made? I'm guessing it gyrocopted down.
The car's right-rear window was broken from footage I saw on news channel (was taped over) Looked like it just glanced the rear window, not a scratch anywhere else on the car. Driver was an elderly chap and a bit shocked by it, of course.
daelight is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 08:00
  #14 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,723
Likes: 2,093
From: Reading, UK
Larger version of the photo here: https://i0.wp.com/www.transponder120...ze=1000%2C1268

The countersinks are clearly visible, so we're not looking at screws that have pulled though.

I'd be looking at when the panel was last removed (presumably on a maintenance check) and examining the possibility that the wrong size of fastener was used to reattach it.

At least it wasn't a windscreen ...
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 08:28
  #15 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 1,116
From: UK
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK

At least it wasn't a windscreen ...
Leave it...
TURIN is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 09:12
  #16 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 91
Likes: 6
From: Hawarden (near EGNR)
Was it correct to continue to Amsterdam? I assume here that the panel and aircraft were identified shortly after the event.
Ancient-Mariner is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 09:17
  #17 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
The bracket behind the panel cracked. Known issue on the 777. Panel was secured correctly.

So move along pls... nothing to see.
ErwinS is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 09:48
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 304
Likes: 7
From: netherlands
I doubt the crew was aware of the lost panel. By the time the identification of the panel went up the chain of command to the airline, the aircraft would have been well underway to its destination.
sleeper is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 10:44
  #19 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 15
From: malta
Originally Posted by Ancient-Mariner
Was it correct to continue to Amsterdam? I assume here that the panel and aircraft were identified shortly after the event.
Why not? Mostly it's just a small performance and fuel penalty, not a significant reason to return/divert.

Of course specific information has to come from boeing, but any airline with this problem can gat that information quite easily if needed.
the_stranger is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2017 | 11:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Originally Posted by ErwinS
The bracket behind the panel cracked. Known issue on the 777. Panel was secured correctly.

So move along pls... nothing to see.
I'm not so sure about that. The screws are missing. And there is one hole in the light blue area that looks damaged - the one that would be at the top left on the plane, top right in the photo. I am suspecting that it was attached with only one or two screws.
.Scott is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.