Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 status showing in op systems without prior ECAM caution

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 status showing in op systems without prior ECAM caution

Old 9th Mar 2017, 20:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Coast to Coast...
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 status showing in op systems without prior ECAM caution

Occasionally on MSN >6000 we get an ECAM status page showing
CAT3 SINGLE ONLY with CAT3 DUAL listed under inoperative systems, this without any kind of ECAM warning or caution. Only in the air. Anyone shed some light as to why this might be happening and how, technical speaking, Airbus pilots must treat this when determining landing requirements for an LVO approach?
Smooth Airperator is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2017, 20:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Going back to some of the early three digit msn A320F it was due to an ADR disagree.
The next time it happens look at the cfds and select current leg report.
If the aircraft has decided you are Cat3 single then that is what you will get.
See also:
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/56293...y-no-ecam.html
tubby linton is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2017, 01:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This can happen on the ground also. On the ground, if you hard tune an ILS in the Rad Nav page then clear the ILS it removes the status. I can't remember why this works, it was explained to me one day but I can't recall the logic!
top operator is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2017, 08:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the aircraft says Cat 3 single then plan for Cat 3 A approach. The reason you don't get an ECAM caution is because there's no associated ECAM message or actions for the specific failure - as others have said it is often down to an ADR disagree, and one of the reasons we review the status page before starting an approach.

CFDS will give you a rough idea in flight if you're curious with more detailed reporting on the ground.
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2017, 06:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: in the sky allways
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This happens on ground as well....Park brakes on...Press brake peddals..Check status...cat 3 single only
speedbird787 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2017, 11:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now then that's an interesting one. I wonder why it does that as the brake pedals don't do anything when the park brake is applied?
PilotJames is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2017, 11:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had one the other day
NAV LS tuning disagree. A disagree between MMR1 and MMR2 which is a joint GPS/ILS box.
On the ground we had no caution but inop CAT 2 (interesting one as you can't arm the approach pb).
The caution came up at 1500 feet, once out of TO inhibit.
Easy way to solve it is to hard tune the ILS in the rad nav page.
PilotJames is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 23:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5 above the Equator, 75 left of Greenwich
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This one actually goes away by itself when you're preparing the approach and select the runway for arrival. At least that's how it's happened to me the 2 or 3 times I've got it.

You prepare for a Cat 3 approach with DH.
Escape Path is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 12:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In the land of smog
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fursty Ferret
CFDS will give you a rough idea in flight if you're curious with more detailed reporting on the ground.
Our manuals only allow CFDS on the ground with both engines off and the park brake set.
TSIO540 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 17:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: FL 391
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As previously mentioned, it happens usually when ADRs disagree. I have been showed a trick which worked in flight ( don't know the technicalities behind it though ) : engage AP 2, reset FAC 1, then engage AP1, reset FAC 2. That can rid you of the CAT 3 SINGLE ONLY on the memo. Of course it goes without saying that if you have CAT 3 SINGLE ONLY memo, you will of course be able to shoot a CAT 3 SINGLE ONLY approach.
Happy landings.
Soft Altitude is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 12:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone able to expand on what speedbird said regarding pressing the brake pedals and CAT 3 single.
Not noticed this myself, can't say I've tried.
PilotJames is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 13:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been showed a trick which worked in flight ( don't know the technicalities behind it though )
Tricks and Airbusses....bad idea! Especially if you 'don't know the technicalities'...
PENKO is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 23:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Soft Altitude
As previously mentioned, it happens usually when ADRs disagree. I have been showed a trick which worked in flight ( don't know the technicalities behind it though ) : engage AP 2, reset FAC 1, then engage AP1, reset FAC 2. That can rid you of the CAT 3 SINGLE ONLY on the memo. Of course it goes without saying that if you have CAT 3 SINGLE ONLY memo, you will of course be able to shoot a CAT 3 SINGLE ONLY approach.
Happy landings.
This is a VERY bad idea. Read the final report of the Air Asia crash and hopefully you will see it yourself as well.

Doing some random non-approved resets in flight on a very complex and computer-driven aircraft. What could possibly go wrong....
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 17:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5 above the Equator, 75 left of Greenwich
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd avoid resetting a flight control computer (ELAC, SEC, FAC) unless requested by ECAM/QRH at all costs. Especially in flight!
Escape Path is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 22:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,478
Received 139 Likes on 76 Posts
WHEN you reported this fault after arrival, in the tech log not on a scrap of paper pinned to the table, what did the engineer/mechanic sign it off with? There should be a TSM/AMM reference for the fix.

Or am I missing something?
TURIN is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 10:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QRH gives green light to computer resets in flight, with the caveat that you do it one at a time...

There's also a difference between pulling the CB for a computer (bad idea) and using the push button control.
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 17:56
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5 above the Equator, 75 left of Greenwich
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fursty Ferret
QRH gives green light to computer resets in flight, with the caveat that you do it one at a time...
Yes that's right, but that's in the event of a failure, not just randomly resetting computers and autopilots for the sake of it.
Escape Path is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2017, 13:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: 43N
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. We operate SOP. We are pilots not engineers. We use the Airbus approved manual to operate the aircraft safely, we don't write nor rewrite, nor selectively quibble the clear meaning of the manual.

"The PIC had seen the engineer resetting the FAC CB on the ground. Having experience of witnessing and performing FAC CB reset, the PIC might consider that he “fully understand the consequences”. Resetting the FAC CB on the ground and in flight has different consequences. The FAC CBs were not included in the list of the CB allowed in OEB and TDUs to be reset in flight. The consequences of resetting FAC CBs in flight are not described in Airbus documents. It requires good understanding of the aircraft system to be aware of the consequences."

QZ8501. 162 dead.
CaptainMongo is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2017, 09:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes! just follow the procedures. Cockpit is not a place to allow creativity to run wild.
vilas is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.