Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737-8 MAX takeoff performance

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737-8 MAX takeoff performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd October 2017 | 15:39
  #21 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 4
From: UK
Having operated the max in/out of SWF & BDL during the recent hot spell ( north of 30c) I have been very impressed with the performance margin and have not needed to even look at bleeds off, all are SFP aircraft, the fuel burn reduction is a big plus.

Winter ops bring fresh challenges of course, but many of the pilots operating these routes have a lot of experience with contaminated runways into Norway
EIFFS is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd October 2017 | 16:29
  #22 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 68
From: UK
seems my source at Norwegian a skipper on 738NG and the new MAX says GIB is a no go for them or infact likely for anyone with these types on an airline op.

its an A320 757 or a 737 classic mission or a 737-700 at best for GIB

sadly Monarch will not now be gong there anymore anyway

they have 45 MAX orders up for sale as now not wanted
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th October 2017 | 01:35
  #23 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 4
From: UK
Rog747

Not correct, based on 09 1013 000/0 +25c with bleeds off I calculate a MTOM of 73.3 so given max landing is 69.0 I don't see back to the UK as a problem.

The landing is more of a challenge but still above MLM with F40, not a big margin I'll grant you but 160 pax would be no issue.

The SFP makes a huge difference, I have landed at GIB in a 300 and stopped before the road.
EIFFS is offline  
Reply
Old 4th October 2017 | 04:26
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 977
Likes: 121
From: Oz
According to Google Earth, they are well underway on a runway extension that makes the runway TODA about 2700m (8800 feet). That should be plenty.
nomorecatering is offline  
Reply
Old 4th October 2017 | 09:20
  #25 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 68
From: UK
Originally Posted by EIFFS
Rog747

Not correct, based on 09 1013 000/0 +25c with bleeds off I calculate a MTOM of 73.3 so given max landing is 69.0 I don't see back to the UK as a problem.

The landing is more of a challenge but still above MLM with F40, not a big margin I'll grant you but 160 pax would be no issue.

The SFP makes a huge difference, I have landed at GIB in a 300 and stopped before the road.
thank you for that - my pal at DY says they (DY) would be restricted on LDW to around 62 tonnes on GIB's 09 -
I assume a non-SFP a/c (738NG 73H)

the MAX has not AFAIK been developed yet with a SFP option although has been talked about

restricting payload by around 30 pax is quite a biggy from 189 to as you say about 160 - not sure if any airline ops would welcome that as either functional or economical?

the classic 300/400 to 700 (73G) series which can go in there now have no problems as you stated with a -300 thanks
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2017 | 21:30
  #26 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Wherever LNAV Goes...
Would anyone have 737 Max FCOM/FCTM available to send me via PM? My company are not due to get them for a few years. Any other interesting MAX documents would be also appreciated.
JT8D-17 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th April 2018 | 13:57
  #27 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 68
From: UK
Originally Posted by Skyjob
I think it will all be fine, after all the BBJ serviced for KLM used to fly AMS-IAH with some AUX tanks not even a decade ago.
That was non-stop, nil diversions (due fuel)
yeah but with a J load only - not 189Y
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2018 | 04:51
  #28 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
It's wishing it were a 757 but clearly it is NOT! Actually the MTOW of a 752 is 255000 lbs...but according to some media or tabloids papers the 737 can currently carry up to 40000 Tons of fuel that is 40 kilotons
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.