Partial spoiler deployment
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: FL390
Partial spoiler deployment
Phased Lift Dumping and Partial Spoiler Extension.
I thought that Airbus changed the name to the first one. However I am not sure if this is the case.
There are some differences in the deployment conditions.
But is it there any other difference other than that?
I thought that Airbus changed the name to the first one. However I am not sure if this is the case.
There are some differences in the deployment conditions.
But is it there any other difference other than that?
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: FL390
We have aircrafts in the fleet having the one system and other aircrafts having the other one. But both are with partial deployment. I see no difference. Only the wording.
I think there is no difference. PLD is a new term because I see it in CEOs only. Anyway the Warsaw accident was way too old. This change is relatively new.
I think there is no difference. PLD is a new term because I see it in CEOs only. Anyway the Warsaw accident was way too old. This change is relatively new.
Last edited by Lantirn; 17th November 2016 at 20:20.

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
Lantirn
I think you are talking about installation of SEC standard120. You can read it in Airbus safety Magazine issue9 FEB2010. The logic of spoiler extension was made tolerant to inappropriate speed brake/thrust lever combination.
http://www.ukfsc.co.uk/files/Safety%...Feb%202010.pdf
I think you are talking about installation of SEC standard120. You can read it in Airbus safety Magazine issue9 FEB2010. The logic of spoiler extension was made tolerant to inappropriate speed brake/thrust lever combination.
http://www.ukfsc.co.uk/files/Safety%...Feb%202010.pdf




